X平台的设计掩盖了对总统社交媒体帖子的不满，而不是反映民意

Q2 Social Sciences

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1080/27671127.2023.2271526

Kara Alaimo

引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究对X(以前称为Twitter)作为政治辩论的有效全球“城市广场”的概念提出了质疑。对前美国人帖子的回复分析. ...

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Design of X’s platform masks discontent with presidential social media posts instead of reflecting public opinion

This study calls into question the notion that X (previously known as Twitter) serves as an effective global “town square” for political debates. An analysis of replies to the posts of former U.S. ...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

First Amendment Studies Social Sciences-Law

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： First Amendment Studies publishes original scholarship on all aspects of free speech and embraces the full range of critical, historical, empirical, and descriptive methodologies. First Amendment Studies welcomes scholarship addressing areas including but not limited to: • doctrinal analysis of international and national free speech law and legislation • rhetorical analysis of cases and judicial rhetoric • theoretical and cultural issues related to free speech • the role of free speech in a wide variety of contexts (e.g., organizations, popular culture, traditional and new media).