{"title":"测定总混合比例中正阴离子差浓度和均匀性的巨量矿物计的评价","authors":"S.R. Poldervaart, M. Wukadinovich, H.A. Rossow","doi":"10.15232/aas.2023-02415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Our objectives were to evaluate prediction of macromineral concentrations in a TMR by various meters compared with laboratory macromineral analyses, to determine whether these meters could estimate DCAD in the TMR for close-up and lactating-cow pens, and to determine whether meters could estimate uniformity of TMR.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Meters used were Cl (Oakton SaltTestr, Oakton Instruments, Vernon Hills, IL), K (Laqua Twin K Meter, Horiba Scientific, Kyoto, Japan), S (Hanna Instruments Smithfield, RI), and Ca and Mg (Hanna Instruments Ca/Mg Photometer, Smithfield, RI). The TMR samples were collected from close-up and lactating-cow pens in 10 dairies. Ten subsamples of TMR were collected per pen at the time of feeding and sent to Analab (Agri-King Inc., Fulton, IL) for analysis, and another 10 were used to measure mineral concentrations with the meters. Mineral concentrations analyzed by the laboratory were regressed on meter mineral concentrations.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Prediction of Cl and K concentrations in TMR were best (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.53 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.66, respectively). The combination of K and Cl meter concentrations was able to predict TMR DCAD (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72). The Cl meter was also able to predict TMR coefficient of variation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.57) to evaluate TMR uniformity.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Chloride and K meters can aid in identifying the source of TMR DCAD failure and can predict overall TMR uniformity delivered by the mixer wagon.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8519,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000769/pdf?md5=7433a27fac233d5c6610fdf47062ace9&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286523000769-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of macromineral meters to detect cation- anion difference concentration and uniformity in a total mixed ration\",\"authors\":\"S.R. Poldervaart, M. Wukadinovich, H.A. Rossow\",\"doi\":\"10.15232/aas.2023-02415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Our objectives were to evaluate prediction of macromineral concentrations in a TMR by various meters compared with laboratory macromineral analyses, to determine whether these meters could estimate DCAD in the TMR for close-up and lactating-cow pens, and to determine whether meters could estimate uniformity of TMR.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Meters used were Cl (Oakton SaltTestr, Oakton Instruments, Vernon Hills, IL), K (Laqua Twin K Meter, Horiba Scientific, Kyoto, Japan), S (Hanna Instruments Smithfield, RI), and Ca and Mg (Hanna Instruments Ca/Mg Photometer, Smithfield, RI). The TMR samples were collected from close-up and lactating-cow pens in 10 dairies. Ten subsamples of TMR were collected per pen at the time of feeding and sent to Analab (Agri-King Inc., Fulton, IL) for analysis, and another 10 were used to measure mineral concentrations with the meters. Mineral concentrations analyzed by the laboratory were regressed on meter mineral concentrations.</p></div><div><h3>Results and Discussion</h3><p>Prediction of Cl and K concentrations in TMR were best (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.53 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.66, respectively). The combination of K and Cl meter concentrations was able to predict TMR DCAD (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72). The Cl meter was also able to predict TMR coefficient of variation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.57) to evaluate TMR uniformity.</p></div><div><h3>Implications and Applications</h3><p>Chloride and K meters can aid in identifying the source of TMR DCAD failure and can predict overall TMR uniformity delivered by the mixer wagon.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000769/pdf?md5=7433a27fac233d5c6610fdf47062ace9&pid=1-s2.0-S2590286523000769-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286523000769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们的目的是评价各种仪器对TMR中巨量矿物质浓度的预测,并将其与实验室巨量矿物质分析进行比较,以确定这些仪器是否可以估计近距离和哺乳期奶牛围栏中TMR中的DCAD,并确定仪器是否可以估计TMR的均匀性。材料和方法使用的仪表为Cl (Oakton盐测试仪,Oakton Instruments, Vernon Hills, IL), K (Laqua Twin K Meter,堀场科学,京都,日本),S (Hanna Instruments Smithfield, RI)和Ca和Mg (Hanna Instruments Ca/Mg光度计,Smithfield, RI)。TMR样本采集于10个奶牛场的近距离奶牛栏和泌乳奶牛栏。在饲养时,每个畜栏收集10个TMR亚样本,并送到Analab (Agri-King Inc., Fulton, IL)进行分析,另外10个亚样本用于用仪器测量矿物质浓度。实验室分析的矿物浓度回归到仪表矿物浓度。结果与讨论TMR中Cl和K浓度的预测效果最好(R2 = 0.53, R2 = 0.66)。K和Cl浓度联合预测TMR DCAD (R2 = 0.72)。Cl计还能预测TMR变异系数(R2 = 0.57),评价TMR均匀性。含义和应用氯化物和K仪表可以帮助确定TMR DCAD故障的来源,并可以预测混合车提供的整体TMR均匀性。
Evaluation of macromineral meters to detect cation- anion difference concentration and uniformity in a total mixed ration
Objectives
Our objectives were to evaluate prediction of macromineral concentrations in a TMR by various meters compared with laboratory macromineral analyses, to determine whether these meters could estimate DCAD in the TMR for close-up and lactating-cow pens, and to determine whether meters could estimate uniformity of TMR.
Materials and Methods
Meters used were Cl (Oakton SaltTestr, Oakton Instruments, Vernon Hills, IL), K (Laqua Twin K Meter, Horiba Scientific, Kyoto, Japan), S (Hanna Instruments Smithfield, RI), and Ca and Mg (Hanna Instruments Ca/Mg Photometer, Smithfield, RI). The TMR samples were collected from close-up and lactating-cow pens in 10 dairies. Ten subsamples of TMR were collected per pen at the time of feeding and sent to Analab (Agri-King Inc., Fulton, IL) for analysis, and another 10 were used to measure mineral concentrations with the meters. Mineral concentrations analyzed by the laboratory were regressed on meter mineral concentrations.
Results and Discussion
Prediction of Cl and K concentrations in TMR were best (R2 = 0.53 and R2 = 0.66, respectively). The combination of K and Cl meter concentrations was able to predict TMR DCAD (R2 = 0.72). The Cl meter was also able to predict TMR coefficient of variation (R2 = 0.57) to evaluate TMR uniformity.
Implications and Applications
Chloride and K meters can aid in identifying the source of TMR DCAD failure and can predict overall TMR uniformity delivered by the mixer wagon.