Gam-COVID-Vac 疫苗鞘内和肌肉注射的免疫原性比较

E. I. Katorkina, I. V. Lyagoskin, E. N. Bocharova, M. V. Bolotnikova, A. A. Borzov, N. V. Belskaya, A. E. Lisova, K. V. Ulyanova, N. K. Kudina, N. A. Belyanina, O. M. Strizhakova, A. S. Pershin, Ya. A. Bahareva, P. E. Kargopolova, A. P. Vasiliev, A. A. Kazarov, M. Lykov, R. A. Khamitov
{"title":"Gam-COVID-Vac 疫苗鞘内和肌肉注射的免疫原性比较","authors":"E. I. Katorkina, I. V. Lyagoskin, E. N. Bocharova, M. V. Bolotnikova, A. A. Borzov, N. V. Belskaya, A. E. Lisova, K. V. Ulyanova, N. K. Kudina, N. A. Belyanina, O. M. Strizhakova, A. S. Pershin, Ya. A. Bahareva, P. E. Kargopolova, A. P. Vasiliev, A. A. Kazarov, M. Lykov, R. A. Khamitov","doi":"10.33647/2074-5982-19-4-56-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we set out to compare the immunogenicity of the Gam-COVID-Vac two-component vaccine produced by GENERIUM JSC (Russia) following its intranasal or intramuscular administration of the first or both components to BALB/c mice. The immunogenicity was evaluated according to antigen-specific IgG and IgA antibodies in the blood and bronchoalveolar fluid, the number of antigen-specific IFN-γ-producing T-lymphocytes, the number of antigen-specific IFN-γ-producing CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes. Intranasal administration was shown to induce the mucosal immunity, significantly exceeding both qualitatively and quantitatively the effect of intramuscular administration (by the number of animals with antigen-specific IgA antibodies and the titer of antibodies in blood serum and bronchoalveolar lavage). At the same time, intramuscular administration slightly exceeded the effect obtained under intranasal administration in terms of the total number of CD8-IFN-γ-producing lymphocytes.","PeriodicalId":14837,"journal":{"name":"Journal Biomed","volume":"47 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Immunogenicity of the Gam-COVID-Vac Vaccine under Intranasal and Intramuscular Administration\",\"authors\":\"E. I. Katorkina, I. V. Lyagoskin, E. N. Bocharova, M. V. Bolotnikova, A. A. Borzov, N. V. Belskaya, A. E. Lisova, K. V. Ulyanova, N. K. Kudina, N. A. Belyanina, O. M. Strizhakova, A. S. Pershin, Ya. A. Bahareva, P. E. Kargopolova, A. P. Vasiliev, A. A. Kazarov, M. Lykov, R. A. Khamitov\",\"doi\":\"10.33647/2074-5982-19-4-56-69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, we set out to compare the immunogenicity of the Gam-COVID-Vac two-component vaccine produced by GENERIUM JSC (Russia) following its intranasal or intramuscular administration of the first or both components to BALB/c mice. The immunogenicity was evaluated according to antigen-specific IgG and IgA antibodies in the blood and bronchoalveolar fluid, the number of antigen-specific IFN-γ-producing T-lymphocytes, the number of antigen-specific IFN-γ-producing CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes. Intranasal administration was shown to induce the mucosal immunity, significantly exceeding both qualitatively and quantitatively the effect of intramuscular administration (by the number of animals with antigen-specific IgA antibodies and the titer of antibodies in blood serum and bronchoalveolar lavage). At the same time, intramuscular administration slightly exceeded the effect obtained under intranasal administration in terms of the total number of CD8-IFN-γ-producing lymphocytes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Biomed\",\"volume\":\"47 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Biomed\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33647/2074-5982-19-4-56-69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Biomed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33647/2074-5982-19-4-56-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,我们着手比较GENERIUM JSC(俄罗斯)生产的Gam-COVID-Vac双组分疫苗在将第一组分或两组分经鼻或肌肉注射给BALB/c小鼠后的免疫原性。免疫原性根据血液和支气管肺泡液中抗原特异性IgG和IgA抗体、抗原特异性产生IFN-γ的t淋巴细胞数量、抗原特异性产生IFN-γ的CD4和CD8 t淋巴细胞数量进行评价。鼻内给药可诱导粘膜免疫,在定性和定量上均显著超过肌内给药(通过血清和支气管肺泡灌洗液中具有抗原特异性IgA抗体的动物数量和抗体滴度)。同时,在产生CD8-IFN-γ的淋巴细胞总数方面,肌内给药的效果略优于鼻内给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Immunogenicity of the Gam-COVID-Vac Vaccine under Intranasal and Intramuscular Administration
In this work, we set out to compare the immunogenicity of the Gam-COVID-Vac two-component vaccine produced by GENERIUM JSC (Russia) following its intranasal or intramuscular administration of the first or both components to BALB/c mice. The immunogenicity was evaluated according to antigen-specific IgG and IgA antibodies in the blood and bronchoalveolar fluid, the number of antigen-specific IFN-γ-producing T-lymphocytes, the number of antigen-specific IFN-γ-producing CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocytes. Intranasal administration was shown to induce the mucosal immunity, significantly exceeding both qualitatively and quantitatively the effect of intramuscular administration (by the number of animals with antigen-specific IgA antibodies and the titer of antibodies in blood serum and bronchoalveolar lavage). At the same time, intramuscular administration slightly exceeded the effect obtained under intranasal administration in terms of the total number of CD8-IFN-γ-producing lymphocytes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信