使用迭代重建技术的低剂量儿童CT头部方案:与标准剂量方案的比较。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s00062-023-01361-4
Priyanka, Rajagopal Kadavigere, Suresh Sukumar
{"title":"使用迭代重建技术的低剂量儿童CT头部方案:与标准剂量方案的比较。","authors":"Priyanka, Rajagopal Kadavigere, Suresh Sukumar","doi":"10.1007/s00062-023-01361-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pediatric computed tomography (CT) head examination has also increased in recent years with the advancement in CT technology; however, children exposed to radiation at the youngest age are more vulnerable to the risks of radiation. The aim of the study is to evaluate radiation dose and image quality of low dose pediatric CT head protocol compared to standard dose pediatric CT head protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study. Group 1 included 73 patients aged < 1 year and 70 patients in the 1-5 years age group and had undergone CT head examination using the standard dose protocol. Group 2 included 31 patients aged < 1 year and 40 patients in the 1-5 years age group and had undergone CT head examination using the low dose protocol. The radiation dose was measured and image quality was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in radiation dose between the standard and low dose protocols (p > 0.05) with lower radiation dose for low dose group. The qualitative analysis did not show a significant difference between the standard and low dose protocols. The gray-white matter differentiation (GWMD), attenuation, contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and figure of merit (FOM) were higher in the low dose protocol compared to the standard dose with a significant difference (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that a low dose protocol at 80 kV tube voltage/150 mAs tube current exposure time product/iterative reconstruction-iDose<sup>4</sup> (level 3) for < 1 year age group and 100 kV/200m As/iDose<sup>4</sup> (level 3) for 1-5 years age group provides ultra-low effective dose with diagnostically acceptable image quality for pediatric CT head examination compared with standard dose protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"229-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low Dose Pediatric CT Head Protocol using Iterative Reconstruction Techniques: A Comparison with Standard Dose Protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Priyanka, Rajagopal Kadavigere, Suresh Sukumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00062-023-01361-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pediatric computed tomography (CT) head examination has also increased in recent years with the advancement in CT technology; however, children exposed to radiation at the youngest age are more vulnerable to the risks of radiation. The aim of the study is to evaluate radiation dose and image quality of low dose pediatric CT head protocol compared to standard dose pediatric CT head protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study. Group 1 included 73 patients aged < 1 year and 70 patients in the 1-5 years age group and had undergone CT head examination using the standard dose protocol. Group 2 included 31 patients aged < 1 year and 40 patients in the 1-5 years age group and had undergone CT head examination using the low dose protocol. The radiation dose was measured and image quality was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in radiation dose between the standard and low dose protocols (p > 0.05) with lower radiation dose for low dose group. The qualitative analysis did not show a significant difference between the standard and low dose protocols. The gray-white matter differentiation (GWMD), attenuation, contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and figure of merit (FOM) were higher in the low dose protocol compared to the standard dose with a significant difference (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that a low dose protocol at 80 kV tube voltage/150 mAs tube current exposure time product/iterative reconstruction-iDose<sup>4</sup> (level 3) for < 1 year age group and 100 kV/200m As/iDose<sup>4</sup> (level 3) for 1-5 years age group provides ultra-low effective dose with diagnostically acceptable image quality for pediatric CT head examination compared with standard dose protocol.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"229-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01361-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01361-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近年来,随着CT技术的进步,儿童CT头部检查也有所增加;然而,在最小的年龄受到辐射的儿童更容易受到辐射的危害。本研究的目的是评估低剂量儿童CT头方案与标准剂量儿童CT头方案的辐射剂量和图像质量。方法:前瞻性研究。结果:标准方案与低剂量方案放射剂量差异有统计学意义(p > 0.05),低剂量组放射剂量较低。定性分析没有显示标准和低剂量方案之间的显著差异。低剂量组脑灰质分化(GWMD)、衰减、噪声比(CNR)和优值图(FOM)均高于标准剂量组,差异有统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:与标准剂量方案相比,低剂量方案80 kV管电压/150 mAs管电流暴露时间积/迭代重建- idose4(3级)4(3级)为1-5岁儿童CT头部检查提供了超低有效剂量和诊断可接受的图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Low Dose Pediatric CT Head Protocol using Iterative Reconstruction Techniques: A Comparison with Standard Dose Protocol.

Low Dose Pediatric CT Head Protocol using Iterative Reconstruction Techniques: A Comparison with Standard Dose Protocol.

Purpose: Pediatric computed tomography (CT) head examination has also increased in recent years with the advancement in CT technology; however, children exposed to radiation at the youngest age are more vulnerable to the risks of radiation. The aim of the study is to evaluate radiation dose and image quality of low dose pediatric CT head protocol compared to standard dose pediatric CT head protocol.

Methods: This was a prospective study. Group 1 included 73 patients aged < 1 year and 70 patients in the 1-5 years age group and had undergone CT head examination using the standard dose protocol. Group 2 included 31 patients aged < 1 year and 40 patients in the 1-5 years age group and had undergone CT head examination using the low dose protocol. The radiation dose was measured and image quality was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively.

Results: There was a significant difference in radiation dose between the standard and low dose protocols (p > 0.05) with lower radiation dose for low dose group. The qualitative analysis did not show a significant difference between the standard and low dose protocols. The gray-white matter differentiation (GWMD), attenuation, contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and figure of merit (FOM) were higher in the low dose protocol compared to the standard dose with a significant difference (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The study concludes that a low dose protocol at 80 kV tube voltage/150 mAs tube current exposure time product/iterative reconstruction-iDose4 (level 3) for < 1 year age group and 100 kV/200m As/iDose4 (level 3) for 1-5 years age group provides ultra-low effective dose with diagnostically acceptable image quality for pediatric CT head examination compared with standard dose protocol.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信