正畸学家解读元分析导论

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Loukia M Spineli , Nikolaos Pandis
{"title":"正畸学家解读元分析导论","authors":"Loukia M Spineli ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Pandis","doi":"10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evidence synthesis of primary orthodontic studies is crucial in advancing the dental and orthodontic field. The quality of conclusions delivered to the end-users of systematic reviews is contingent upon the appropriateness and diligence of the systematic review methods. The article provides a description of the core components of pairwise meta-analysis, a statistical tool that synthesises the findings of several related primary studies. Emphasis is placed on the features and good selection practices of the available meta-analysis models, proper visualisation of the results and the concept of statistical heterogeneity. A real-life systematic review is used to exemplify the introduced methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48688,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Orthodontics","volume":"30 1","pages":"Pages 50-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623001159/pdfft?md5=094322e2b62b72794be3347e6827f8ce&pid=1-s2.0-S1073874623001159-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An introduction to interpreting meta-analyses for orthodontists\",\"authors\":\"Loukia M Spineli ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Pandis\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sodo.2023.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Evidence synthesis of primary orthodontic studies is crucial in advancing the dental and orthodontic field. The quality of conclusions delivered to the end-users of systematic reviews is contingent upon the appropriateness and diligence of the systematic review methods. The article provides a description of the core components of pairwise meta-analysis, a statistical tool that synthesises the findings of several related primary studies. Emphasis is placed on the features and good selection practices of the available meta-analysis models, proper visualisation of the results and the concept of statistical heterogeneity. A real-life systematic review is used to exemplify the introduced methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 50-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623001159/pdfft?md5=094322e2b62b72794be3347e6827f8ce&pid=1-s2.0-S1073874623001159-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623001159\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874623001159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原始正畸研究的证据综合对于推动牙科和正畸领域的发展至关重要。向系统综述的最终用户提供的结论的质量取决于系统综述方法的适当性和严谨性。本文介绍了配对荟萃分析的核心内容,这是一种综合多项相关主要研究结果的统计工具。文章重点介绍了现有荟萃分析模型的特点和良好的选择方法、结果的正确可视化以及统计异质性的概念。通过一篇真实的系统综述来示范所介绍的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An introduction to interpreting meta-analyses for orthodontists

Evidence synthesis of primary orthodontic studies is crucial in advancing the dental and orthodontic field. The quality of conclusions delivered to the end-users of systematic reviews is contingent upon the appropriateness and diligence of the systematic review methods. The article provides a description of the core components of pairwise meta-analysis, a statistical tool that synthesises the findings of several related primary studies. Emphasis is placed on the features and good selection practices of the available meta-analysis models, proper visualisation of the results and the concept of statistical heterogeneity. A real-life systematic review is used to exemplify the introduced methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Orthodontics
Seminars in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
10 days
期刊介绍: Each issue provides up-to-date, state-of-the-art information on a single topic in orthodontics. Readers are kept abreast of the latest innovations, research findings, clinical applications and clinical methods. Collection of the issues will provide invaluable reference material for present and future review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信