Performance evaluation of PLT-H (hybrid-channel platelet) under various interferences and application studies for platelet transfusion decisions.

The hybrid-channel platelet counting method (PLT-H) is a new platelet counting technique proposed by Mindray of China. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of this technique in various situations and its reliability in platelet transfusion decision-making. A total of 378 venous blood samples were tested. Using the immunological PLT counting method recommended by the International Council for Standardization in Hematology as the reference method (PLT-IRM), Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis were performed on the PLT-H results. The anti-interference performance of PLT-H under different interference levels was explored using intergroup comparisons, and confusion matrices were analyzed at various transfusion cutoff values. In the absence of interference, there was a strong correlation between PLT-H and PLT-IRM (r = 0.993, 95% CI: 0.990-0.996). Under various interference conditions, the correlation between PLT-H and PLT-IRM was between 0.963 and 0.992, with an average deviation of -14.56 to -2.02. The performance of PLT-H against interference did not change significantly with increasing levels of small RBCs, large PLTs, and RBC fragments (P = .5704, 0.0832, 0.9893). In low-value samples (PLT <100 × 10⁹/L), the coefficient of variation (CV) for PLT-H was less than 7.6%, regardless of the presence or absence of interfering substances. In addition, there was a high agreement between PLT-H and PLT-IRM (ICC = 0.972). Confusion matrice analysis at each medical decision level showed similarity to methods using the fluorescence channel (PLT-O) and superiority to the impedance channel (PLT-I). Compared with PLT-I, PLT-H has higher accuracy in PLT counting, stronger anti-interference ability, better performance in low-value samples at no extra economic cost and can be more useful for platelet transfusion decision-making. PLT-H is a novel method for platelet counting that offers higher accuracy, providing physicians with the ability to make better medical decisions, particularly in cases where values are low, or interference is present. As it does not require additional reagents, it is highly likely to replace PLT-I and become the mainstream method for platelet counting in the future.