在黑暗中工作:服务与回归之路

IF 0.7 1区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Suzanne Lye
{"title":"在黑暗中工作:服务与回归之路","authors":"Suzanne Lye","doi":"10.1353/apa.2023.a913463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Working in the Dark:<span>Service and the Path to Return</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Suzanne Lye </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p><span>Ring the bells that still can ring</span><span>Forget your perfect offering</span><span>There is a crack, a crack in everything</span><span>That's how the light gets in.</span></p> —Leonard Cohen, <em>Anthem</em> </blockquote> <p><small>when i was asked to write</small> an essay on the theme of \"Rupture and Return,\" my first reactions were a mix of excitement, confusion, anger, curiosity, gratitude, and—finally—hope. I could not get my head around what expectations a title like \"Rupture and Return\" might mean for someone like me, who has experienced not one but <em>many</em> ruptures over the past few years, which long predate the COVID-19 pandemic. I questioned what people think they might be returning <em>to</em> with eyes newly opened to the difficulties, indignities, and pain many in the academy have long endured. I also questioned whether anyone wants a return to the pre-pandemic status quo. At this point in time, \"repair\" and \"reset\" rather than \"return\" more naturally flow off my tongue after the word \"rupture,\" and I want to propose them as alternatives toward which we might set our sights as we contemplate the idea of return. In this essay, I discuss how I believe we can use service as a form of self-care to make our field a platform on which more people can thrive. I start by explaining why I believe a return is unlikely, undesirable, and impossible. I then share observations on how certain types of individual and collective repair might help us reset our collective trajectory. Finally, using my experiences as a leader and volunteer in service organizations such as the Women's Classical Caucus (WCC), I suggest specific steps for building a practice of service that is personalized, effective, and sustainable, not only for the field but also for us as individuals. <strong>[End Page 325]</strong></p> <h2><small>no turning back</small></h2> <p>First of all, I think we should abandon the idea that we are able to return to a pre-pandemic world. One reason is that we now live in a world wounded by the collective trauma of the pandemic, with new strains of COVID-19 continuing to surge. Even if this were not the case, desiring a return would be a very conservative stance because it would call for reinstating a status quo that served few, in which even the \"winners\" in the hierarchy—senior scholars, permanently employed instructors, tenured professors, charismatic administrators, etc.—seemed unhappy and anxious most of the time, transmitting this vibe along with well-intentioned but sometimes ill-suited advice and caveats to those still struggling to get their footing on the ladder. Even before the pandemic, there were many dire statistics and sad anecdotes about life in academia that we can probably all point to, from reduced funding for the humanities, the lack of diversity in the professoriate and scholarly publications, a barren job market, systemic barriers to advancement by marginalized individuals, exploitative hiring policies in all types of higher education institutions, and untenable service obligations that have increased the number of our colleagues who live in financial and emotional precarity, particularly among those in the early career stages. \"Grind culture\" and burnout were rampant at all levels, and the expectations of our profession were fast becoming unsustainable.</p> <p>The pandemic, in short, did not cause rupture; rather, it shone a light on it and created an opportunity for relentless revelation. When \"business as normal\" went away, we saw the cracks in the leaky jar that we had been frantically trying to fill. Moreover, we got to see who had never had the privilege of normality but had lived for a long time in a state of uncertainty and anxiety, whether over finding a job, keeping a job, or doing their job. At the drop of a hat in March 2020, we were asked to rebuild our courses for an online environment, master new technologies, and be a beacon of light and stability for our students, even while their long-held plans and dreams of adulthood fell to dust, from graduation celebrations to study abroad programs to summer jobs. At the same time, we instructors were being asked to maintain the same professional...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46223,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working in the Dark: Service and the Path to Return\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne Lye\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/apa.2023.a913463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Working in the Dark:<span>Service and the Path to Return</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Suzanne Lye </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p><span>Ring the bells that still can ring</span><span>Forget your perfect offering</span><span>There is a crack, a crack in everything</span><span>That's how the light gets in.</span></p> —Leonard Cohen, <em>Anthem</em> </blockquote> <p><small>when i was asked to write</small> an essay on the theme of \\\"Rupture and Return,\\\" my first reactions were a mix of excitement, confusion, anger, curiosity, gratitude, and—finally—hope. I could not get my head around what expectations a title like \\\"Rupture and Return\\\" might mean for someone like me, who has experienced not one but <em>many</em> ruptures over the past few years, which long predate the COVID-19 pandemic. I questioned what people think they might be returning <em>to</em> with eyes newly opened to the difficulties, indignities, and pain many in the academy have long endured. I also questioned whether anyone wants a return to the pre-pandemic status quo. At this point in time, \\\"repair\\\" and \\\"reset\\\" rather than \\\"return\\\" more naturally flow off my tongue after the word \\\"rupture,\\\" and I want to propose them as alternatives toward which we might set our sights as we contemplate the idea of return. In this essay, I discuss how I believe we can use service as a form of self-care to make our field a platform on which more people can thrive. I start by explaining why I believe a return is unlikely, undesirable, and impossible. I then share observations on how certain types of individual and collective repair might help us reset our collective trajectory. Finally, using my experiences as a leader and volunteer in service organizations such as the Women's Classical Caucus (WCC), I suggest specific steps for building a practice of service that is personalized, effective, and sustainable, not only for the field but also for us as individuals. <strong>[End Page 325]</strong></p> <h2><small>no turning back</small></h2> <p>First of all, I think we should abandon the idea that we are able to return to a pre-pandemic world. One reason is that we now live in a world wounded by the collective trauma of the pandemic, with new strains of COVID-19 continuing to surge. Even if this were not the case, desiring a return would be a very conservative stance because it would call for reinstating a status quo that served few, in which even the \\\"winners\\\" in the hierarchy—senior scholars, permanently employed instructors, tenured professors, charismatic administrators, etc.—seemed unhappy and anxious most of the time, transmitting this vibe along with well-intentioned but sometimes ill-suited advice and caveats to those still struggling to get their footing on the ladder. Even before the pandemic, there were many dire statistics and sad anecdotes about life in academia that we can probably all point to, from reduced funding for the humanities, the lack of diversity in the professoriate and scholarly publications, a barren job market, systemic barriers to advancement by marginalized individuals, exploitative hiring policies in all types of higher education institutions, and untenable service obligations that have increased the number of our colleagues who live in financial and emotional precarity, particularly among those in the early career stages. \\\"Grind culture\\\" and burnout were rampant at all levels, and the expectations of our profession were fast becoming unsustainable.</p> <p>The pandemic, in short, did not cause rupture; rather, it shone a light on it and created an opportunity for relentless revelation. When \\\"business as normal\\\" went away, we saw the cracks in the leaky jar that we had been frantically trying to fill. Moreover, we got to see who had never had the privilege of normality but had lived for a long time in a state of uncertainty and anxiety, whether over finding a job, keeping a job, or doing their job. At the drop of a hat in March 2020, we were asked to rebuild our courses for an online environment, master new technologies, and be a beacon of light and stability for our students, even while their long-held plans and dreams of adulthood fell to dust, from graduation celebrations to study abroad programs to summer jobs. At the same time, we instructors were being asked to maintain the same professional...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the American Philological Association\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the American Philological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/apa.2023.a913463\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Philological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/apa.2023.a913463","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

