格劳秀斯论报复

IF 1.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Grotiana Pub Date : 2020-12-17 DOI:10.1163/18760759-41020005
Randall Lesaffer
{"title":"格劳秀斯论报复","authors":"Randall Lesaffer","doi":"10.1163/18760759-41020005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In neither of his two major forays into the laws of war and peace – <em>De iure praedae</em> or <em>De iure belli ac pacis</em> – did Hugo Grotius discuss the legal institutions of reprisal – whether special or general – or privateering in their own right. His profoundly novel reading of the just war doctrine in the context of his theory of natural rights, however, gave powerful legitimisation to the practices of special reprisals, as well as of privateering in times of war and of peace.</p>","PeriodicalId":42132,"journal":{"name":"Grotiana","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grotius on Reprisal\",\"authors\":\"Randall Lesaffer\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18760759-41020005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In neither of his two major forays into the laws of war and peace – <em>De iure praedae</em> or <em>De iure belli ac pacis</em> – did Hugo Grotius discuss the legal institutions of reprisal – whether special or general – or privateering in their own right. His profoundly novel reading of the just war doctrine in the context of his theory of natural rights, however, gave powerful legitimisation to the practices of special reprisals, as well as of privateering in times of war and of peace.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grotiana\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grotiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18760759-41020005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grotiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18760759-41020005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在雨果·格劳秀斯对战争与和平法的两次主要探索中——《先见之明》和《和平之战》——他都没有讨论报复的法律制度——无论是特殊的还是一般的——或者私掠本身的权利。然而,在他的自然权利理论的背景下,他对正义战争理论的深刻新颖的解读,给了特殊报复的实践强有力的合法性,以及在战争和和平时期的私掠行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Grotius on Reprisal

In neither of his two major forays into the laws of war and peace – De iure praedae or De iure belli ac pacis – did Hugo Grotius discuss the legal institutions of reprisal – whether special or general – or privateering in their own right. His profoundly novel reading of the just war doctrine in the context of his theory of natural rights, however, gave powerful legitimisation to the practices of special reprisals, as well as of privateering in times of war and of peace.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Grotiana
Grotiana HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
80.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Grotiana appears under the auspices of the Grotiana Foundation. The journal’s leading objective is the furtherance of the Grotian tradition. It will welcome any relevant contribution to a better understanding of Grotius’ life and works. At the same time close attention will be paid to Grotius’ relevance for present-day thinking about world problems. Grotiana therefore intends to be a forum for exchanges concerning the philosophical, ethical and legal fundamentals of the search for an international order. The journal is to be published annually. At intervals thematic issues will be inserted. The preferred language for papers and reviews is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信