E Pesaressi, D Zelada-Lopez, T Cosme, J Diaz, M Huanqui, M Fidela de Lima Navarro, R S Villena
{"title":"12 个月后,对带有和不带有固位槽的原牙进行二级 ART 修复的随机临床试验。","authors":"E Pesaressi, D Zelada-Lopez, T Cosme, J Diaz, M Huanqui, M Fidela de Lima Navarro, R S Villena","doi":"10.23804/ejpd.2023.1968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the survival of Class II ART (Atraumatic Restorative Treatment) restorations in primary molars using encapsulated glass ionomer in cavities with and without retentive grooves. A total of 293 Class II restorations were performed on primary molars by three trained operators, using ART hand instruments (SS White/Duflex, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and restored with EQUIA Fil (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). One hundred eighty-seven children aged 3 to 7 years (mean age = 5.5) from two public schools located in Lima, Peru, were included in the study. The restorations were performed following the ART protocol, randomising the presence or absence of proximal retentions. Cavity cleaning and restoration times were recorded by the assistant using a digital chronometer. After 6 and 12 months, evaluations occurred following the ART criteria. Data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney, Chisquare and Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier survival and logarithmic range. The mean dmf-s of the participants was 21.6 (S.D. = 10.2). The mean times to clean the cavity and apply the restorative material were 5.4 and 6.6 minutes, respectively. Success rates after 6 and 12 months for restorations without retentive grooves were 90.3% and 77.2%, respectively; and with retentive grooves 95.9% and 91.8%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found at the 12-month follow-up (p = 0.001). The proximal retentive grooves increased the survival rate of ART Class II restorations in primary teeth after 12 months of follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":11930,"journal":{"name":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"42 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomised clinical trial of Class II ART restoration in primary teeth with and without retentive grooves after 12 months.\",\"authors\":\"E Pesaressi, D Zelada-Lopez, T Cosme, J Diaz, M Huanqui, M Fidela de Lima Navarro, R S Villena\",\"doi\":\"10.23804/ejpd.2023.1968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the survival of Class II ART (Atraumatic Restorative Treatment) restorations in primary molars using encapsulated glass ionomer in cavities with and without retentive grooves. A total of 293 Class II restorations were performed on primary molars by three trained operators, using ART hand instruments (SS White/Duflex, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and restored with EQUIA Fil (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). One hundred eighty-seven children aged 3 to 7 years (mean age = 5.5) from two public schools located in Lima, Peru, were included in the study. The restorations were performed following the ART protocol, randomising the presence or absence of proximal retentions. Cavity cleaning and restoration times were recorded by the assistant using a digital chronometer. After 6 and 12 months, evaluations occurred following the ART criteria. Data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney, Chisquare and Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier survival and logarithmic range. The mean dmf-s of the participants was 21.6 (S.D. = 10.2). The mean times to clean the cavity and apply the restorative material were 5.4 and 6.6 minutes, respectively. Success rates after 6 and 12 months for restorations without retentive grooves were 90.3% and 77.2%, respectively; and with retentive grooves 95.9% and 91.8%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found at the 12-month follow-up (p = 0.001). The proximal retentive grooves increased the survival rate of ART Class II restorations in primary teeth after 12 months of follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"42 - 49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2023.1968\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2023.1968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:该研究旨在评估在有和没有固位沟槽的龋洞中使用封装玻璃离聚体对小磨牙进行 ART(无损伤修复治疗)II 类修复的存活率。三名经过培训的操作人员使用 ART 手工器械(SS White/Duflex,巴西里约热内卢)对 293 颗小磨牙进行了 II 类修复,并用 EQUIA Fil(GC 公司,日本东京)进行了修复。研究对象包括秘鲁利马两所公立学校的 187 名 3 至 7 岁儿童(平均年龄为 5.5 岁)。修复按照 ART 方案进行,随机决定是否使用近端固位体。龋洞清洁和修复时间由助手使用数字天文钟记录。6 个月和 12 个月后,按照 ART 标准进行评估。数据分析采用曼-惠特尼、奇氏方差和费雪精确检验、卡普兰-梅耶生存率和对数范围。参与者的平均 dmf-s 为 21.6(S.D. = 10.2)。清洁牙洞和使用修复材料的平均时间分别为 5.4 分钟和 6.6 分钟。6个月和12个月后,无固位槽的修复成功率分别为90.3%和77.2%;有固位槽的修复成功率分别为95.9%和91.8%。在 12 个月的随访中发现了明显的统计学差异(p = 0.001)。近端固位槽提高了基牙 ART II 类修复体在 12 个月随访后的存活率。
Randomised clinical trial of Class II ART restoration in primary teeth with and without retentive grooves after 12 months.
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the survival of Class II ART (Atraumatic Restorative Treatment) restorations in primary molars using encapsulated glass ionomer in cavities with and without retentive grooves. A total of 293 Class II restorations were performed on primary molars by three trained operators, using ART hand instruments (SS White/Duflex, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and restored with EQUIA Fil (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). One hundred eighty-seven children aged 3 to 7 years (mean age = 5.5) from two public schools located in Lima, Peru, were included in the study. The restorations were performed following the ART protocol, randomising the presence or absence of proximal retentions. Cavity cleaning and restoration times were recorded by the assistant using a digital chronometer. After 6 and 12 months, evaluations occurred following the ART criteria. Data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney, Chisquare and Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier survival and logarithmic range. The mean dmf-s of the participants was 21.6 (S.D. = 10.2). The mean times to clean the cavity and apply the restorative material were 5.4 and 6.6 minutes, respectively. Success rates after 6 and 12 months for restorations without retentive grooves were 90.3% and 77.2%, respectively; and with retentive grooves 95.9% and 91.8%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found at the 12-month follow-up (p = 0.001). The proximal retentive grooves increased the survival rate of ART Class II restorations in primary teeth after 12 months of follow-up.
期刊介绍:
The aim and scope of the European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry related to children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs.