采用力或肌电包络作为电机控制系统的反馈信号

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
M. Cogliati, A. Cudicio, C. Orizio
{"title":"采用力或肌电包络作为电机控制系统的反馈信号","authors":"M. Cogliati,&nbsp;A. Cudicio,&nbsp;C. Orizio","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This work studied muscle neuro-mechanics during symmetrical up-going ramp (UGR) and down-going ramp (DGR). Aim: to evaluate during the modulation of muscular action the outcome of force feedback (FF) or neural feedback (NF) on the behavior of the trailing signals - i.e. the EMG envelope (eEMG) for FF or force signal for NF.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Subjects: 20. Investigated muscles: dorsal interosseous (FDI) and tibialis anterior (TA). Detected signals: force and EMG. Visual feedback: force (FF), eEMG (NF). Effort triangles: ramps duration 7.5 s, vertex at 50 and 100 % of the maximal voluntary action. Eventually, each subject performed FF50%, FF100%, NF50% and NF100% per each muscle. In each condition the areas beneath the force and eEMG signals were computed to calculate the ratios between the DGR and UGR values during the different tasks (force area DGR / force area UGR; eEMG area DGR / eEMG area UGR). Electro-mechanical coupling efficiency (EMCE) was estimated through the eEMG area / force area ratio for both UGR and DGR in each condition.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>a) FF. FDI: eEMG area ratio was 0.84 ± 0.15 and 0.73 ± 0.17 for FF50% and FF100%, respectively. TA: eEMG area ratio was 0.88 ± 0.11 and 0.91 ± 0.17 for FF50% and FF100%, respectively. b) NF: FDI: force area ratio was 1.18 ± 0.13 and 1.17 ± 0.13 for NF50% and NF100%, respectively. TA: force area ratio was 1.17 ± 0.21 and 1.07 ± 0.19 for NF50% and NF100%, respectively. c) DGR EMCE was greater than UGR EMCE in all four tasks.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The influence of UGR on deployed EMCE in the following force decrement phase underpins the changes of trailing signals area during DGR. This underlines the necessity of a careful evaluation of the features of FF or NF for experimental studies or rehabilitation purposes involving the motor control system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102851"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123001104/pdfft?md5=d3a864c933c65fbcad5e5f2b22f33c18&pid=1-s2.0-S1050641123001104-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using force or EMG envelope as feedback signal for motor control system\",\"authors\":\"M. Cogliati,&nbsp;A. Cudicio,&nbsp;C. Orizio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This work studied muscle neuro-mechanics during symmetrical up-going ramp (UGR) and down-going ramp (DGR). Aim: to evaluate during the modulation of muscular action the outcome of force feedback (FF) or neural feedback (NF) on the behavior of the trailing signals - i.e. the EMG envelope (eEMG) for FF or force signal for NF.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Subjects: 20. Investigated muscles: dorsal interosseous (FDI) and tibialis anterior (TA). Detected signals: force and EMG. Visual feedback: force (FF), eEMG (NF). Effort triangles: ramps duration 7.5 s, vertex at 50 and 100 % of the maximal voluntary action. Eventually, each subject performed FF50%, FF100%, NF50% and NF100% per each muscle. In each condition the areas beneath the force and eEMG signals were computed to calculate the ratios between the DGR and UGR values during the different tasks (force area DGR / force area UGR; eEMG area DGR / eEMG area UGR). Electro-mechanical coupling efficiency (EMCE) was estimated through the eEMG area / force area ratio for both UGR and DGR in each condition.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>a) FF. FDI: eEMG area ratio was 0.84 ± 0.15 and 0.73 ± 0.17 for FF50% and FF100%, respectively. TA: eEMG area ratio was 0.88 ± 0.11 and 0.91 ± 0.17 for FF50% and FF100%, respectively. b) NF: FDI: force area ratio was 1.18 ± 0.13 and 1.17 ± 0.13 for NF50% and NF100%, respectively. TA: force area ratio was 1.17 ± 0.21 and 1.07 ± 0.19 for NF50% and NF100%, respectively. c) DGR EMCE was greater than UGR EMCE in all four tasks.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The influence of UGR on deployed EMCE in the following force decrement phase underpins the changes of trailing signals area during DGR. This underlines the necessity of a careful evaluation of the features of FF or NF for experimental studies or rehabilitation purposes involving the motor control system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102851\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123001104/pdfft?md5=d3a864c933c65fbcad5e5f2b22f33c18&pid=1-s2.0-S1050641123001104-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123001104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123001104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究对称上斜坡(UGR)和下斜坡(DGR)运动时的肌肉神经力学。目的:评估在肌肉动作的调节过程中,力反馈(FF)或神经反馈(NF)对跟踪信号行为的影响,即FF的肌电包络(eEMG)或NF的力信号。MethodSubjects: 20。研究肌肉:背骨间肌(FDI)和胫骨前肌(TA)。检测信号:力、肌电。视觉反馈:力(FF),眼电(NF)。努力三角形:斜坡持续时间7.5秒,顶点为最大自主动作的50%和100%。最终,每个受试者对每块肌肉进行FF50%、FF100%、NF50%和NF100%的训练。在每种情况下,计算力和eEMG信号下的区域,以计算不同任务期间DGR和UGR值之间的比值(力面积DGR /力面积UGR;眼电信号面积DGR /眼电信号面积UGR)。通过各工况下UGR和DGR的eEMG面积/力面积比估算机电耦合效率(EMCE)。FF50%和FF100%时FDI: eEMG面积比分别为0.84±0.15和0.73±0.17。FF50%和100%时TA: eEMG面积比分别为0.88±0.11和0.91±0.17。b) NF50%和NF100%时,NF: FDI:力面积比分别为1.18±0.13和1.17±0.13。TA:力面积比在NF50%和NF100%时分别为1.17±0.21和1.07±0.19。c) 4个任务中DGR EMCE均大于UGR EMCE。结论UGR在随后的力衰减阶段对EMCE的影响是DGR过程中尾随信号面积变化的基础。这强调了在涉及运动控制系统的实验研究或康复目的中仔细评估FF或NF特征的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using force or EMG envelope as feedback signal for motor control system

