没有灵丹妙药:强迫性性行为障碍药物治疗的系统回顾。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Sex Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1080/00224499.2023.2282619
Nicholas C Borgogna, Tyler Owen, David Johnson, Shane W Kraus
{"title":"没有灵丹妙药:强迫性性行为障碍药物治疗的系统回顾。","authors":"Nicholas C Borgogna, Tyler Owen, David Johnson, Shane W Kraus","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2023.2282619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) is a burgeoning diagnostic construct. No systematic reviews of CSBD pharmacotherapy interventions have been conducted. We addressed this gap using a three-aim approach. We reviewed researchers' theoretical arguments for various pharmacotherapies, outcomes from pharmacotherapy trials, and the generalizability of the extant findings. Our review included <i>k</i> = 13 studies, with <i>n</i> = 141 participants. An opioid model of reward seeking was the most popular framework, though inconsistently specified. A serotonin model was also documented, though with few details. Naltrexone was the most prominently examined pharmacotherapy and the only medication that reliably demonstrated a therapeutic effect for some (but not all) indicators compared to placebo. Paroxetine and citalopram were also documented in placebo-controlled trials, though their incremental benefit compared to placebo is suspect. Several additional pharmacotherapies have been documented in case series contexts. Across studies, only one female participant was identified. All trials were conducted in developed nations, and race was rarely assessed. We conclude that the case for pharmacotherapy for CSBD is limited and should preferably not occur outside of clinical trial contexts. Naltrexone offers the best evidence for a potential research program, though new theoretically informed approaches are welcome. Finally, we call for additional pharmacotherapy research in women and non-White populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1328-1341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Magic Pill: A Systematic Review of the Pharmacological Treatments for Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas C Borgogna, Tyler Owen, David Johnson, Shane W Kraus\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00224499.2023.2282619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) is a burgeoning diagnostic construct. No systematic reviews of CSBD pharmacotherapy interventions have been conducted. We addressed this gap using a three-aim approach. We reviewed researchers' theoretical arguments for various pharmacotherapies, outcomes from pharmacotherapy trials, and the generalizability of the extant findings. Our review included <i>k</i> = 13 studies, with <i>n</i> = 141 participants. An opioid model of reward seeking was the most popular framework, though inconsistently specified. A serotonin model was also documented, though with few details. Naltrexone was the most prominently examined pharmacotherapy and the only medication that reliably demonstrated a therapeutic effect for some (but not all) indicators compared to placebo. Paroxetine and citalopram were also documented in placebo-controlled trials, though their incremental benefit compared to placebo is suspect. Several additional pharmacotherapies have been documented in case series contexts. Across studies, only one female participant was identified. All trials were conducted in developed nations, and race was rarely assessed. We conclude that the case for pharmacotherapy for CSBD is limited and should preferably not occur outside of clinical trial contexts. Naltrexone offers the best evidence for a potential research program, though new theoretically informed approaches are welcome. Finally, we call for additional pharmacotherapy research in women and non-White populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sex Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1328-1341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sex Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2282619\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2282619","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强迫性性行为障碍(CSBD)是一个新兴的诊断结构。尚未对CSBD药物治疗干预措施进行系统评价。我们使用三个目标的方法来解决这一差距。我们回顾了研究人员对各种药物治疗的理论论证,药物治疗试验的结果,以及现有发现的普遍性。我们的综述包括k = 13项研究,n = 141名参与者。阿片类药物寻求奖励的模型是最流行的框架,尽管具体说明并不一致。一个血清素模型也被记录下来,尽管细节很少。纳曲酮是最重要的药物治疗,也是唯一一种与安慰剂相比,在某些(但不是全部)指标上可靠地显示出治疗效果的药物。帕罗西汀和西酞普兰在安慰剂对照试验中也有记录,尽管与安慰剂相比,它们的增量效益值得怀疑。一些其他的药物治疗已被记录在病例系列背景下。在所有研究中,只有一名女性参与者被确定。所有的试验都是在发达国家进行的,很少对种族进行评估。我们的结论是,药物治疗CSBD的病例是有限的,最好不要发生在临床试验背景之外。纳曲酮为潜在的研究项目提供了最好的证据,尽管新的理论研究方法是受欢迎的。最后,我们呼吁在女性和非白人人群中进行更多的药物治疗研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Magic Pill: A Systematic Review of the Pharmacological Treatments for Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder.

Compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) is a burgeoning diagnostic construct. No systematic reviews of CSBD pharmacotherapy interventions have been conducted. We addressed this gap using a three-aim approach. We reviewed researchers' theoretical arguments for various pharmacotherapies, outcomes from pharmacotherapy trials, and the generalizability of the extant findings. Our review included k = 13 studies, with n = 141 participants. An opioid model of reward seeking was the most popular framework, though inconsistently specified. A serotonin model was also documented, though with few details. Naltrexone was the most prominently examined pharmacotherapy and the only medication that reliably demonstrated a therapeutic effect for some (but not all) indicators compared to placebo. Paroxetine and citalopram were also documented in placebo-controlled trials, though their incremental benefit compared to placebo is suspect. Several additional pharmacotherapies have been documented in case series contexts. Across studies, only one female participant was identified. All trials were conducted in developed nations, and race was rarely assessed. We conclude that the case for pharmacotherapy for CSBD is limited and should preferably not occur outside of clinical trial contexts. Naltrexone offers the best evidence for a potential research program, though new theoretically informed approaches are welcome. Finally, we call for additional pharmacotherapy research in women and non-White populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信