蚯蚓和鞘杆菌对未污染和cd污染土壤有机碳、氮形态及酶活性的单独和联合影响

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Li Jia , Qing Liu , Siyi Chen , Kexue Liu , Yiqing Chen , Mikael Motelica-Heino , Hesen Zhong , Menghao Zhang , Cevin Tibihenda , Patrick Lavelle , Jun Dai , Chi Zhang
{"title":"蚯蚓和鞘杆菌对未污染和cd污染土壤有机碳、氮形态及酶活性的单独和联合影响","authors":"Li Jia ,&nbsp;Qing Liu ,&nbsp;Siyi Chen ,&nbsp;Kexue Liu ,&nbsp;Yiqing Chen ,&nbsp;Mikael Motelica-Heino ,&nbsp;Hesen Zhong ,&nbsp;Menghao Zhang ,&nbsp;Cevin Tibihenda ,&nbsp;Patrick Lavelle ,&nbsp;Jun Dai ,&nbsp;Chi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2023.103576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Earthworms and <span><em>Sphingobacterium</em></span><span> sp. are known for their strong organic compound decomposition ability and wide distribution in soil. However, interactions of soil organic matter<span> decomposition with soil properties and whether microbial species such as </span></span><em>Sphingobacterium</em> sp. could assist earthworms in carbon and nitrogen transformation in soil remain poorly understood. Earthworms (<span><em>Eisenia fetida</em></span>, <em>Amynthas gracilis</em>) and <em>Sphingobacterium</em><span> sp. were introduced in non-contaminated and cadmium-contaminated soils under controlled laboratory conditions for 20 days. We examined their individual or combined effects on carbon and nitrogen forms and related enzyme activities to assess their influence on soil C and N cycling. Individual </span><em>Sphingobacterium</em><span><span> sp. inoculation led to significantly decreased organic carbon (SOC) contents, reducing it by 16.5% in non-contaminated soil and by 3.77%, in Cd-contaminated soil. It resulted in an increased </span>microbial biomass carbon (MBC) contents, reaching 1685 ± 292 mg·kg</span><sup>−1</sup> in non-contaminated soil. Individual introductions of <em>E. fetida</em> and <em>A. gracilis</em><span> caused a decline in SOC content in non-contaminated soil, but increased significantly dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen (AN) contents by 75.8%, 53.6% and 32.9%, 20.9%, respectively. In contrast, in Cd-contaminated soil, only the significant combined effects of earthworms and </span><em>Sphingobacterium</em> sp. were linked to significant increase in SOC contents, raising by 7.22% and 9.64% in <em>E. fetida + Sphingobacterium</em> sp. and <em>A. gracilis + Sphingobacterium</em> sp. treatments, respectively. In non-contaminate soil, the combined effects of earthworm and <em>Sphingobacterium</em> sp. further increased DOC and AN content by 212%, 134% and 31.3%, 25.4% in the treatments of <em>E. fetida + Sphingobacterium</em> sp. and <em>A. gracilis + Sphingobacterium</em> sp., respectively; the highest ratios of DOC to SOC and AN to total Nitrogen (TN) were found in the earthworm + <em>Sphingobacterium</em> sp. treatments as well. In non-contaminated soil, <em>Sphingobacterium</em><span> sp. and earthworms mainly influenced β-glucosidase (BG), urease (URE), N-acetyl-β-</span><span>d</span><span><span><span>-glucosaminidase (NAG) activities and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis (FDA) hydrolysis, while in Cd-contaminated soil, they mainly influenced </span>invertase (INV), NAG, URE, and protease (PRO) activities. Principal component analysis indicated that in non-contaminated soil, the earthworm activities dominated the mineralization processes of </span>soil carbon and nitrogen, and </span><em>Sphingobacterium</em> sp. can intensify this process when it was inoculated in soil along with earthworms. Furthermore, both earthworm species increased C and N levels by elevated INV and PRO