导论:国际机构、公共治理和未来工作规则

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Franz Christian Ebert,Tonia Novitz
{"title":"导论:国际机构、公共治理和未来工作规则","authors":"Franz Christian Ebert,Tonia Novitz","doi":"10.1163/15723747-01701001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue takes the centenary of the International Labour Organization as an occasion to reflect on the roles of international institutions in governing labour standards. While at the time of its creation the ILO played a solitary role as the custodian of international labour standards, the culmination of various experiments with international regulation,1 the ILO today is not the only international institution seeking to exercise governance in relation to the world of work. Instead, a number of institutional actors, both at the global and regional level, have emerged in this area, including the World Bank Group, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Council of Europe and the European Union. Their activities can complement but often also compete or even conflict with those of the ILO, of which the economic and financial crisis in the Eurozone is a powerful reminder.2 Meanwhile, the ILO has been struggling to ensure consensus among its tripartite constituents in the Post-Cold War-period and continues to be subject to significant internal conflict.3 Indeed, the ILO","PeriodicalId":42966,"journal":{"name":"International Organizations Law Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: International Institutions, Public Governance and Future Regulation of Work\",\"authors\":\"Franz Christian Ebert,Tonia Novitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15723747-01701001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue takes the centenary of the International Labour Organization as an occasion to reflect on the roles of international institutions in governing labour standards. While at the time of its creation the ILO played a solitary role as the custodian of international labour standards, the culmination of various experiments with international regulation,1 the ILO today is not the only international institution seeking to exercise governance in relation to the world of work. Instead, a number of institutional actors, both at the global and regional level, have emerged in this area, including the World Bank Group, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Council of Europe and the European Union. Their activities can complement but often also compete or even conflict with those of the ILO, of which the economic and financial crisis in the Eurozone is a powerful reminder.2 Meanwhile, the ILO has been struggling to ensure consensus among its tripartite constituents in the Post-Cold War-period and continues to be subject to significant internal conflict.3 Indeed, the ILO\",\"PeriodicalId\":42966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Organizations Law Review\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Organizations Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01701001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Organizations Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01701001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction: International Institutions, Public Governance and Future Regulation of Work
This special issue takes the centenary of the International Labour Organization as an occasion to reflect on the roles of international institutions in governing labour standards. While at the time of its creation the ILO played a solitary role as the custodian of international labour standards, the culmination of various experiments with international regulation,1 the ILO today is not the only international institution seeking to exercise governance in relation to the world of work. Instead, a number of institutional actors, both at the global and regional level, have emerged in this area, including the World Bank Group, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Council of Europe and the European Union. Their activities can complement but often also compete or even conflict with those of the ILO, of which the economic and financial crisis in the Eurozone is a powerful reminder.2 Meanwhile, the ILO has been struggling to ensure consensus among its tripartite constituents in the Post-Cold War-period and continues to be subject to significant internal conflict.3 Indeed, the ILO
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: After the Second World War in particular, the law of international organizations developed as a discipline within public international law. Separate, but not separable. The International Organizations Law Review purports to function as a discussion forum for academics and practitioners active in the field of the law of international organizations. It is based on two pillars; one is based in the world of scholarship, the other in the world of practice. In the first dimension, the Journal focuses on general developments in international institutional law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信