代替摘要,这里是内容的一个简短的节选:在黑暗中工作:服务和回归之路苏珊娜·莱敲响仍然可以敲响的钟声忘记你完美的奉献每件事都有一个裂缝,一个裂缝,这就是光进入的方式。当我被要求写一篇关于“破裂与回归”主题的文章时,我的第一反应是兴奋、困惑、愤怒、好奇、感激,最后是希望。我无法想象,对于像我这样在过去几年经历了不止一次而是多次破裂的人来说,“破裂与回归”这样的标题可能意味着什么。这些破裂早在COVID-19大流行之前就发生了。我很好奇,当人们重新审视学术界许多人长期忍受的困难、侮辱和痛苦时,他们会怎么想。我还质疑是否有人希望回到大流行前的状态。在这个时间点上,在“破裂”这个词之后,“修复”和“重置”而不是“回归”更自然地从我的舌头上流出,我想把它们作为我们在思考回归的想法时可能会看到的替代方案。在这篇文章中,我讨论了我如何相信我们可以使用服务作为一种自我照顾的形式,使我们的领域成为一个平台,让更多的人可以茁壮成长。我首先解释了为什么我认为回归是不可能的、不受欢迎的、不可能的。然后,我分享了关于某些类型的个人和集体修复如何帮助我们重置我们的集体轨迹的观察。最后,利用我在女性经典核心小组(WCC)等服务组织担任领导者和志愿者的经验,我提出了具体的步骤,以建立个性化、有效和可持续的服务实践,不仅适用于该领域,也适用于我们个人。首先,我认为我们应该放弃那种认为我们能够回到大流行前的世界的想法。原因之一是,我们现在生活在一个受到大流行集体创伤的世界,新型COVID-19病毒继续激增。即使事实并非如此,渴望回归也将是一种非常保守的立场,因为它将要求恢复对少数人有利的现状,在这种现状中,即使是等级制度中的“赢家”——高级学者、永久聘用的教师、终身教授、有魅力的管理者等——在大多数时候似乎也不高兴和焦虑。向那些仍在努力在阶梯上站稳脚跟的人提供善意但有时不合适的建议和警告,同时传递这种氛围。甚至在大流行之前,就有许多关于学术界生活的可怕统计数据和悲伤轶事,我们可能都可以指出,从人文学科的资金减少,教授和学术出版物缺乏多样性,贫瘠的就业市场,边缘化个人晋升的系统性障碍,所有类型的高等教育机构的剥削性招聘政策,无法维持的服务义务增加了我们在经济和情感上不稳定的同事的数量,特别是那些处于职业生涯早期阶段的同事。“刷任务文化”和职业倦怠在各个层面都很猖獗,对我们这个职业的期望很快变得不可持续。简而言之,大流行并没有造成破裂;相反,它照亮了它,创造了一个不断揭示真相的机会。当“一切如常”的日子过去后,我们看到了一直拼命想要填满的漏水的罐子出现了裂缝。此外,我们还看到了那些从未享受过正常生活的人,他们长期生活在不确定和焦虑的状态中,无论是在找工作、保住工作还是做好自己的工作方面。在2020年3月,我们被要求为网络环境重建我们的课程,掌握新技术,成为学生光明和稳定的灯塔,即使他们长期以来的成年计划和梦想,从毕业庆典到出国留学项目到暑期工作,都落空了。与此同时,我们教官被要求保持同样的专业……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Working in the Dark: Service and the Path to Return
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Working in the Dark:Service and the Path to Return
  • Suzanne Lye

