ChatGPT为非创伤性胸痛患者提供了不一致的风险分层

Thomas F. Heston, Lawrence M. Lewis
{"title":"ChatGPT为非创伤性胸痛患者提供了不一致的风险分层","authors":"Thomas F. Heston, Lawrence M. Lewis","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.29.23299214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>BACKGROUND</strong> ChatGPT is a large language model with promising healthcare applications. However, its ability to analyze complex clinical data and provide consistent results is poorly known. This study evaluated ChatGPT-4’s risk stratification of simulated patients with acute nontraumatic chest pain compared to validated tools.","PeriodicalId":501290,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","volume":"39 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain\",\"authors\":\"Thomas F. Heston, Lawrence M. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.11.29.23299214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>BACKGROUND</strong> ChatGPT is a large language model with promising healthcare applications. However, its ability to analyze complex clinical data and provide consistent results is poorly known. This study evaluated ChatGPT-4’s risk stratification of simulated patients with acute nontraumatic chest pain compared to validated tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.29.23299214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.29.23299214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ChatGPT是一种大型语言模型,具有很好的医疗保健应用程序。然而,其分析复杂临床数据并提供一致结果的能力尚不为人所知。本研究评估了ChatGPT-4对模拟急性非创伤性胸痛患者的风险分层,并与验证工具进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain
BACKGROUND ChatGPT is a large language model with promising healthcare applications. However, its ability to analyze complex clinical data and provide consistent results is poorly known. This study evaluated ChatGPT-4’s risk stratification of simulated patients with acute nontraumatic chest pain compared to validated tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信