"选择计划,掷骰子":消费者在非团体市场选择医疗计划的定性研究

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elena Faugno , Melissa B. Gilkey , Lauren A. Cripps , Anna Sinaiko , Alon Peltz , Jon Kingsdale , Alison A. Galbraith
{"title":"\"选择计划,掷骰子\":消费者在非团体市场选择医疗计划的定性研究","authors":"Elena Faugno ,&nbsp;Melissa B. Gilkey ,&nbsp;Lauren A. Cripps ,&nbsp;Anna Sinaiko ,&nbsp;Alon Peltz ,&nbsp;Jon Kingsdale ,&nbsp;Alison A. Galbraith","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For consumers without access to employer-sponsored or public insurance, health plan choices in the non-group (individual) insurance market that do not meet consumer needs have the potential for negative downstream implications for health and financial well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This qualitative interview study sought to understand consumers’ experiences and challenges with choosing a non-group health plan, among those who later had negative experiences with the plan they chose.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with a purposive sample of 36 participants from a large regional health insurance carrier in three states who enrolled in non-group plans in 2017 (21 in Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace plans and 15 enrolled off-Marketplace). Participants were included if they reported negative experiences using their plan after enrollment, such as higher-than-expected medical costs. Interviews explored challenges choosing a plan; information needed for choosing; usefulness of available tools; and preferred format for interventions to improve plan choice experiences. We analyzed interview transcripts using thematic content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study participants reported experiencing substantial challenges to choosing an insurance plan. Key barriers included understanding insurance terms, finding relevant information, and making comparisons across plans. Participants valued the ability to make comparisons across carriers when using the Marketplace websites but were less satisfied with customer service. Suggestions for improvement included greater standardization of plans and language and availability of customized one-on-one assistance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings from this study suggest that health plan selection in the non-group market presents challenges to consumers that may be addressed through enrollment assistance and improved presentation of information. Personalized assistance to find and choose coverage may lead to plan choices that better meet consumer needs and increase confidence choosing a plan in subsequent enrollment periods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000242/pdfft?md5=ecf805ebaba2f51b65f49272058ede82&pid=1-s2.0-S2590229623000242-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Pick a Plan and Roll the Dice”: A qualitative study of consumer experiences selecting a health plan in the non-group market\",\"authors\":\"Elena Faugno ,&nbsp;Melissa B. Gilkey ,&nbsp;Lauren A. Cripps ,&nbsp;Anna Sinaiko ,&nbsp;Alon Peltz ,&nbsp;Jon Kingsdale ,&nbsp;Alison A. Galbraith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For consumers without access to employer-sponsored or public insurance, health plan choices in the non-group (individual) insurance market that do not meet consumer needs have the potential for negative downstream implications for health and financial well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This qualitative interview study sought to understand consumers’ experiences and challenges with choosing a non-group health plan, among those who later had negative experiences with the plan they chose.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with a purposive sample of 36 participants from a large regional health insurance carrier in three states who enrolled in non-group plans in 2017 (21 in Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace plans and 15 enrolled off-Marketplace). Participants were included if they reported negative experiences using their plan after enrollment, such as higher-than-expected medical costs. Interviews explored challenges choosing a plan; information needed for choosing; usefulness of available tools; and preferred format for interventions to improve plan choice experiences. We analyzed interview transcripts using thematic content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study participants reported experiencing substantial challenges to choosing an insurance plan. Key barriers included understanding insurance terms, finding relevant information, and making comparisons across plans. Participants valued the ability to make comparisons across carriers when using the Marketplace websites but were less satisfied with customer service. Suggestions for improvement included greater standardization of plans and language and availability of customized one-on-one assistance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings from this study suggest that health plan selection in the non-group market presents challenges to consumers that may be addressed through enrollment assistance and improved presentation of information. Personalized assistance to find and choose coverage may lead to plan choices that better meet consumer needs and increase confidence choosing a plan in subsequent enrollment periods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000242/pdfft?md5=ecf805ebaba2f51b65f49272058ede82&pid=1-s2.0-S2590229623000242-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于无法获得雇主赞助或公共保险的消费者,在非团体(个人)保险市场中选择的健康计划不能满足消费者的需求,可能会对健康和财务状况产生负面的下游影响。目的本定性访谈研究旨在了解消费者在选择非团体健康计划时的经历和挑战,这些消费者后来对他们选择的计划有负面经历。方法我们对来自三个州的大型区域性医疗保险公司的36名参与者进行了半结构化的电话访谈,这些参与者于2017年参加了非团体计划(21人参加了平价医疗法案(ACA)市场计划,15人参加了非市场计划)。如果参与者在注册后报告了使用该计划的负面经历,比如高于预期的医疗费用,他们就会被包括在内。采访探讨了选择计划的挑战;选择所需的信息;可用工具的有用性;以及改善计划选择体验的干预措施的首选格式。我们使用主题内容分析来分析访谈记录。研究参与者报告说,他们在选择保险计划时遇到了很大的挑战。主要的障碍包括理解保险条款、查找相关信息以及在不同计划之间进行比较。在使用Marketplace网站时,参与者更看重不同运营商之间的比较能力,但对客户服务的满意度较低。改进建议包括使计划和语言更加标准化,并提供定制的一对一援助。结论本研究发现,在非团体市场中,健康计划的选择对消费者提出了挑战,可以通过登记协助和改善信息的呈现来解决。寻找和选择保险范围的个性化帮助可能会导致更好地满足消费者需求的计划选择,并增加在随后的登记期间选择计划的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Pick a Plan and Roll the Dice”: A qualitative study of consumer experiences selecting a health plan in the non-group market

Background

For consumers without access to employer-sponsored or public insurance, health plan choices in the non-group (individual) insurance market that do not meet consumer needs have the potential for negative downstream implications for health and financial well-being.

Objective

This qualitative interview study sought to understand consumers’ experiences and challenges with choosing a non-group health plan, among those who later had negative experiences with the plan they chose.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with a purposive sample of 36 participants from a large regional health insurance carrier in three states who enrolled in non-group plans in 2017 (21 in Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace plans and 15 enrolled off-Marketplace). Participants were included if they reported negative experiences using their plan after enrollment, such as higher-than-expected medical costs. Interviews explored challenges choosing a plan; information needed for choosing; usefulness of available tools; and preferred format for interventions to improve plan choice experiences. We analyzed interview transcripts using thematic content analysis.

Results

Study participants reported experiencing substantial challenges to choosing an insurance plan. Key barriers included understanding insurance terms, finding relevant information, and making comparisons across plans. Participants valued the ability to make comparisons across carriers when using the Marketplace websites but were less satisfied with customer service. Suggestions for improvement included greater standardization of plans and language and availability of customized one-on-one assistance.

Conclusion

Findings from this study suggest that health plan selection in the non-group market presents challenges to consumers that may be addressed through enrollment assistance and improved presentation of information. Personalized assistance to find and choose coverage may lead to plan choices that better meet consumer needs and increase confidence choosing a plan in subsequent enrollment periods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信