[健康福祉研究所初级卫生保健课程满意度调查的混合分析]。

Carlos Alberto Juárez-Medel, Rosbel Toledo-Ortiz, Jessica Margarita González-Rojas, Yesenia Romero-Casillas, Malú Aidee Reyna-Álvarez, Sergio Aarón de la Rosa-Cruz, Luz Alejandra Cano-Collado, César Raúl González-Bonilla
{"title":"[健康福祉研究所初级卫生保健课程满意度调查的混合分析]。","authors":"Carlos Alberto Juárez-Medel, Rosbel Toledo-Ortiz, Jessica Margarita González-Rojas, Yesenia Romero-Casillas, Malú Aidee Reyna-Álvarez, Sergio Aarón de la Rosa-Cruz, Luz Alejandra Cano-Collado, César Raúl González-Bonilla","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10064301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Describing the perception towards the online course on Primary Health Care (PHC) of the Institute of Health for Well-being (INSABI) will allow to establish improvement actions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the factors that contribute to satisfaction with the PHC course offered online by INSABI.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>620 records of the Health Education System for Well-being were studied. Satisfaction was determined using a Likert-type questionnaire with three dimensions: virtual environment, cognitive area, and measurement of learning. A deductive analysis of the open opinions was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>70% of the health personnel approved the course in less than a week, with an initial score of 5.41 ±1.9 points and final score of 7.8 ± 1.2. More than 65% had scores above the average in the three dimensions. Satisfaction with the virtual environment was 15.57 ± 3.4 points, and 15.73 ± 3.3 with the cognitive dimension. Age and gender were associated with dissatisfaction with the virtual environment and in the cognitive dimension, age was associated with dissatisfaction; 27.7% expressed negative comments, 28.5% related to course extension; 15.5% about the didactic techniques, 10.9% about the speakers and 10.4% about the final exam.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The course generates significant learning, 62.4% of the students have a positive or neutral opinion. However, 27.8% expressed dissatisfaction, the majority related to the extension of the course.</p>","PeriodicalId":94200,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Mixed analysis of the satisfaction survey of the Primary Health Care course of the Institute of Health for Well-being].\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Alberto Juárez-Medel, Rosbel Toledo-Ortiz, Jessica Margarita González-Rojas, Yesenia Romero-Casillas, Malú Aidee Reyna-Álvarez, Sergio Aarón de la Rosa-Cruz, Luz Alejandra Cano-Collado, César Raúl González-Bonilla\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/zenodo.10064301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Describing the perception towards the online course on Primary Health Care (PHC) of the Institute of Health for Well-being (INSABI) will allow to establish improvement actions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the factors that contribute to satisfaction with the PHC course offered online by INSABI.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>620 records of the Health Education System for Well-being were studied. Satisfaction was determined using a Likert-type questionnaire with three dimensions: virtual environment, cognitive area, and measurement of learning. A deductive analysis of the open opinions was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>70% of the health personnel approved the course in less than a week, with an initial score of 5.41 ±1.9 points and final score of 7.8 ± 1.2. More than 65% had scores above the average in the three dimensions. Satisfaction with the virtual environment was 15.57 ± 3.4 points, and 15.73 ± 3.3 with the cognitive dimension. Age and gender were associated with dissatisfaction with the virtual environment and in the cognitive dimension, age was associated with dissatisfaction; 27.7% expressed negative comments, 28.5% related to course extension; 15.5% about the didactic techniques, 10.9% about the speakers and 10.4% about the final exam.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The course generates significant learning, 62.4% of the students have a positive or neutral opinion. However, 27.8% expressed dissatisfaction, the majority related to the extension of the course.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712933/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10064301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10064301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:描述对健康促进福祉研究所(INSABI)初级卫生保健(PHC)在线课程的看法,将有助于制定改进行动。目的:描述影响学生对INSABI在线PHC课程满意度的因素。材料与方法:对620份健康教育系统的记录进行研究。满意度的确定使用李克特型问卷有三个维度:虚拟环境,认知领域和学习测量。对公开意见进行了演绎分析。结果:70%的卫生人员在不到一周的时间内认可课程,初始得分为5.41±1.9分,最终得分为7.8±1.2分。超过65%的人在三个维度上的得分高于平均水平。虚拟环境满意度为15.57±3.4分,认知维度为15.73±3.3分。年龄和性别与虚拟环境不满意程度相关,在认知维度上,年龄与不满意程度相关;27.7%的人表达了负面评价,28.5%与课程扩展有关;15.5%关于教学技巧,10.9%关于演讲者,10.4%关于期末考试。结论:该课程产生了显著的学习效果,62.4%的学生对该课程持积极或中立的看法。然而,27.8%的人表达了不满,其中大多数与课程延长有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Mixed analysis of the satisfaction survey of the Primary Health Care course of the Institute of Health for Well-being].

Background: Describing the perception towards the online course on Primary Health Care (PHC) of the Institute of Health for Well-being (INSABI) will allow to establish improvement actions.

Objective: Describe the factors that contribute to satisfaction with the PHC course offered online by INSABI.

Material and methods: 620 records of the Health Education System for Well-being were studied. Satisfaction was determined using a Likert-type questionnaire with three dimensions: virtual environment, cognitive area, and measurement of learning. A deductive analysis of the open opinions was carried out.

Results: 70% of the health personnel approved the course in less than a week, with an initial score of 5.41 ±1.9 points and final score of 7.8 ± 1.2. More than 65% had scores above the average in the three dimensions. Satisfaction with the virtual environment was 15.57 ± 3.4 points, and 15.73 ± 3.3 with the cognitive dimension. Age and gender were associated with dissatisfaction with the virtual environment and in the cognitive dimension, age was associated with dissatisfaction; 27.7% expressed negative comments, 28.5% related to course extension; 15.5% about the didactic techniques, 10.9% about the speakers and 10.4% about the final exam.

Conclusions: The course generates significant learning, 62.4% of the students have a positive or neutral opinion. However, 27.8% expressed dissatisfaction, the majority related to the extension of the course.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信