在法律研究和社会科学的其他分支中,“公正的能源转型”研究方法的挑战

Thomas L Muinzer
{"title":"在法律研究和社会科学的其他分支中,“公正的能源转型”研究方法的挑战","authors":"Thomas L Muinzer","doi":"10.1093/jwelb/jwac035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ‘just energy transition’ (JET) is a concept that is starting to pervade climate and energy scholarship to a greater and greater degree at present. It is often difficult, however, to interpret clearly and precisely what this increasingly common term is intended to mean. This study explores the JET as a scholarly concept and as a compound discursive term, identifying problems that arise in research and scholarship where semantic and associated analytical precision is lacking or unclear. Such problems include the disruption of the ability to construct scholarly hypotheses and theories that allow testable propositions to be utilized with reference to the term. The study argues that these outcomes should be guarded against in legal studies, and in any branch of the social sciences that seeks to integrate JET considerations meaningfully into serious research. It is also argued that elements of the sorts of difficulties under review in relation to the JET exist in a more developed condition within the field of Energy Justice (EJ). The study draws upon the juxtaposition of JET–EJ scholarship in order to throw into relief a range of issues that JET studies should guard against.","PeriodicalId":501094,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of World Energy Law & Business","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in research approaches to the ‘just energy transition’ in legal studies and other branches of the social sciences\",\"authors\":\"Thomas L Muinzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jwelb/jwac035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ‘just energy transition’ (JET) is a concept that is starting to pervade climate and energy scholarship to a greater and greater degree at present. It is often difficult, however, to interpret clearly and precisely what this increasingly common term is intended to mean. This study explores the JET as a scholarly concept and as a compound discursive term, identifying problems that arise in research and scholarship where semantic and associated analytical precision is lacking or unclear. Such problems include the disruption of the ability to construct scholarly hypotheses and theories that allow testable propositions to be utilized with reference to the term. The study argues that these outcomes should be guarded against in legal studies, and in any branch of the social sciences that seeks to integrate JET considerations meaningfully into serious research. It is also argued that elements of the sorts of difficulties under review in relation to the JET exist in a more developed condition within the field of Energy Justice (EJ). The study draws upon the juxtaposition of JET–EJ scholarship in order to throw into relief a range of issues that JET studies should guard against.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of World Energy Law & Business\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of World Energy Law & Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwac035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of World Energy Law & Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwac035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“公平能源转型”(JET)是一个概念,目前正开始越来越多地渗透到气候和能源学术领域。然而,要清楚而准确地解释这个日益普遍的术语的含义往往是困难的。本研究将JET作为一个学术概念和复合话语术语进行探讨,确定在研究和学术中出现的语义和相关分析精度缺乏或不明确的问题。这些问题包括构建学术假设和理论的能力的破坏,这些假设和理论允许在术语中使用可测试的命题。该研究认为,在法律研究中,以及在任何寻求有意义地将JET考虑纳入严肃研究的社会科学分支中,都应该防范这些结果。还有人认为,在能源司法领域内,与JET有关的审查中的各种困难的因素在更发达的情况下存在。本研究通过对JET - ej研究的并置,揭示了JET研究应注意的一系列问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges in research approaches to the ‘just energy transition’ in legal studies and other branches of the social sciences
The ‘just energy transition’ (JET) is a concept that is starting to pervade climate and energy scholarship to a greater and greater degree at present. It is often difficult, however, to interpret clearly and precisely what this increasingly common term is intended to mean. This study explores the JET as a scholarly concept and as a compound discursive term, identifying problems that arise in research and scholarship where semantic and associated analytical precision is lacking or unclear. Such problems include the disruption of the ability to construct scholarly hypotheses and theories that allow testable propositions to be utilized with reference to the term. The study argues that these outcomes should be guarded against in legal studies, and in any branch of the social sciences that seeks to integrate JET considerations meaningfully into serious research. It is also argued that elements of the sorts of difficulties under review in relation to the JET exist in a more developed condition within the field of Energy Justice (EJ). The study draws upon the juxtaposition of JET–EJ scholarship in order to throw into relief a range of issues that JET studies should guard against.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信