婴儿和学龄前儿童全家庭评估和干预的虚拟护理交付:临床医生和家庭经验的专题分析

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Diane A. Philipp, Klaudia Szczech, Nick L. Hanson, Gabrielle O'Hara, Janai Puckett
{"title":"婴儿和学龄前儿童全家庭评估和干预的虚拟护理交付:临床医生和家庭经验的专题分析","authors":"Diane A. Philipp,&nbsp;Klaudia Szczech,&nbsp;Nick L. Hanson,&nbsp;Gabrielle O'Hara,&nbsp;Janai Puckett","doi":"10.1002/anzf.1557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we explore family and clinician experiences with virtual care delivery of whole family assessment and therapy developed for infant and preschool-aged children and adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic. A clinical case study is also presented. Between September and November 2020, semi-structured interviews were conducted with four clinicians working with families with children in the 0 to 5 population and with four caregivers with children aged 4–6 years (<i>M</i> = 5.3) involved in whole family assessment and intervention (i.e., Lausanne Trilogue Play [LTP]; Reflective Family Play [RFP]) at a community mental health facility. Clinicians represented various mental health disciplines. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis with intercoder reliability established. Analysis of interviews generated nine themes organised within two conceptual frameworks, accessibility and efficacy. Accessibility included the themes: (1) flexibility, (2) privacy, and (3) resources. Efficacy comprised: (4) effects of technology, (5) home environment, (6) feasibility of therapy tasks, (7) parent alliance, (8) clinician fatigue, and (9) overall evaluation. Home environment was further divided into three subthemes: (5.1) disruptions, (5.2) boundaries, and (5.3) naturalistic observation. While participants reported benefits and challenges uniquely related to virtual care, both caregivers and clinicians expressed overall satisfaction with virtual whole family assessment and therapy. This study provides a rich exploration of the perspectives of caregivers and clinicians engaged in virtual whole family mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. With adequate technology and privacy, whole family assessment and therapy, such as the LTP and RFP, provided via video teleconferencing facilitated accessible and effective care for families of young children with moderate to severe mental health challenges. Evidence suggests in-person and hybrid approaches to whole family assessment and therapy could be further tailored to meet the needs of families with young children and infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":51763,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/anzf.1557","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual care delivery of whole family assessment and intervention with infants and preschoolers: a thematic analysis of clinician and family experiences\",\"authors\":\"Diane A. Philipp,&nbsp;Klaudia Szczech,&nbsp;Nick L. Hanson,&nbsp;Gabrielle O'Hara,&nbsp;Janai Puckett\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/anzf.1557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this study, we explore family and clinician experiences with virtual care delivery of whole family assessment and therapy developed for infant and preschool-aged children and adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic. A clinical case study is also presented. Between September and November 2020, semi-structured interviews were conducted with four clinicians working with families with children in the 0 to 5 population and with four caregivers with children aged 4–6 years (<i>M</i> = 5.3) involved in whole family assessment and intervention (i.e., Lausanne Trilogue Play [LTP]; Reflective Family Play [RFP]) at a community mental health facility. Clinicians represented various mental health disciplines. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis with intercoder reliability established. Analysis of interviews generated nine themes organised within two conceptual frameworks, accessibility and efficacy. Accessibility included the themes: (1) flexibility, (2) privacy, and (3) resources. Efficacy comprised: (4) effects of technology, (5) home environment, (6) feasibility of therapy tasks, (7) parent alliance, (8) clinician fatigue, and (9) overall evaluation. Home environment was further divided into three subthemes: (5.1) disruptions, (5.2) boundaries, and (5.3) naturalistic observation. While participants reported benefits and challenges uniquely related to virtual care, both caregivers and clinicians expressed overall satisfaction with virtual whole family assessment and therapy. This study provides a rich exploration of the perspectives of caregivers and clinicians engaged in virtual whole family mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. With adequate technology and privacy, whole family assessment and therapy, such as the LTP and RFP, provided via video teleconferencing facilitated accessible and effective care for families of young children with moderate to severe mental health challenges. Evidence suggests in-person and hybrid approaches to whole family assessment and therapy could be further tailored to meet the needs of families with young children and infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/anzf.1557\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anzf.1557\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anzf.1557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们探讨了家庭和临床医生在为婴儿和学龄前儿童开发并在COVID-19大流行期间进行调整的全家庭评估和治疗的虚拟护理提供方面的经验。本文还介绍了一个临床病例研究。在2020年9月至11月期间,对4名与0至5岁人群中有儿童的家庭合作的临床医生和4名4-6岁儿童的照顾者(M = 5.3)进行了半结构化访谈,参与了全家庭评估和干预(即洛桑三部曲游戏[LTP];反思家庭游戏[RFP])在社区精神卫生机构。临床医生代表不同的心理健康学科。定性数据采用归纳主题分析法进行分析,并建立了编码间的可靠性。对访谈的分析产生了在可及性和有效性两个概念框架内组织的九个主题。可访问性包括以下主题:(1)灵活性,(2)隐私性,(3)资源。疗效包括:(4)技术效果、(5)家庭环境、(6)治疗任务可行性、(7)家长联盟、(8)临床医生疲劳程度、(9)综合评价。家庭环境进一步分为三个子主题:(5.1)破坏,(5.2)边界和(5.3)自然观察。虽然参与者报告了与虚拟护理独特相关的益处和挑战,但护理人员和临床医生都对虚拟全家庭评估和治疗表示总体满意。本研究对COVID-19大流行期间从事虚拟全家庭精神卫生保健的护理人员和临床医生的观点进行了丰富的探索。有了适当的技术和隐私,通过视频电话会议提供的全家庭评估和治疗,如LTP和RFP,为患有中度至重度精神健康挑战的幼儿家庭提供了便利和有效的护理。有证据表明,可以进一步调整整个家庭评估和治疗的面对面和混合方法,以满足有幼儿和婴儿的家庭的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Virtual care delivery of whole family assessment and intervention with infants and preschoolers: a thematic analysis of clinician and family experiences

