哪个 ESG+F 维度对私人投资者最重要?关于财务决策和子孙后代的实验研究

IF 4.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Matteo Benuzzi , Klaudijo Klaser , Karoline Bax
{"title":"哪个 ESG+F 维度对私人投资者最重要?关于财务决策和子孙后代的实验研究","authors":"Matteo Benuzzi ,&nbsp;Klaudijo Klaser ,&nbsp;Karoline Bax","doi":"10.1016/j.jbef.2023.100882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we address the ongoing debate about the relative importance of the three dimensions of the ESG framework and whether they are sufficient to capture the full scope of sustainability. We propose a new dimension, the Future Generations pillar (F-pillar), which aims to account for intergenerational equity and sustainability. Our online experiment explores how retail investors make investment decisions when presented with different combinations of financial and ESG information, including the F-pillar. Our findings suggest that retail investors try to balance their financial objectives with sustainability considerations. Moreover, the E-pillar appears to be most relevant when investors adopt a sustainability perspective, while the S-pillar is most relevant when investors consider the financial perspective. Interestingly, our results show that an explicit F-pillar is somewhat redundant, as individuals believe that the three existing ESG pillars already indirectly address the sustainability towards the future generations. This study contributes to the ongoing debate on the relevance of the ESG framework and highlights the need to further explore the interplay between financial and sustainability considerations in retail investment decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100882"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635023000965/pdfft?md5=7897464af9b2d2002fec1d2b9a437e55&pid=1-s2.0-S2214635023000965-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which ESG+F dimension matters most to retail investors? An experimental study on financial decisions and future generations\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Benuzzi ,&nbsp;Klaudijo Klaser ,&nbsp;Karoline Bax\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbef.2023.100882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, we address the ongoing debate about the relative importance of the three dimensions of the ESG framework and whether they are sufficient to capture the full scope of sustainability. We propose a new dimension, the Future Generations pillar (F-pillar), which aims to account for intergenerational equity and sustainability. Our online experiment explores how retail investors make investment decisions when presented with different combinations of financial and ESG information, including the F-pillar. Our findings suggest that retail investors try to balance their financial objectives with sustainability considerations. Moreover, the E-pillar appears to be most relevant when investors adopt a sustainability perspective, while the S-pillar is most relevant when investors consider the financial perspective. Interestingly, our results show that an explicit F-pillar is somewhat redundant, as individuals believe that the three existing ESG pillars already indirectly address the sustainability towards the future generations. This study contributes to the ongoing debate on the relevance of the ESG framework and highlights the need to further explore the interplay between financial and sustainability considerations in retail investment decision-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100882\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635023000965/pdfft?md5=7897464af9b2d2002fec1d2b9a437e55&pid=1-s2.0-S2214635023000965-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635023000965\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635023000965","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们探讨了目前关于环境、社会和公司治理框架三个维度的相对重要性以及它们是否足以全面反映可持续性的争论。我们提出了一个新的维度,即 "后代支柱"(Fpillar),旨在考虑代际公平和可持续性。我们的在线实验探索了散户投资者在获得不同组合的财务和环境、社会和公司治理信息(包括 F 支柱)时如何做出投资决策。我们的研究结果表明,散户投资者试图在财务目标和可持续发展考虑之间取得平衡。此外,当投资者从可持续发展的角度考虑问题时,E 柱似乎最为相关,而当投资者从财务角度考虑问题时,S 柱则最为相关。有趣的是,我们的研究结果表明,明确的 F 支柱在某种程度上是多余的,因为个人认为现有的三个 ESG 支柱已经间接地解决了对后代的可持续发展问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which ESG+F dimension matters most to retail investors? An experimental study on financial decisions and future generations

In this study, we address the ongoing debate about the relative importance of the three dimensions of the ESG framework and whether they are sufficient to capture the full scope of sustainability. We propose a new dimension, the Future Generations pillar (F-pillar), which aims to account for intergenerational equity and sustainability. Our online experiment explores how retail investors make investment decisions when presented with different combinations of financial and ESG information, including the F-pillar. Our findings suggest that retail investors try to balance their financial objectives with sustainability considerations. Moreover, the E-pillar appears to be most relevant when investors adopt a sustainability perspective, while the S-pillar is most relevant when investors consider the financial perspective. Interestingly, our results show that an explicit F-pillar is somewhat redundant, as individuals believe that the three existing ESG pillars already indirectly address the sustainability towards the future generations. This study contributes to the ongoing debate on the relevance of the ESG framework and highlights the need to further explore the interplay between financial and sustainability considerations in retail investment decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
75
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Experimental Finance represent lenses and approaches through which we can view financial decision-making. The aim of the journal is to publish high quality research in all fields of finance, where such research is carried out with a behavioral perspective and / or is carried out via experimental methods. It is open to but not limited to papers which cover investigations of biases, the role of various neurological markers in financial decision making, national and organizational culture as it impacts financial decision making, sentiment and asset pricing, the design and implementation of experiments to investigate financial decision making and trading, methodological experiments, and natural experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance welcomes full-length and short letter papers in the area of behavioral finance and experimental finance. The focus is on rapid dissemination of high-impact research in these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信