简要报告:筛查发现的肺结节与偶发肺结节患者的非恶性切除术:肺结节管理的差异

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Brian M. Till , Tyler Grenda , Taylor Tidwell , Baylor Wickes , Christine Shusted , Brooke Ruane , Olugbenga Okusanya , Nathaniel R. Evans III , Julie A. Barta
{"title":"简要报告:筛查发现的肺结节与偶发肺结节患者的非恶性切除术:肺结节管理的差异","authors":"Brian M. Till ,&nbsp;Tyler Grenda ,&nbsp;Taylor Tidwell ,&nbsp;Baylor Wickes ,&nbsp;Christine Shusted ,&nbsp;Brooke Ruane ,&nbsp;Olugbenga Okusanya ,&nbsp;Nathaniel R. Evans III ,&nbsp;Julie A. Barta","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2023.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>With the increasing emphasis on early detection of lung cancer through lung cancer screening programs and incidental lung nodule programs, identifying and measuring clinically relevant patient-centered outcomes is critical.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>This study aimed to characterize factors associated with nonmalignant surgical resection among patients with suspicious pulmonary nodules, focusing on comparisons among individuals with screen-detected versus incidental lung nodules. Individuals with screen-detected or incidental lung nodules may experience differing nodule management strategies and surgical outcomes.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>In addition, receipt of more intensive lung nodule management may be associated with lower odds of nonmalignant resection. These findings underscore the need for further investigation of best practices in lung nodule management by multidisciplinary teams.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief Report: Nonmalignant Surgical Resection Among Individuals with Screening-Detected Versus Incidental Lung Nodules\",\"authors\":\"Brian M. Till ,&nbsp;Tyler Grenda ,&nbsp;Taylor Tidwell ,&nbsp;Baylor Wickes ,&nbsp;Christine Shusted ,&nbsp;Brooke Ruane ,&nbsp;Olugbenga Okusanya ,&nbsp;Nathaniel R. Evans III ,&nbsp;Julie A. Barta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2023.12.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>With the increasing emphasis on early detection of lung cancer through lung cancer screening programs and incidental lung nodule programs, identifying and measuring clinically relevant patient-centered outcomes is critical.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>This study aimed to characterize factors associated with nonmalignant surgical resection among patients with suspicious pulmonary nodules, focusing on comparisons among individuals with screen-detected versus incidental lung nodules. Individuals with screen-detected or incidental lung nodules may experience differing nodule management strategies and surgical outcomes.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>In addition, receipt of more intensive lung nodule management may be associated with lower odds of nonmalignant resection. These findings underscore the need for further investigation of best practices in lung nodule management by multidisciplinary teams.</p></span></li></ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730423002656\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730423002656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,通过肺癌筛查 (LCS) 计划发现肺结节的患者与偶然发现肺结节的患者是否会因为其结节检测状态而经历不同的临床和手术结果,这一点仍不得而知。我们旨在描述基线特征、肺结节评估策略和非恶性切除(NMR)率,重点比较筛查发现的肺结节与偶然发现的肺结节之间的差异。方法我们对 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 8 月期间在一家机构接受筛查发现或偶然发现的肺结节疑似肺癌手术切除的患者进行了回顾性分析。使用 SPSS 进行了统计分析,包括卡方检验、独立 t 检验和逻辑回归分析。结果 在接受手术切除的 256 例患者中,228 例(89.1%)为偶然发现的结节,28 例(10.9%)为筛查发现的结节。与偶然发现结节组相比,筛查发现结节组的黑人患者比例更高,吸烟史更长。这组患者的核磁共振成像率也较高,但无统计学意义。与偶然发现肺部结节的患者相比,筛查发现结节的患者接受指南一致或更强化肺部结节管理的比例明显更高。单变量分析显示,年龄、结节直径、PET SUV-最大值和结节管理策略与 NMR 相关。结论筛查出肺部结节和偶然发现肺部结节的患者可能会经历不同的结节管理策略和手术结果。应继续在早期检测项目中研究导致以患者为中心的结果的人口学、临床和其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brief Report: Nonmalignant Surgical Resection Among Individuals with Screening-Detected Versus Incidental Lung Nodules

  • With the increasing emphasis on early detection of lung cancer through lung cancer screening programs and incidental lung nodule programs, identifying and measuring clinically relevant patient-centered outcomes is critical.

  • This study aimed to characterize factors associated with nonmalignant surgical resection among patients with suspicious pulmonary nodules, focusing on comparisons among individuals with screen-detected versus incidental lung nodules. Individuals with screen-detected or incidental lung nodules may experience differing nodule management strategies and surgical outcomes.

  • In addition, receipt of more intensive lung nodule management may be associated with lower odds of nonmalignant resection. These findings underscore the need for further investigation of best practices in lung nodule management by multidisciplinary teams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信