确定可持续开放数据倡议的模式和建议:对欧洲国家开放政府数据倡议的基准驱动分析

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Martin Lnenicka , Anastasija Nikiforova , Mariusz Luterek , Petar Milic , Daniel Rudmark , Sebastian Neumaier , Caterina Santoro , Cesar Casiano Flores , Marijn Janssen , Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar
{"title":"确定可持续开放数据倡议的模式和建议:对欧洲国家开放政府数据倡议的基准驱动分析","authors":"Martin Lnenicka ,&nbsp;Anastasija Nikiforova ,&nbsp;Mariusz Luterek ,&nbsp;Petar Milic ,&nbsp;Daniel Rudmark ,&nbsp;Sebastian Neumaier ,&nbsp;Caterina Santoro ,&nbsp;Cesar Casiano Flores ,&nbsp;Marijn Janssen ,&nbsp;Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2023.101898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Open government and open (government) data are seen as tools to create new opportunities, eliminate or at least reduce information inequalities and improve public services. More than a decade of these efforts has provided much experience, practices, and perspectives to learn how to better deal with them. This paper focuses on benchmarking of open data initiatives over the years and attempts to identify patterns observed among European countries that could lead to disparities in the development, growth, and sustainability of open data ecosystems. To do this, we studied benchmarks and indices published over the last years (57 editions of 8 artifacts) and conducted a comparative case study of eight European countries, identifying patterns among them considering different potentially relevant contexts such as e-government, open government data, open data indices and rankings, and others relevant for the country under consideration. Using a Delphi method, we reached a consensus within a panel of experts and validated a final list of 94 patterns, including their frequency of occurrence among studied countries and their effects on the respective countries. Finally, we took a closer look at the developments in identified contexts over the years and defined 21 recommendations for more resilient and sustainable open government data initiatives and ecosystems and future steps in this area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"41 1","pages":"Article 101898"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000989/pdfft?md5=58500694dde482ee0a2d355789dfec14&pid=1-s2.0-S0740624X23000989-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying patterns and recommendations of and for sustainable open data initiatives: A benchmarking-driven analysis of open government data initiatives among European countries\",\"authors\":\"Martin Lnenicka ,&nbsp;Anastasija Nikiforova ,&nbsp;Mariusz Luterek ,&nbsp;Petar Milic ,&nbsp;Daniel Rudmark ,&nbsp;Sebastian Neumaier ,&nbsp;Caterina Santoro ,&nbsp;Cesar Casiano Flores ,&nbsp;Marijn Janssen ,&nbsp;Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.giq.2023.101898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Open government and open (government) data are seen as tools to create new opportunities, eliminate or at least reduce information inequalities and improve public services. More than a decade of these efforts has provided much experience, practices, and perspectives to learn how to better deal with them. This paper focuses on benchmarking of open data initiatives over the years and attempts to identify patterns observed among European countries that could lead to disparities in the development, growth, and sustainability of open data ecosystems. To do this, we studied benchmarks and indices published over the last years (57 editions of 8 artifacts) and conducted a comparative case study of eight European countries, identifying patterns among them considering different potentially relevant contexts such as e-government, open government data, open data indices and rankings, and others relevant for the country under consideration. Using a Delphi method, we reached a consensus within a panel of experts and validated a final list of 94 patterns, including their frequency of occurrence among studied countries and their effects on the respective countries. Finally, we took a closer look at the developments in identified contexts over the years and defined 21 recommendations for more resilient and sustainable open government data initiatives and ecosystems and future steps in this area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Government Information Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000989/pdfft?md5=58500694dde482ee0a2d355789dfec14&pid=1-s2.0-S0740624X23000989-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Government Information Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000989\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000989","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开放式政府和开放式(政府)数据被视为创造新机遇、消除或至少减少信息不平等和改善公共服务的工具。十多年来的努力为我们提供了许多经验、做法和观点,让我们了解如何更好地处理这些问题。本文重点关注多年来开放数据计划的基准,并试图找出在欧洲国家间观察到的可能导致开放数据生态系统在发展、增长和可持续性方面存在差异的模式。为此,我们研究了过去几年发布的基准和指数(8 个人工制品的 57 个版本),并对 8 个欧洲国家进行了比较案例研究,在考虑到不同的潜在相关背景(如电子政务、开放政府数据、开放数据指数和排名以及与所考虑国家相关的其他背景)的情况下,确定了它们之间的模式。通过德尔菲法,我们在一个专家小组内达成了共识,并验证了 94 种模式的最终清单,包括它们在所研究国家中出现的频率及其对各自国家的影响。最后,我们仔细研究了多年来所确定环境中的发展情况,并为更具复原力和可持续性的开放式政府数据倡议和生态系统以及该领域的未来步骤确定了 21 项建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying patterns and recommendations of and for sustainable open data initiatives: A benchmarking-driven analysis of open government data initiatives among European countries

Open government and open (government) data are seen as tools to create new opportunities, eliminate or at least reduce information inequalities and improve public services. More than a decade of these efforts has provided much experience, practices, and perspectives to learn how to better deal with them. This paper focuses on benchmarking of open data initiatives over the years and attempts to identify patterns observed among European countries that could lead to disparities in the development, growth, and sustainability of open data ecosystems. To do this, we studied benchmarks and indices published over the last years (57 editions of 8 artifacts) and conducted a comparative case study of eight European countries, identifying patterns among them considering different potentially relevant contexts such as e-government, open government data, open data indices and rankings, and others relevant for the country under consideration. Using a Delphi method, we reached a consensus within a panel of experts and validated a final list of 94 patterns, including their frequency of occurrence among studied countries and their effects on the respective countries. Finally, we took a closer look at the developments in identified contexts over the years and defined 21 recommendations for more resilient and sustainable open government data initiatives and ecosystems and future steps in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信