适应环境变化:农业与酸雨意外事件计划

IF 5.6 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Nicholas J. Sanders, Alan I. Barreca
{"title":"适应环境变化:农业与酸雨意外事件计划","authors":"Nicholas J. Sanders, Alan I. Barreca","doi":"10.1257/pol.20190060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Acid Rain Program (ARP) cut sulfur dioxide (SO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>) emissions from power plants in the United States, with considerable benefits. We show this also reduced ambient sulfate levels, which lowered agriculture productivity through decreased soil sulfur. Using plant-level SO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions and an atmospheric transport model, we estimate the relationship between airborne sulfate levels and yields for corn and soybeans. We estimate crop revenue losses for these two crops at around $1–$1.5 billion per year, with accompanying decreases in land value. Back-of-the-envelope calculations of the costs to replace lost sulfur suggest producer responses were limited and suboptimal. (JEL Q15, Q24, Q53, Q58)","PeriodicalId":48093,"journal":{"name":"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptation to Environmental Change: Agriculture and the Unexpected Incidence of the Acid Rain Program\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas J. Sanders, Alan I. Barreca\",\"doi\":\"10.1257/pol.20190060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Acid Rain Program (ARP) cut sulfur dioxide (SO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>) emissions from power plants in the United States, with considerable benefits. We show this also reduced ambient sulfate levels, which lowered agriculture productivity through decreased soil sulfur. Using plant-level SO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions and an atmospheric transport model, we estimate the relationship between airborne sulfate levels and yields for corn and soybeans. We estimate crop revenue losses for these two crops at around $1–$1.5 billion per year, with accompanying decreases in land value. Back-of-the-envelope calculations of the costs to replace lost sulfur suggest producer responses were limited and suboptimal. (JEL Q15, Q24, Q53, Q58)\",\"PeriodicalId\":48093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190060\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

酸雨计划(ARP)减少了美国发电厂的二氧化硫(SO2)排放,带来了可观的效益。我们表明,这也降低了环境硫酸盐水平,这降低了农业生产力通过减少土壤硫。利用植物水平的二氧化硫排放和大气运输模型,我们估计了空气中硫酸盐水平与玉米和大豆产量之间的关系。我们估计,这两种作物每年的作物收入损失约为10亿至15亿美元,土地价值也随之下降。对损失硫的替代成本的粗略计算表明,生产商的反应是有限的,而且不是最优的。(jel q15, q24, q53, q58)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptation to Environmental Change: Agriculture and the Unexpected Incidence of the Acid Rain Program
The Acid Rain Program (ARP) cut sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from power plants in the United States, with considerable benefits. We show this also reduced ambient sulfate levels, which lowered agriculture productivity through decreased soil sulfur. Using plant-level SO2 emissions and an atmospheric transport model, we estimate the relationship between airborne sulfate levels and yields for corn and soybeans. We estimate crop revenue losses for these two crops at around $1–$1.5 billion per year, with accompanying decreases in land value. Back-of-the-envelope calculations of the costs to replace lost sulfur suggest producer responses were limited and suboptimal. (JEL Q15, Q24, Q53, Q58)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
1.90%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Economic Review (AER) is a general-interest economics journal. The journal publishes 12 issues containing articles on a broad range of topics. Established in 1911, the AER is among the nation's oldest and most respected scholarly journals in economics. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy publishes papers covering a range of topics, the common theme being the role of economic policy in economic outcomes. Subject areas include public economics; urban and regional economics; public policy aspects of health, education, welfare and political institutions; law and economics; economic regulation; and environmental and natural resource economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信