关于市政秘书的任命和(特别是)免职的两点说明

Jan Malast
{"title":"关于市政秘书的任命和(特别是)免职的两点说明","authors":"Jan Malast","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2023.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a brief reflection on the current views of the Supreme Administrative Court and the Supreme Court on selected issues related to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary of a municipal office. In particular, it focuses on the unclear legal character of the approval given to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary by the director of a regional office, as well as evaluates the long-held view of case law on the application of the time required for the removal of a secretary of the municipal office.","PeriodicalId":158742,"journal":{"name":"AUC IURIDICA","volume":"33 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dvě poznámky ke jmenování a (zejména) odvolávání tajemníka obecního úřadu\",\"authors\":\"Jan Malast\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23366478.2023.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is a brief reflection on the current views of the Supreme Administrative Court and the Supreme Court on selected issues related to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary of a municipal office. In particular, it focuses on the unclear legal character of the approval given to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary by the director of a regional office, as well as evaluates the long-held view of case law on the application of the time required for the removal of a secretary of the municipal office.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AUC IURIDICA\",\"volume\":\"33 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AUC IURIDICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUC IURIDICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文简要回顾了目前最高行政法院和最高法院对市政办公室秘书任命或罢免相关问题的看法。它特别着重于区域办事处主任批准任命或召回一名秘书的不明确的法律性质,并评价了长期以来关于适用解除市办事处秘书职务所需时间的判例法观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dvě poznámky ke jmenování a (zejména) odvolávání tajemníka obecního úřadu
This paper is a brief reflection on the current views of the Supreme Administrative Court and the Supreme Court on selected issues related to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary of a municipal office. In particular, it focuses on the unclear legal character of the approval given to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary by the director of a regional office, as well as evaluates the long-held view of case law on the application of the time required for the removal of a secretary of the municipal office.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信