发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

X平台的设计掩盖了对总统社交媒体帖子的不满，而不是反映民意

Q2 Social Sciences
First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1080/27671127.2023.2271526
Kara Alaimo
{"title":"X平台的设计掩盖了对总统社交媒体帖子的不满，而不是反映民意","authors":"Kara Alaimo","doi":"10.1080/27671127.2023.2271526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study calls into question the notion that X (previously known as Twitter) serves as an effective global “town square” for political debates. An analysis of replies to the posts of former U.S. ...","PeriodicalId":37756,"journal":{"name":"First Amendment Studies","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of X’s platform masks discontent with presidential social media posts instead of reflecting public opinion\",\"authors\":\"Kara Alaimo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/27671127.2023.2271526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study calls into question the notion that X (previously known as Twitter) serves as an effective global “town square” for political debates. An analysis of replies to the posts of former U.S. ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":37756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First Amendment Studies\",\"volume\":\"6 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First Amendment Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2023.2271526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Amendment Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2023.2271526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究对X(以前称为Twitter)作为政治辩论的有效全球“城市广场”的概念提出了质疑。对前美国人帖子的回复分析. ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文 本刊更多论文
Design of X’s platform masks discontent with presidential social media posts instead of reflecting public opinion
This study calls into question the notion that X (previously known as Twitter) serves as an effective global “town square” for political debates. An analysis of replies to the posts of former U.S. ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
First Amendment Studies
First Amendment Studies Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍： First Amendment Studies publishes original scholarship on all aspects of free speech and embraces the full range of critical, historical, empirical, and descriptive methodologies. First Amendment Studies welcomes scholarship addressing areas including but not limited to: • doctrinal analysis of international and national free speech law and legislation • rhetorical analysis of cases and judicial rhetoric • theoretical and cultural issues related to free speech • the role of free speech in a wide variety of contexts (e.g., organizations, popular culture, traditional and new media).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信