根据钻孔测量估算地应力的约束策略

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Hongxue Han, Mirko van der Baan
{"title":"根据钻孔测量估算地应力的约束策略","authors":"Hongxue Han,&nbsp;Mirko van der Baan","doi":"10.1016/j.gete.2023.100518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we describe strategies to reduce uncertainties in the estimation of in-situ stresses. The strategies are based on the commonly used poro-elastic model with strain corrections for in-situ stress estimation. In addition to the calibration of the minimum horizontal stress magnitudes from measurement data, we further constrain the magnitude of maximum horizontal stress quantitatively with (i) a critical stress state model, (ii) (non)-occurrences of breakout and/or drilling-induced fracture observed from image logs, and (iii) qualitatively with elliptical borehole shapes observed from multi-arm caliper logging data. The methodology is demonstrated using wells near Dawson Creek, Northeast British Columbia and Northwest Alberta, in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). The uncertainty of the estimated maximum horizontal stress magnitude was reduced and the range of the maximum horizontal stress was narrowed after the application of these constraint strategies. It is also observed that in the east of the study area, the in-situ stress regime is a normal fault stress regime. The presence of a normal fault stress regime is unexpected since a strike–slip fault stress regime is typically considered for the entire region. Yet, analysis of caliper data in two horizontal wells has confirmed its presence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56008,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380823000874/pdfft?md5=ff2549edb54a856f61c047c2cfce97cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2352380823000874-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constraint strategies for estimating in-situ stress from borehole measurements\",\"authors\":\"Hongxue Han,&nbsp;Mirko van der Baan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gete.2023.100518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, we describe strategies to reduce uncertainties in the estimation of in-situ stresses. The strategies are based on the commonly used poro-elastic model with strain corrections for in-situ stress estimation. In addition to the calibration of the minimum horizontal stress magnitudes from measurement data, we further constrain the magnitude of maximum horizontal stress quantitatively with (i) a critical stress state model, (ii) (non)-occurrences of breakout and/or drilling-induced fracture observed from image logs, and (iii) qualitatively with elliptical borehole shapes observed from multi-arm caliper logging data. The methodology is demonstrated using wells near Dawson Creek, Northeast British Columbia and Northwest Alberta, in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). The uncertainty of the estimated maximum horizontal stress magnitude was reduced and the range of the maximum horizontal stress was narrowed after the application of these constraint strategies. It is also observed that in the east of the study area, the in-situ stress regime is a normal fault stress regime. The presence of a normal fault stress regime is unexpected since a strike–slip fault stress regime is typically considered for the entire region. Yet, analysis of caliper data in two horizontal wells has confirmed its presence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380823000874/pdfft?md5=ff2549edb54a856f61c047c2cfce97cc&pid=1-s2.0-S2352380823000874-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380823000874\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380823000874","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们描述了在地应力估计中减少不确定性的策略。该策略基于常用的带应变修正的孔隙弹性模型进行地应力估算。除了从测量数据中校准最小水平应力值外,我们还进一步定量地约束了最大水平应力的大小,包括(i)临界应力状态模型,(ii)从图像测井中观察到的(未发生)破裂和/或钻井引起的裂缝,以及(iii)从多臂钳测井数据中观察到的椭圆井眼形状。该方法在加拿大西部沉积盆地(WCSB)的Dawson Creek、不列颠哥伦比亚省东北部和阿尔伯塔省西北部附近的油井中进行了验证。应用这些约束策略后,降低了最大水平应力值估计的不确定性,缩小了最大水平应力的取值范围。研究区东部的地应力状态为正断层应力状态。正常断层应力状态的存在是出乎意料的,因为整个地区通常被认为是走滑断层应力状态。然而,对几口水平井的井径测井数据分析证实了它的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constraint strategies for estimating in-situ stress from borehole measurements

In this study, we describe strategies to reduce uncertainties in the estimation of in-situ stresses. The strategies are based on the commonly used poro-elastic model with strain corrections for in-situ stress estimation. In addition to the calibration of the minimum horizontal stress magnitudes from measurement data, we further constrain the magnitude of maximum horizontal stress quantitatively with (i) a critical stress state model, (ii) (non)-occurrences of breakout and/or drilling-induced fracture observed from image logs, and (iii) qualitatively with elliptical borehole shapes observed from multi-arm caliper logging data. The methodology is demonstrated using wells near Dawson Creek, Northeast British Columbia and Northwest Alberta, in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). The uncertainty of the estimated maximum horizontal stress magnitude was reduced and the range of the maximum horizontal stress was narrowed after the application of these constraint strategies. It is also observed that in the east of the study area, the in-situ stress regime is a normal fault stress regime. The presence of a normal fault stress regime is unexpected since a strike–slip fault stress regime is typically considered for the entire region. Yet, analysis of caliper data in two horizontal wells has confirmed its presence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to publish research results of the highest quality and of lasting importance on the subject of geomechanics, with the focus on applications to geological energy production and storage, and the interaction of soils and rocks with the natural and engineered environment. Special attention is given to concepts and developments of new energy geotechnologies that comprise intrinsic mechanisms protecting the environment against a potential engineering induced damage, hence warranting sustainable usage of energy resources. The scope of the journal is broad, including fundamental concepts in geomechanics and mechanics of porous media, the experiments and analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Of special interest are issues resulting from coupling of particular physics, chemistry and biology of external forcings, as well as of pore fluid/gas and minerals to the solid mechanics of the medium skeleton and pore fluid mechanics. The multi-scale and inter-scale interactions between the phenomena and the behavior representations are also of particular interest. Contributions to general theoretical approach to these issues, but of potential reference to geomechanics in its context of energy and the environment are also most welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信