Andrew Gillen, Cheryl Carrico, Jake Grohs, Holly Matusovich
{"title":"使用应用研究-实践周期:文化相关工程拓展的迭代改进","authors":"Andrew Gillen, Cheryl Carrico, Jake Grohs, Holly Matusovich","doi":"10.1007/s41686-018-0023-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By recognizing disconnects between practitioner conceptions of engineering outreach with young people (specifically a lack of focus on cultural relevance), and researcher conceptions of a culturally relevant approach to engineering outreach, we set out to bridge theory and practice by iteratively designing and implementing interventions. We engaged in a cycle of research-informed practice and practice-informed research to develop more culturally relevant approaches to broadening participation in engineering. Research-based findings focused on the importance of understanding common misconceptions of engineering that intervention participants and facilitators may possess. Such understanding enables iterative improvement of activities and research instruments that yield meaningful results. Practice-based insights included findings regarding intervention structure such as needs for different facilitator-to-student ratios for different age groups, and providing volunteer facilitators with a list of “helpful hints” to consider and/or open-ended questions to ask.","PeriodicalId":73753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of formative design in learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using an Applied Research-Practice Cycle: Iterative Improvement of Culturally Relevant Engineering Outreach\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Gillen, Cheryl Carrico, Jake Grohs, Holly Matusovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41686-018-0023-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By recognizing disconnects between practitioner conceptions of engineering outreach with young people (specifically a lack of focus on cultural relevance), and researcher conceptions of a culturally relevant approach to engineering outreach, we set out to bridge theory and practice by iteratively designing and implementing interventions. We engaged in a cycle of research-informed practice and practice-informed research to develop more culturally relevant approaches to broadening participation in engineering. Research-based findings focused on the importance of understanding common misconceptions of engineering that intervention participants and facilitators may possess. Such understanding enables iterative improvement of activities and research instruments that yield meaningful results. Practice-based insights included findings regarding intervention structure such as needs for different facilitator-to-student ratios for different age groups, and providing volunteer facilitators with a list of “helpful hints” to consider and/or open-ended questions to ask.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of formative design in learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of formative design in learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-018-0023-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of formative design in learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-018-0023-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using an Applied Research-Practice Cycle: Iterative Improvement of Culturally Relevant Engineering Outreach
By recognizing disconnects between practitioner conceptions of engineering outreach with young people (specifically a lack of focus on cultural relevance), and researcher conceptions of a culturally relevant approach to engineering outreach, we set out to bridge theory and practice by iteratively designing and implementing interventions. We engaged in a cycle of research-informed practice and practice-informed research to develop more culturally relevant approaches to broadening participation in engineering. Research-based findings focused on the importance of understanding common misconceptions of engineering that intervention participants and facilitators may possess. Such understanding enables iterative improvement of activities and research instruments that yield meaningful results. Practice-based insights included findings regarding intervention structure such as needs for different facilitator-to-student ratios for different age groups, and providing volunteer facilitators with a list of “helpful hints” to consider and/or open-ended questions to ask.