电力公司的计划符合美国大多数州的可再生能源组合标准和清洁能源标准

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Grace D. Kroeger, Matthew G. Burgess
{"title":"电力公司的计划符合美国大多数州的可再生能源组合标准和清洁能源标准","authors":"Grace D. Kroeger, Matthew G. Burgess","doi":"10.1007/s10584-023-03645-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Electricity is one of the easiest—and therefore most urgent—sectors to decarbonize. In the USA, state-level Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) and Clean Energy Standards (CES) are key policy tools pursuant to this objective. These policies mandate that electric utilities achieve specified renewable compositions on specified timelines. In recent US history, electricity has been decarbonizing faster than major agencies predicted, which raises the question of whether utilities are decarbonizing faster than RPS and CES targets prescribe. We address this question by comparing state-level RPS and CES targets to historical progress and stated decarbonization targets from 220 utilities, comprising at least 52% of sales in every state and 76% of sales on average. In 18 of 26 states with current RPS or CES and 9 of 11 states with expired RPS or CES, utilities’ generation and targets meet, nearly meet, or exceed state targets. We project that utility targets and linear progress thereafter put six states without current RPS or CES on track for over 90% renewable electricity by 2050, and they put US electricity on track to reach 100% renewable by 2060. Including nuclear—unlike most RPS and CES policies—makes these results starker: utilities’ past and planned generation meets or exceeds 31 of 37 state targets, 14 states without RPS or CES would decarbonize electricity by 2050, and US electricity would also decarbonize by 2050. Our results suggest that electric utility plans are mostly consistent with state-level targets but are behind the Biden administration’s target of decarbonizing electricity by 2035.</p>","PeriodicalId":10372,"journal":{"name":"Climatic Change","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electric utility plans are consistent with Renewable Portfolio Standards and Clean Energy Standards in most US states\",\"authors\":\"Grace D. Kroeger, Matthew G. Burgess\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10584-023-03645-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Electricity is one of the easiest—and therefore most urgent—sectors to decarbonize. In the USA, state-level Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) and Clean Energy Standards (CES) are key policy tools pursuant to this objective. These policies mandate that electric utilities achieve specified renewable compositions on specified timelines. In recent US history, electricity has been decarbonizing faster than major agencies predicted, which raises the question of whether utilities are decarbonizing faster than RPS and CES targets prescribe. We address this question by comparing state-level RPS and CES targets to historical progress and stated decarbonization targets from 220 utilities, comprising at least 52% of sales in every state and 76% of sales on average. In 18 of 26 states with current RPS or CES and 9 of 11 states with expired RPS or CES, utilities’ generation and targets meet, nearly meet, or exceed state targets. We project that utility targets and linear progress thereafter put six states without current RPS or CES on track for over 90% renewable electricity by 2050, and they put US electricity on track to reach 100% renewable by 2060. Including nuclear—unlike most RPS and CES policies—makes these results starker: utilities’ past and planned generation meets or exceeds 31 of 37 state targets, 14 states without RPS or CES would decarbonize electricity by 2050, and US electricity would also decarbonize by 2050. Our results suggest that electric utility plans are mostly consistent with state-level targets but are behind the Biden administration’s target of decarbonizing electricity by 2035.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climatic Change\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climatic Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03645-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climatic Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03645-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电力是最容易去碳化的部门之一,因此也是最迫切需要去碳化的部门。在美国,州一级的可再生能源组合标准(RPS)和清洁能源标准(CES)是实现这一目标的关键政策工具。这些政策要求电力公司在规定的时间内达到规定的可再生能源比例。在美国近代史上,电力去碳化的速度快于主要机构的预测,这就提出了一个问题:电力公司去碳化的速度是否快于 RPS 和 CES 目标的规定。为了解决这个问题,我们将各州的 RPS 和 CES 目标与 220 家公用事业公司的历史进展和声明的脱碳目标进行了比较,这 220 家公用事业公司至少占各州销售额的 52%,平均占销售额的 76%。在 26 个有现行 RPS 或 CES 的州中的 18 个州,以及 11 个有过期 RPS 或 CES 的州中的 9 个州,公用事业公司的发电量和目标达到、接近达到或超过了州目标。我们预计,公用事业的目标和此后的线性进展将使六个没有现行 RPS 或 CES 的州有望在 2050 年之前实现 90% 以上的可再生能源电力,并使美国电力有望在 2060 年之前实现 100% 的可再生能源电力。与大多数 RPS 和 CES 政策不同的是,将核能包括在内使得这些结果更加明显:电力公司过去和计划的发电量达到或超过了 37 个州中 31 个州的目标,14 个没有 RPS 或 CES 的州将在 2050 年前实现电力去碳化,美国电力也将在 2050 年前实现去碳化。我们的研究结果表明,电力公司的计划与各州的目标基本一致,但落后于拜登政府提出的到 2035 年实现电力去碳化的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Electric utility plans are consistent with Renewable Portfolio Standards and Clean Energy Standards in most US states

Electric utility plans are consistent with Renewable Portfolio Standards and Clean Energy Standards in most US states

Electricity is one of the easiest—and therefore most urgent—sectors to decarbonize. In the USA, state-level Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) and Clean Energy Standards (CES) are key policy tools pursuant to this objective. These policies mandate that electric utilities achieve specified renewable compositions on specified timelines. In recent US history, electricity has been decarbonizing faster than major agencies predicted, which raises the question of whether utilities are decarbonizing faster than RPS and CES targets prescribe. We address this question by comparing state-level RPS and CES targets to historical progress and stated decarbonization targets from 220 utilities, comprising at least 52% of sales in every state and 76% of sales on average. In 18 of 26 states with current RPS or CES and 9 of 11 states with expired RPS or CES, utilities’ generation and targets meet, nearly meet, or exceed state targets. We project that utility targets and linear progress thereafter put six states without current RPS or CES on track for over 90% renewable electricity by 2050, and they put US electricity on track to reach 100% renewable by 2060. Including nuclear—unlike most RPS and CES policies—makes these results starker: utilities’ past and planned generation meets or exceeds 31 of 37 state targets, 14 states without RPS or CES would decarbonize electricity by 2050, and US electricity would also decarbonize by 2050. Our results suggest that electric utility plans are mostly consistent with state-level targets but are behind the Biden administration’s target of decarbonizing electricity by 2035.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climatic Change
Climatic Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Climatic Change is dedicated to the totality of the problem of climatic variability and change - its descriptions, causes, implications and interactions among these. The purpose of the journal is to provide a means of exchange among those working in different disciplines on problems related to climatic variations. This means that authors have an opportunity to communicate the essence of their studies to people in other climate-related disciplines and to interested non-disciplinarians, as well as to report on research in which the originality is in the combinations of (not necessarily original) work from several disciplines. The journal also includes vigorous editorial and book review sections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信