{"title":"关于市政秘书的任命和(特别是)免职的两点说明","authors":"Jan Malast","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2023.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a brief reflection on the current views of the Supreme Administrative Court and the Supreme Court on selected issues related to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary of a municipal office. In particular, it focuses on the unclear legal character of the approval given to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary by the director of a regional office, as well as evaluates the long-held view of case law on the application of the time required for the removal of a secretary of the municipal office.","PeriodicalId":158742,"journal":{"name":"AUC IURIDICA","volume":"33 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dvě poznámky ke jmenování a (zejména) odvolávání tajemníka obecního úřadu\",\"authors\":\"Jan Malast\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23366478.2023.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is a brief reflection on the current views of the Supreme Administrative Court and the Supreme Court on selected issues related to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary of a municipal office. In particular, it focuses on the unclear legal character of the approval given to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary by the director of a regional office, as well as evaluates the long-held view of case law on the application of the time required for the removal of a secretary of the municipal office.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AUC IURIDICA\",\"volume\":\"33 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AUC IURIDICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUC IURIDICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dvě poznámky ke jmenování a (zejména) odvolávání tajemníka obecního úřadu
This paper is a brief reflection on the current views of the Supreme Administrative Court and the Supreme Court on selected issues related to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary of a municipal office. In particular, it focuses on the unclear legal character of the approval given to the appointment or the recalling of a secretary by the director of a regional office, as well as evaluates the long-held view of case law on the application of the time required for the removal of a secretary of the municipal office.