Ring the bells that still can ringForget your perfect offeringThere is a crack, a crack in everythingThat's how the light gets in.

—Leonard Cohen, Anthem

when i was asked to write an essay on the theme of "Rupture and Return," my first reactions were a mix of excitement, confusion, anger, curiosity, gratitude, and—finally—hope. I could not get my head around what expectations a title like "Rupture and Return" might mean for someone like me, who has experienced not one but many ruptures over the past few years, which long predate the COVID-19 pandemic. I questioned what people think they might be returning to with eyes newly opened to the difficulties, indignities, and pain many in the academy have long endured. I also questioned whether anyone wants a return to the pre-pandemic status quo. At this point in time, "repair" and "reset" rather than "return" more naturally flow off my tongue after the word "rupture," and I want to propose them as alternatives toward which we might set our sights as we contemplate the idea of return. In this essay, I discuss how I believe we can use service as a form of self-care to make our field a platform on which more people can thrive. I start by explaining why I believe a return is unlikely, undesirable, and impossible. I then share observations on how certain types of individual and collective repair might help us reset our collective trajectory. Finally, using my experiences as a leader and volunteer in service organizations such as the Women's Classical Caucus (WCC), I suggest specific steps for building a practice of service that is personalized, effective, and sustainable, not only for the field but also for us as individuals. [End Page 325]

no turning back

First of all, I think we should abandon the idea that we are able to return to a pre-pandemic world. One reason is that we now live in a world wounded by the collective trauma of the pandemic, with new strains of COVID-19 continuing to surge. Even if this were not the case, desiring a return would be a very conservative stance because it would call for reinstating a status quo that served few, in which even the "winners" in the hierarchy—senior scholars, permanently employed instructors, tenured professors, charismatic administrators, etc.—seemed unhappy and anxious most of the time, transmitting this vibe along with well-intentioned but sometimes ill-suited advice and caveats to those still struggling to get their footing on the ladder. Even before the pandemic, there were many dire statistics and sad anecdotes about life in academia that we can probably all point to, from reduced funding for the humanities, the lack of diversity in the professoriate and scholarly publications, a barren job market, systemic barriers to advancement by marginalized individuals, exploitative hiring policies in all types of higher education institutions, and untenable service obligations that have increased the number of our colleagues who live in financial and emotional precarity, particularly among those in the early career stages. "Grind culture" and burnout were rampant at all levels, and the expectations of our profession were fast becoming unsustainable.

The pandemic, in short, did not cause rupture; rather, it shone a light on it and created an opportunity for relentless revelation. When "business as normal" went away, we saw the cracks in the leaky jar that we had been frantically trying to fill. Moreover, we got to see who had never had the privilege of normality but had lived for a long time in a state of uncertainty and anxiety, whether over finding a job, keeping a job, or doing their job. At the drop of a hat in March 2020, we were asked to rebuild our courses for an online environment, master new technologies, and be a beacon of light and stability for our students, even while their long-held plans and dreams of adulthood fell to dust, from graduation celebrations to study abroad programs to summer jobs. At the same time, we instructors were being asked to maintain the same professional...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Transactions of the APA (TAPA) is the official research publication of the American Philological Association. TAPA reflects the wide range and high quality of research currently undertaken by classicists. Highlights of every issue include: The Presidential Address from the previous year"s conference and Paragraphoi a reflection on the material and response to issues raised in the issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信