Purpose

This work studied muscle neuro-mechanics during symmetrical up-going ramp (UGR) and down-going ramp (DGR). Aim: to evaluate during the modulation of muscular action the outcome of force feedback (FF) or neural feedback (NF) on the behavior of the trailing signals - i.e. the EMG envelope (eEMG) for FF or force signal for NF.

Method

Subjects: 20. Investigated muscles: dorsal interosseous (FDI) and tibialis anterior (TA). Detected signals: force and EMG. Visual feedback: force (FF), eEMG (NF). Effort triangles: ramps duration 7.5 s, vertex at 50 and 100 % of the maximal voluntary action. Eventually, each subject performed FF50%, FF100%, NF50% and NF100% per each muscle. In each condition the areas beneath the force and eEMG signals were computed to calculate the ratios between the DGR and UGR values during the different tasks (force area DGR / force area UGR; eEMG area DGR / eEMG area UGR). Electro-mechanical coupling efficiency (EMCE) was estimated through the eEMG area / force area ratio for both UGR and DGR in each condition.

Results

a) FF. FDI: eEMG area ratio was 0.84 ± 0.15 and 0.73 ± 0.17 for FF50% and FF100%, respectively. TA: eEMG area ratio was 0.88 ± 0.11 and 0.91 ± 0.17 for FF50% and FF100%, respectively. b) NF: FDI: force area ratio was 1.18 ± 0.13 and 1.17 ± 0.13 for NF50% and NF100%, respectively. TA: force area ratio was 1.17 ± 0.21 and 1.07 ± 0.19 for NF50% and NF100%, respectively. c) DGR EMCE was greater than UGR EMCE in all four tasks.

Conclusion

The influence of UGR on deployed EMCE in the following force decrement phase underpins the changes of trailing signals area during DGR. This underlines the necessity of a careful evaluation of the features of FF or NF for experimental studies or rehabilitation purposes involving the motor control system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信