Virtual care delivery of whole family assessment and intervention with infants and preschoolers: a thematic analysis of clinician and family experiences

In this study, we explore family and clinician experiences with virtual care delivery of whole family assessment and therapy developed for infant and preschool-aged children and adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic. A clinical case study is also presented. Between September and November 2020, semi-structured interviews were conducted with four clinicians working with families with children in the 0 to 5 population and with four caregivers with children aged 4–6 years (M = 5.3) involved in whole family assessment and intervention (i.e., Lausanne Trilogue Play [LTP]; Reflective Family Play [RFP]) at a community mental health facility. Clinicians represented various mental health disciplines. Qualitative data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis with intercoder reliability established. Analysis of interviews generated nine themes organised within two conceptual frameworks, accessibility and efficacy. Accessibility included the themes: (1) flexibility, (2) privacy, and (3) resources. Efficacy comprised: (4) effects of technology, (5) home environment, (6) feasibility of therapy tasks, (7) parent alliance, (8) clinician fatigue, and (9) overall evaluation. Home environment was further divided into three subthemes: (5.1) disruptions, (5.2) boundaries, and (5.3) naturalistic observation. While participants reported benefits and challenges uniquely related to virtual care, both caregivers and clinicians expressed overall satisfaction with virtual whole family assessment and therapy. This study provides a rich exploration of the perspectives of caregivers and clinicians engaged in virtual whole family mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. With adequate technology and privacy, whole family assessment and therapy, such as the LTP and RFP, provided via video teleconferencing facilitated accessible and effective care for families of young children with moderate to severe mental health challenges. Evidence suggests in-person and hybrid approaches to whole family assessment and therapy could be further tailored to meet the needs of families with young children and infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The ANZJFT is reputed to be the most-stolen professional journal in Australia! It is read by clinicians as well as by academics, and each issue includes substantial papers reflecting original perspectives on theory and practice. A lively magazine section keeps its finger on the pulse of family therapy in Australia and New Zealand via local correspondents, and four Foreign Correspondents report on developments in the US and Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信