心力衰竭循环生物标志物的性别差异。

IF 3.8 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Current Heart Failure Reports Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1007/s11897-023-00634-w
Roopa A Rao, Anju Bhardwaj, Mrudula Munagala, Sonu Abraham, Sanjana Adig, Arden Shen, Eman Hamad
{"title":"心力衰竭循环生物标志物的性别差异。","authors":"Roopa A Rao, Anju Bhardwaj, Mrudula Munagala, Sonu Abraham, Sanjana Adig, Arden Shen, Eman Hamad","doi":"10.1007/s11897-023-00634-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of revsiew: </strong>Evidence is scaling up for sex differences in heart failure; however, clinical relevance of sex-specific differential thresholds for biomarkers is not clearly known. Current ambiguity warrants a further look into the sex-specific studies on cardiac biomarkers and may facilitate understanding of phenotypic presentations, clinical manifestations, and pathophysiologic pathway differences in men and women.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have confirmed the fact that females have differential threshold for biomarkers, with lower troponin and higher NT proBNP levels. Ambiguity continues to exist in the clinical relevance of ST-2, Galectin 3, and other biomarkers. Novel biomarkers, proteomic biomarkers, and circulating micro RNAs with machine learning are actively being explored. Biomarkers in HFpEF patients with higher female representation are evolving. In recent clinical trials, sex-related difference in biomarkers is not seen despite therapeutic intervention being more effective in females compared to males. Sex-related difference exists in the expression of biomarkers in health and in various disease states of heart failure. However, this differentiation has not effectively translated into the clinical practice in terms of diagnostic studies or prognostication. Active exploration to bridge the knowledge gap and novel technologies can shed more light in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":10830,"journal":{"name":"Current Heart Failure Reports","volume":" ","pages":"11-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Differences in Circulating Biomarkers of Heart Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Roopa A Rao, Anju Bhardwaj, Mrudula Munagala, Sonu Abraham, Sanjana Adig, Arden Shen, Eman Hamad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11897-023-00634-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of revsiew: </strong>Evidence is scaling up for sex differences in heart failure; however, clinical relevance of sex-specific differential thresholds for biomarkers is not clearly known. Current ambiguity warrants a further look into the sex-specific studies on cardiac biomarkers and may facilitate understanding of phenotypic presentations, clinical manifestations, and pathophysiologic pathway differences in men and women.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have confirmed the fact that females have differential threshold for biomarkers, with lower troponin and higher NT proBNP levels. Ambiguity continues to exist in the clinical relevance of ST-2, Galectin 3, and other biomarkers. Novel biomarkers, proteomic biomarkers, and circulating micro RNAs with machine learning are actively being explored. Biomarkers in HFpEF patients with higher female representation are evolving. In recent clinical trials, sex-related difference in biomarkers is not seen despite therapeutic intervention being more effective in females compared to males. Sex-related difference exists in the expression of biomarkers in health and in various disease states of heart failure. However, this differentiation has not effectively translated into the clinical practice in terms of diagnostic studies or prognostication. Active exploration to bridge the knowledge gap and novel technologies can shed more light in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Heart Failure Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Heart Failure Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-023-00634-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Heart Failure Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-023-00634-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:心力衰竭性别差异的证据越来越多;然而,生物标志物的性别特异性差异阈值的临床相关性尚不清楚。目前的模糊性保证了对心脏生物标志物的性别特异性研究的进一步研究,并可能有助于理解男女之间的表型表现、临床表现和病理生理途径差异。最近的发现:最近的研究证实了这样一个事实,即女性具有不同的生物标志物阈值,肌钙蛋白较低,NT proBNP水平较高。ST-2、半乳糖凝集素3和其他生物标志物的临床相关性仍然存在歧义。新的生物标志物,蛋白质组学生物标志物和循环微rna与机器学习正在积极探索。女性比例较高的HFpEF患者的生物标志物正在进化。在最近的临床试验中,尽管治疗干预在女性中比在男性中更有效,但未发现生物标志物的性别相关差异。在健康和心力衰竭的各种疾病状态中,生物标志物的表达存在性别差异。然而,就诊断研究或预后而言,这种分化并没有有效地转化为临床实践。积极探索弥合知识鸿沟和新技术可以为这一领域提供更多的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex Differences in Circulating Biomarkers of Heart Failure.

Purpose of revsiew: Evidence is scaling up for sex differences in heart failure; however, clinical relevance of sex-specific differential thresholds for biomarkers is not clearly known. Current ambiguity warrants a further look into the sex-specific studies on cardiac biomarkers and may facilitate understanding of phenotypic presentations, clinical manifestations, and pathophysiologic pathway differences in men and women.

Recent findings: Recent studies have confirmed the fact that females have differential threshold for biomarkers, with lower troponin and higher NT proBNP levels. Ambiguity continues to exist in the clinical relevance of ST-2, Galectin 3, and other biomarkers. Novel biomarkers, proteomic biomarkers, and circulating micro RNAs with machine learning are actively being explored. Biomarkers in HFpEF patients with higher female representation are evolving. In recent clinical trials, sex-related difference in biomarkers is not seen despite therapeutic intervention being more effective in females compared to males. Sex-related difference exists in the expression of biomarkers in health and in various disease states of heart failure. However, this differentiation has not effectively translated into the clinical practice in terms of diagnostic studies or prognostication. Active exploration to bridge the knowledge gap and novel technologies can shed more light in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Heart Failure Reports
Current Heart Failure Reports Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of heart failure. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as investigative, pharmacologic, and nonpharmacologic therapies, pathophysiology, and prevention. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信