通过集成六西格玛设计方法,推进业务流程管理生命周期的实施

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jamison V. Kovach, Teresa Cardoso-Grilo, Madalena Cardoso, Sofia Kalakou, Ana Lúcia Martins
{"title":"通过集成六西格玛设计方法,推进业务流程管理生命周期的实施","authors":"Jamison V. Kovach, Teresa Cardoso-Grilo, Madalena Cardoso, Sofia Kalakou, Ana Lúcia Martins","doi":"10.1108/bpmj-05-2023-0333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p> This research proposes how Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) provides a complementary approach for business process management (BPM) lifecycle implementation in order to address gaps identified in the current literature.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p> The mandatory elements of a method (MEM) framework is used to illustrate DFSS's maturity as a process redesign method. The use of DFSS in a BPM context is described through several action research case examples.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p> This research specifies the procedure model (order of development activities), techniques, results, roles and information/meta model (conceptual data model of results) associated with using DFSS to address BPM-related challenges. The action research case examples provided discuss the details of implementing BPM using DFSS to design, implement and test redesigned processes to ensure they fulfill the needs of process participants.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p> While the case examples discussed were performed in only a few settings, which limits the generalizability of their results, they provide evidence regarding the wide range of domains in which the proposed DFSS-BPM approach can be applied and how the tools are used in different contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p> This research offers a road map for addressing the challenges practitioners often face with BPM lifecycle implementation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research provides the first attempt to integrate DFSS as a complementary method for BPM lifecycle implementation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47964,"journal":{"name":"Business Process Management Journal","volume":"186 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing business process management lifecycle implementation through the integration of the design for Six Sigma method\",\"authors\":\"Jamison V. Kovach, Teresa Cardoso-Grilo, Madalena Cardoso, Sofia Kalakou, Ana Lúcia Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bpmj-05-2023-0333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p> This research proposes how Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) provides a complementary approach for business process management (BPM) lifecycle implementation in order to address gaps identified in the current literature.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p> The mandatory elements of a method (MEM) framework is used to illustrate DFSS's maturity as a process redesign method. The use of DFSS in a BPM context is described through several action research case examples.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p> This research specifies the procedure model (order of development activities), techniques, results, roles and information/meta model (conceptual data model of results) associated with using DFSS to address BPM-related challenges. The action research case examples provided discuss the details of implementing BPM using DFSS to design, implement and test redesigned processes to ensure they fulfill the needs of process participants.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p> While the case examples discussed were performed in only a few settings, which limits the generalizability of their results, they provide evidence regarding the wide range of domains in which the proposed DFSS-BPM approach can be applied and how the tools are used in different contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p> This research offers a road map for addressing the challenges practitioners often face with BPM lifecycle implementation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This research provides the first attempt to integrate DFSS as a complementary method for BPM lifecycle implementation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"186 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-05-2023-0333\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Process Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-05-2023-0333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了六西格玛设计(DFSS)如何为业务流程管理(BPM)生命周期实施提供一种补充方法,以解决当前文献中发现的差距。设计/方法学/方法方法框架的强制性要素(MEM)用于说明DFSS作为过程重新设计方法的成熟度。通过几个行动研究案例示例描述了DFSS在BPM上下文中的使用。本研究详细说明了与使用DFSS解决bpm相关挑战相关的过程模型(开发活动的顺序)、技术、结果、角色和信息/元模型(结果的概念数据模型)。提供的行动研究案例示例讨论了使用DFSS实现BPM的细节,以设计、实现和测试重新设计的流程,以确保它们满足流程参与者的需求。虽然所讨论的案例示例仅在少数设置中执行,这限制了其结果的通用性,但它们提供了关于所建议的DFSS-BPM方法可以应用的广泛领域以及如何在不同上下文中使用这些工具的证据。本研究为解决从业者在BPM生命周期实现中经常面临的挑战提供了路线图。原创性/价值本研究首次尝试将DFSS集成为BPM生命周期实现的补充方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing business process management lifecycle implementation through the integration of the design for Six Sigma method

Purpose

This research proposes how Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) provides a complementary approach for business process management (BPM) lifecycle implementation in order to address gaps identified in the current literature.

Design/methodology/approach

The mandatory elements of a method (MEM) framework is used to illustrate DFSS's maturity as a process redesign method. The use of DFSS in a BPM context is described through several action research case examples.

Findings

This research specifies the procedure model (order of development activities), techniques, results, roles and information/meta model (conceptual data model of results) associated with using DFSS to address BPM-related challenges. The action research case examples provided discuss the details of implementing BPM using DFSS to design, implement and test redesigned processes to ensure they fulfill the needs of process participants.

Research limitations/implications

While the case examples discussed were performed in only a few settings, which limits the generalizability of their results, they provide evidence regarding the wide range of domains in which the proposed DFSS-BPM approach can be applied and how the tools are used in different contexts.

Practical implications

This research offers a road map for addressing the challenges practitioners often face with BPM lifecycle implementation.

Originality/value

This research provides the first attempt to integrate DFSS as a complementary method for BPM lifecycle implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Business processes are a fundamental building block of organizational success. Even though effectively managing business process is a key activity for business prosperity, there remain considerable gaps in understanding how to drive efficiency through a process approach. Building a clear and deep understanding of the range process, how they function, and how to manage them is the major challenge facing modern business. Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) examines how a variety of business processes intrinsic to organizational efficiency and effectiveness are integrated and managed for competitive success. BPMJ builds a deep appreciation of how to manage business processes effectively by disseminating best practice. Coverage includes: BPM in eBusiness, eCommerce and eGovernment Web-based enterprise application integration eBPM, ERP, CRM, ASP & SCM Knowledge management and learning organization Methodologies, techniques and tools of business process modeling, analysis and design Techniques of moving from one-shot business process re-engineering to continuous improvement Best practices in BPM Performance management Tools and techniques of change management BPM case studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信