非法器官交易网络的社会网络分析:梅迪库斯案

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Joshua Nielsen, Abu Bakkar Siddique, Meng-Hao Li, Monica Gentili, Seán Columb, Guadalupe Correa-Cabrera, Naoru Koizumi
{"title":"非法器官交易网络的社会网络分析:梅迪库斯案","authors":"Joshua Nielsen, Abu Bakkar Siddique, Meng-Hao Li, Monica Gentili, Seán Columb, Guadalupe Correa-Cabrera, Naoru Koizumi","doi":"10.1007/s12117-023-09513-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organ trafficking has been receiving more attention in recent years as its association with transnational crime organizations became evident. Most of the academic studies available on this topic are qualitative case studies, descriptively analyzing the nature of the crime and the agents involved. These studies often highlight the unique nature of organ trafficking, which is the involvement of medical service providers in the network. There have been, however, no effort made to examine the connections between medical service providers and other agents in the network in a quantitative fashion. This study presents unique quantitative data extracted from the “Medicus case”, a well-documented court case involving kidney trafficking that surfaced in Pristina, Kosovo, in 2008. Social Network Analysis (SNA) was employed to quantitatively analyze the structure and characteristics of the kidney trafficking network. The results reveal that there was a significant variation in the level of involvement in kidney trafficking both across and within different types of agents. Notably, medical staff, facilities, and brokers played vital roles in the kidney trafficking network. Moreover, kidney sellers held a more prominent role than kidney buyers, with certain sellers playing particularly influential roles. In sum, this study demonstrates the promise of SNA as a tool for understanding kidney trafficking networks, and that further research is warranted to fully explore its potential in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":51733,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Organized Crime","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social network analysis of illicit organ trading networks: The Medicus case\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Nielsen, Abu Bakkar Siddique, Meng-Hao Li, Monica Gentili, Seán Columb, Guadalupe Correa-Cabrera, Naoru Koizumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12117-023-09513-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Organ trafficking has been receiving more attention in recent years as its association with transnational crime organizations became evident. Most of the academic studies available on this topic are qualitative case studies, descriptively analyzing the nature of the crime and the agents involved. These studies often highlight the unique nature of organ trafficking, which is the involvement of medical service providers in the network. There have been, however, no effort made to examine the connections between medical service providers and other agents in the network in a quantitative fashion. This study presents unique quantitative data extracted from the “Medicus case”, a well-documented court case involving kidney trafficking that surfaced in Pristina, Kosovo, in 2008. Social Network Analysis (SNA) was employed to quantitatively analyze the structure and characteristics of the kidney trafficking network. The results reveal that there was a significant variation in the level of involvement in kidney trafficking both across and within different types of agents. Notably, medical staff, facilities, and brokers played vital roles in the kidney trafficking network. Moreover, kidney sellers held a more prominent role than kidney buyers, with certain sellers playing particularly influential roles. In sum, this study demonstrates the promise of SNA as a tool for understanding kidney trafficking networks, and that further research is warranted to fully explore its potential in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Organized Crime\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Organized Crime\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-023-09513-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Organized Crime","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-023-09513-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,随着器官贩运与跨国犯罪组织的联系变得明显,它受到了越来越多的关注。关于这一主题的大多数学术研究都是定性的案例研究,描述性地分析犯罪的性质和所涉及的代理人。这些研究往往突出器官贩运的独特性质,即医疗服务提供者参与该网络。然而,一直没有努力以定量的方式检查医疗服务提供者和网络中其他代理人之间的联系。本研究提供了从“梅迪库斯案”中提取的独特定量数据,这是2008年在科索沃普里什蒂纳发生的一起涉及肾脏贩运的法庭案件,有充分的记录。采用社会网络分析(Social Network Analysis, SNA)对肾走私网络的结构和特征进行定量分析。结果表明,在不同类型的代理人之间和内部,参与肾脏贩运的程度有显著差异。值得注意的是,医务人员、设施和经纪人在肾脏贩运网络中发挥了至关重要的作用。此外,肾脏卖方的作用比肾脏买方更为突出,某些卖方的作用尤为重要。总之,本研究证明了SNA作为了解肾脏贩运网络的工具的前景,并且有必要进一步研究以充分挖掘其在该领域的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Social network analysis of illicit organ trading networks: The Medicus case

Social network analysis of illicit organ trading networks: The Medicus case

Organ trafficking has been receiving more attention in recent years as its association with transnational crime organizations became evident. Most of the academic studies available on this topic are qualitative case studies, descriptively analyzing the nature of the crime and the agents involved. These studies often highlight the unique nature of organ trafficking, which is the involvement of medical service providers in the network. There have been, however, no effort made to examine the connections between medical service providers and other agents in the network in a quantitative fashion. This study presents unique quantitative data extracted from the “Medicus case”, a well-documented court case involving kidney trafficking that surfaced in Pristina, Kosovo, in 2008. Social Network Analysis (SNA) was employed to quantitatively analyze the structure and characteristics of the kidney trafficking network. The results reveal that there was a significant variation in the level of involvement in kidney trafficking both across and within different types of agents. Notably, medical staff, facilities, and brokers played vital roles in the kidney trafficking network. Moreover, kidney sellers held a more prominent role than kidney buyers, with certain sellers playing particularly influential roles. In sum, this study demonstrates the promise of SNA as a tool for understanding kidney trafficking networks, and that further research is warranted to fully explore its potential in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Organized Crime
Trends in Organized Crime CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Trends in Organized Crime offers a composite of analyses and syntheses from a variety of information sources to serve the interests of both practitioners and policy makers, as well as the academic community. It is both a stimulus to and a forum for more rigorous empirical research on organized crime.  Trends in Organized Crime publishes peer-reviewed, original research articles and excerpts from significant governmental reports. It also offers reviews of major new books and presents analyses and commentary on current issues in organized crime.  Trends in Organized Crime is published in association with the International Association for the Study of Organized Crime (IASOC). For more information on IASOC please visit http://www.iasoc.net/
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信