activities in combined inoculation. However, in contaminated soil, the impact of earthworm inoculation on soil C stabilization showed a species dependent pattern. <em>E. fetida</em> reduced C mineralization by decreasing URE activities, while <em>A. gracilis</em> enhanced C stabilization by increasing INV activities and decreasing PRO activities. In conclusion, earthworms played a key role in enhancing C and N mineralization in non-contaminated soil and promoting C stabilization in contaminated soil. Both earthworm species followed similar strategies in the former process but adopted different strategies in the latter. When introduced individually, <em>Sphingobacterium</em><span> sp. was able to promote mineralization in both soils, primarily assisting earthworms in improving carbon and nitrogen mineralization in non-contaminated soil but hindering these processes in Cd-contaminated soil. These findings provide insights into the combined effects of earthworms and microorganisms on carbon and nitrogen cycling.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103576"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual and combined effects of earthworms and Sphingobacterium sp. on soil organic C, N forms and enzyme activities in non-contaminated and Cd-contaminated soil\",\"authors\":\"Li Jia ,&nbsp;Qing Liu ,&nbsp;Siyi Chen ,&nbsp;Kexue Liu ,&nbsp;Yiqing Chen ,&nbsp;Mikael Motelica-Heino ,&nbsp;Hesen Zhong ,&nbsp;Menghao Zhang ,&nbsp;Cevin Tibihenda ,&nbsp;Patrick Lavelle ,&nbsp;Jun Dai ,&nbsp;Chi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2023.103576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Earthworms and <span><em>Sphingobacterium</em></span><span> sp. are known for their strong organic compound decomposition ability and wide distribution in soil. However, interactions of soil organic matter<span> decomposition with soil properties and whether microbial species such as </span></span><em>Sphingobacterium</em> sp. could assist earthworms in carbon and nitrogen transformation in soil remain poorly understood. Earthworms (<span><em>Eisenia fetida</em></span>, <em>Amynthas gracilis</em>) and <em>Sphingobacterium</em><span> sp. were introduced in non-contaminated and cadmium-contaminated soils under controlled laboratory conditions for 20 days. We examined their individual or combined effects on carbon and nitrogen forms and related enzyme activities to assess their influence on soil C and N cycling. Individual </span><em>Sphingobacterium</em><span><span> sp. inoculation led to significantly decreased organic carbon (SOC) contents, reducing it by 16.5% in non-contaminated soil and by 3.77%, in Cd-contaminated soil. It resulted in an increased </span>microbial biomass carbon (MBC) contents, reaching 1685 ± 292 mg·kg</span><sup>−1</sup> in non-contaminated soil. Individual introductions of <em>E. fetida</em> and <em>A. gracilis</em><span> caused a decline in SOC content in non-contaminated soil, but increased significantly dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen (AN) contents by 75.8%, 53.6% and 32.9%, 20.9%, respectively. In contrast, in Cd-contaminated soil, only the significant combined effects of earthworms and </span><em>Sphingobacterium</em> sp. were linked to significant increase in SOC contents, raising by 7.22% and 9.64% in <em>E. fetida + Sphingobacterium</em> sp. and <em>A. gracilis + Sphingobacterium</em> sp. treatments, respectively. In non-contaminate soil, the combined effects of earthworm and <em>Sphingobacterium</em> sp. further increased DOC and AN content by 212%, 134% and 31.3%, 25.4% in the treatments of <em>E. fetida + Sphingobacterium</em> sp. and <em>A. gracilis + Sphingobacterium</em> sp., respectively; the highest ratios of DOC to SOC and AN to total Nitrogen (TN) were found in the earthworm + <em>Sphingobacterium</em> sp. treatments as well. In non-contaminated soil, <em>Sphingobacterium</em><span> sp. and earthworms mainly influenced β-glucosidase (BG), urease (URE), N-acetyl-β-</span><span>d</span><span><span><span>-glucosaminidase (NAG) activities and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis (FDA) hydrolysis, while in Cd-contaminated soil, they mainly influenced </span>invertase (INV), NAG, URE, and protease (PRO) activities. Principal component analysis indicated that in non-contaminated soil, the earthworm activities dominated the mineralization processes of </span>soil carbon and nitrogen, and </span><em>Sphingobacterium</em> sp. can intensify this process when it was inoculated in soil along with earthworms. Furthermore, both earthworm species increased C and N levels by elevated INV and PRO activities in combined inoculation. However, in contaminated soil, the impact of earthworm inoculation on soil C stabilization showed a species dependent pattern. <em>E. fetida</em> reduced C mineralization by decreasing URE activities, while <em>A. gracilis</em> enhanced C stabilization by increasing INV activities and decreasing PRO activities. In conclusion, earthworms played a key role in enhancing C and N mineralization in non-contaminated soil and promoting C stabilization in contaminated soil. Both earthworm species followed similar strategies in the former process but adopted different strategies in the latter. When introduced individually, <em>Sphingobacterium</em><span> sp. was able to promote mineralization in both soils, primarily assisting earthworms in improving carbon and nitrogen mineralization in non-contaminated soil but hindering these processes in Cd-contaminated soil. These findings provide insights into the combined effects of earthworms and microorganisms on carbon and nitrogen cycling.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Biology\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556323001127\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556323001127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蚯蚓和鞘菌具有较强的有机物分解能力,在土壤中分布广泛。然而,土壤有机质分解与土壤性质之间的相互作用,以及鞘菌等微生物物种是否能帮助蚯蚓在土壤中进行碳氮转化,目前尚不清楚。在实验室控制条件下,将蚯蚓(Eisenia fetida, Amynthas gracilis)和鞘菌(Sphingobacterium)分别引入未污染和镉污染的土壤中20 d。我们研究了它们对碳和氮形态以及相关酶活性的单独或联合影响,以评估它们对土壤碳和氮循环的影响。接种单株鞘杆菌可显著降低土壤有机碳(SOC)含量,在未污染土壤中降低16.5%,在cd污染土壤中降低3.77%。土壤微生物生物量碳(MBC)含量增加,达到1685±292 mg·kg−1。单独引种羊草和草茅导致未污染土壤有机碳含量下降,但溶解有机碳(DOC)和碱解氮(AN)含量显著提高,分别提高75.8%、53.6%和32.9%、20.9%。在cd污染的土壤中,只有蚯蚓和鞘杆菌的显著联合作用显著提高了土壤有机碳含量,臭虫E. +鞘杆菌和草芽草A. +鞘杆菌分别提高了7.22%和9.64%。在无公害土壤中,蚯蚓和鞘杆菌的联合作用进一步提高了土壤中DOC和AN的含量,分别比fetida +鞘杆菌和A. gracilis +鞘杆菌处理分别提高了212%、134%和31.3%、25.4%;土壤中DOC / SOC和AN / TN均以蚯蚓+鞘菌处理最高。在未污染土壤中,Sphingobacterium sp.和蚯蚓主要影响β-葡萄糖苷酶(BG)、脲酶(URE)、n-乙酰基-β-d-葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)活性和荧光素二乙酸酯水解(FDA)活性,而在cd污染土壤中,它们主要影响转化酶(INV)、NAG、URE和蛋白酶(PRO)活性。主成分分析表明,在未受污染的土壤中,蚯蚓活动主导了土壤碳氮的矿化过程,且与蚯蚓一起接种时,鞘菌可强化这一过程。此外,两种蚯蚓通过联合接种提高了INV和PRO活性,提高了C和N水平。而在污染土壤中,蚯蚓接种对土壤C稳定的影响表现为物种依赖模式。肥田草通过降低URE活性降低碳矿化,而股草通过提高INV活性和降低PRO活性增强碳稳定。综上所述,蚯蚓在促进未污染土壤C、N矿化和促进污染土壤C稳定方面发挥了关键作用。两种蚯蚓在前一种过程中采用相似的策略,而在后一种过程中采用不同的策略。当单独引入时,Sphingobacterium sp.能够促进两种土壤中的矿化,主要帮助蚯蚓改善未污染土壤中的碳和氮矿化,而阻碍cd污染土壤中的这些过程。这些发现为蚯蚓和微生物对碳和氮循环的综合影响提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual and combined effects of earthworms and Sphingobacterium sp. on soil organic C, N forms and enzyme activities in non-contaminated and Cd-contaminated soil

