通过多人干预模式预防青少年吸烟。

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2023-12-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/175065
Francisco Carrión-Valero, Joan Antoni Ribera-Osca, Jose M Martin-Moreno, Alejandro Martin-Gorgojo
{"title":"通过多人干预模式预防青少年吸烟。","authors":"Francisco Carrión-Valero, Joan Antoni Ribera-Osca, Jose M Martin-Moreno, Alejandro Martin-Gorgojo","doi":"10.18332/tpc/175065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The study aimed to assess the impact of a new intervention proposal involving students, teachers, and parents on smoking prevalence in secondary school adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study was conducted, in which the response to a preventive multi-personal intervention model (intervention) against tobacco consumption was compared with a standard anti-smoking activity carried out by the local government administration (control). The study was carried out during the 2017-2018 academic year. The study population included 306 students (intervention 151, control 155) with a mean age of 13.4 years. The model involved the parents, the students (aged 15-17 years), and the teachers. The primary outcome was the change in smoking status one year after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of non-smokers increased from 84.1% to 88.7% in the intervention group and remained almost unchanged among controls (89.3% vs 89.9%). After one year, there was an increase in the prevalence of non-smokers of 4.6% and a decrease in the prevalence of smokers of 4.7% among students who received the multi-personal intervention, whereas changes among controls were almost negligible (there was in fact a slight increase in the prevalence of smokers of 0.9%). The students who received the intervention smoked less or quit smoking more than those in the control group (OR=0.135; 95% CI: 0.019-0.973, p=0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multi-personal model developed in the study with the participation of teachers and parents focused on students was feasible, and effectively reduced the prevalence of smoking among high school adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"9 ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10726255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of tobacco use in an adolescent population through a multi-personal intervention model.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Carrión-Valero, Joan Antoni Ribera-Osca, Jose M Martin-Moreno, Alejandro Martin-Gorgojo\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/tpc/175065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The study aimed to assess the impact of a new intervention proposal involving students, teachers, and parents on smoking prevalence in secondary school adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study was conducted, in which the response to a preventive multi-personal intervention model (intervention) against tobacco consumption was compared with a standard anti-smoking activity carried out by the local government administration (control). The study was carried out during the 2017-2018 academic year. The study population included 306 students (intervention 151, control 155) with a mean age of 13.4 years. The model involved the parents, the students (aged 15-17 years), and the teachers. The primary outcome was the change in smoking status one year after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of non-smokers increased from 84.1% to 88.7% in the intervention group and remained almost unchanged among controls (89.3% vs 89.9%). After one year, there was an increase in the prevalence of non-smokers of 4.6% and a decrease in the prevalence of smokers of 4.7% among students who received the multi-personal intervention, whereas changes among controls were almost negligible (there was in fact a slight increase in the prevalence of smokers of 0.9%). The students who received the intervention smoked less or quit smoking more than those in the control group (OR=0.135; 95% CI: 0.019-0.973, p=0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multi-personal model developed in the study with the participation of teachers and parents focused on students was feasible, and effectively reduced the prevalence of smoking among high school adolescents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10726255/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/175065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/175065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究旨在评估学生、教师和家长参与的新干预方案对中学青少年吸烟率的影响:本研究旨在评估学生、教师和家长共同参与的新干预方案对中学青少年吸烟率的影响:在这项准实验研究中,针对烟草消费的多人预防性干预模式(干预)与当地政府行政部门开展的标准禁烟活动(对照)的反应进行了比较。研究在 2017-2018 学年进行。研究对象包括 306 名学生(干预组 151 人,对照组 155 人),平均年龄为 13.4 岁。该模式涉及家长、学生(15-17 岁)和教师。主要结果是干预一年后吸烟状况的变化:结果:干预组的非吸烟者比例从 84.1%上升到 88.7%,对照组几乎没有变化(89.3% 对 89.9%)。一年后,接受多人干预的学生不吸烟的比例上升了 4.6%,吸烟的比例下降了 4.7%,而对照组的变化几乎可以忽略不计(实际上吸烟的比例略微上升了 0.9%)。与对照组相比,接受干预的学生吸烟更少或戒烟更多(OR=0.135;95% CI:0.019-0.973,P=0.047):本研究开发的以学生为中心、教师和家长共同参与的多人干预模式是可行的,并能有效降低高中青少年的吸烟率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevention of tobacco use in an adolescent population through a multi-personal intervention model.

Introduction: The study aimed to assess the impact of a new intervention proposal involving students, teachers, and parents on smoking prevalence in secondary school adolescents.

Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted, in which the response to a preventive multi-personal intervention model (intervention) against tobacco consumption was compared with a standard anti-smoking activity carried out by the local government administration (control). The study was carried out during the 2017-2018 academic year. The study population included 306 students (intervention 151, control 155) with a mean age of 13.4 years. The model involved the parents, the students (aged 15-17 years), and the teachers. The primary outcome was the change in smoking status one year after the intervention.

Results: The percentage of non-smokers increased from 84.1% to 88.7% in the intervention group and remained almost unchanged among controls (89.3% vs 89.9%). After one year, there was an increase in the prevalence of non-smokers of 4.6% and a decrease in the prevalence of smokers of 4.7% among students who received the multi-personal intervention, whereas changes among controls were almost negligible (there was in fact a slight increase in the prevalence of smokers of 0.9%). The students who received the intervention smoked less or quit smoking more than those in the control group (OR=0.135; 95% CI: 0.019-0.973, p=0.047).

Conclusions: The multi-personal model developed in the study with the participation of teachers and parents focused on students was feasible, and effectively reduced the prevalence of smoking among high school adolescents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信