Earthworms and Sphingobacterium sp. are known for their strong organic compound decomposition ability and wide distribution in soil. However, interactions of soil organic matter decomposition with soil properties and whether microbial species such as Sphingobacterium sp. could assist earthworms in carbon and nitrogen transformation in soil remain poorly understood. Earthworms (Eisenia fetida, Amynthas gracilis) and Sphingobacterium sp. were introduced in non-contaminated and cadmium-contaminated soils under controlled laboratory conditions for 20 days. We examined their individual or combined effects on carbon and nitrogen forms and related enzyme activities to assess their influence on soil C and N cycling. Individual Sphingobacterium sp. inoculation led to significantly decreased organic carbon (SOC) contents, reducing it by 16.5% in non-contaminated soil and by 3.77%, in Cd-contaminated soil. It resulted in an increased microbial biomass carbon (MBC) contents, reaching 1685 ± 292 mg·kg−1 in non-contaminated soil. Individual introductions of E. fetida and A. gracilis caused a decline in SOC content in non-contaminated soil, but increased significantly dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen (AN) contents by 75.8%, 53.6% and 32.9%, 20.9%, respectively. In contrast, in Cd-contaminated soil, only the significant combined effects of earthworms and Sphingobacterium sp. were linked to significant increase in SOC contents, raising by 7.22% and 9.64% in E. fetida + Sphingobacterium sp. and A. gracilis + Sphingobacterium sp. treatments, respectively. In non-contaminate soil, the combined effects of earthworm and Sphingobacterium sp. further increased DOC and AN content by 212%, 134% and 31.3%, 25.4% in the treatments of E. fetida + Sphingobacterium sp. and A. gracilis + Sphingobacterium sp., respectively; the highest ratios of DOC to SOC and AN to total Nitrogen (TN) were found in the earthworm + Sphingobacterium sp. treatments as well. In non-contaminated soil, Sphingobacterium sp. and earthworms mainly influenced β-glucosidase (BG), urease (URE), N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (NAG) activities and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis (FDA) hydrolysis, while in Cd-contaminated soil, they mainly influenced invertase (INV), NAG, URE, and protease (PRO) activities. Principal component analysis indicated that in non-contaminated soil, the earthworm activities dominated the mineralization processes of soil carbon and nitrogen, and Sphingobacterium sp. can intensify this process when it was inoculated in soil along with earthworms. Furthermore, both earthworm species increased C and N levels by elevated INV and PRO activities in combined inoculation. However, in contaminated soil, the impact of earthworm inoculation on soil C stabilization showed a species dependent pattern. E. fetida reduced C mineralization by decreasing URE activities, while A. gracilis enhanced C stabilization by increasing INV activities and decreasing PRO activities. In conclusion, earthworms played a key role in enhancing C and N mineralization in non-contaminated soil and promoting C stabilization in contaminated soil. Both earthworm species followed similar strategies in the former process but adopted different strategies in the latter. When introduced individually, Sphingobacterium sp. was able to promote mineralization in both soils, primarily assisting earthworms in improving carbon and nitrogen mineralization in non-contaminated soil but hindering these processes in Cd-contaminated soil. These findings provide insights into the combined effects of earthworms and microorganisms on carbon and nitrogen cycling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信