成年男性一次性包皮环切缝合器的系带保护技术。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Xiaojun Lu, Shuguang Piao, ShenFei Qin, KaiXuan Zhang, JiaCheng Li, WenHao Zhou, Lei Tang, Shi Yan, Yuangui Chen, Guonan Yin, Tie Zhou
{"title":"成年男性一次性包皮环切缝合器的系带保护技术。","authors":"Xiaojun Lu, Shuguang Piao, ShenFei Qin, KaiXuan Zhang, JiaCheng Li, WenHao Zhou, Lei Tang, Shi Yan, Yuangui Chen, Guonan Yin, Tie Zhou","doi":"10.22037/uj.v20i.7788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of frenulum protection technique of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) in adult males.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Atotal of 53 adult males were diagnosed with redundant prepuce and underwent circumcision with DCSD using frenulum protection technique. The main preoperative and postoperative measure of the length of penile frenulum was evaluated. Other data such as edema rate, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative pain, staple falling off time, incision infection rate, and evaluation of satisfaction rate with penis appearance were documented in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative frenulum length for each patient. The mean length of the penile frenulum before and after surgery was 2.25 ± 0.36 cm and 2.23 ± 0.39 cm, respectively (p = .31). The rate of frenulum length preservation was 100%. All the patients had no excessive resection of the frenulum and no serious complication happened after surgery. The satisfaction rate of postoperative penis appearance from patients' evaluation was 98.1% (52/53).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The frenulum protection technique was simple and operable, which could help the operator to accurately identify the most distal position of the frenulum and retain a sufficient length of frenulum during DCSD circumcision.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"424-428"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frenulum Protection Technique in Disposable Circumcision Suture Device for Adult Males.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaojun Lu, Shuguang Piao, ShenFei Qin, KaiXuan Zhang, JiaCheng Li, WenHao Zhou, Lei Tang, Shi Yan, Yuangui Chen, Guonan Yin, Tie Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/uj.v20i.7788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of frenulum protection technique of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) in adult males.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Atotal of 53 adult males were diagnosed with redundant prepuce and underwent circumcision with DCSD using frenulum protection technique. The main preoperative and postoperative measure of the length of penile frenulum was evaluated. Other data such as edema rate, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative pain, staple falling off time, incision infection rate, and evaluation of satisfaction rate with penis appearance were documented in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative frenulum length for each patient. The mean length of the penile frenulum before and after surgery was 2.25 ± 0.36 cm and 2.23 ± 0.39 cm, respectively (p = .31). The rate of frenulum length preservation was 100%. All the patients had no excessive resection of the frenulum and no serious complication happened after surgery. The satisfaction rate of postoperative penis appearance from patients' evaluation was 98.1% (52/53).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The frenulum protection technique was simple and operable, which could help the operator to accurately identify the most distal position of the frenulum and retain a sufficient length of frenulum during DCSD circumcision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"424-428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7788\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7788","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价一次性包皮环切器(DCSD)护系带技术在成年男性包皮环切术中的应用效果。材料与方法:确诊包皮过多的成年男性53例,采用环带保护技术行包皮环切术。评价术前、术后阴茎系带长度的主要测量指标。其他数据如水肿率、术中出血量、手术时间、术后疼痛、取钉时间、切口感染率、阴茎外观满意度评价。结果:两组患者术前、术后系带长度无明显差异。手术前后阴茎系带平均长度分别为2.25±0.36 cm和2.23±0.39 cm (P = 0.31)。系带长度保存率为100%。所有患者均未发生系带过度切除,术后无严重并发症发生。患者术后阴茎外观评价满意率为98.1%(52/53)。结论:系带保护技术简单易行,可帮助术者在DCSD包皮环切术中准确识别系带最远端位置,保留足够长度的系带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frenulum Protection Technique in Disposable Circumcision Suture Device for Adult Males.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of frenulum protection technique of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) in adult males.

Materials and methods: Atotal of 53 adult males were diagnosed with redundant prepuce and underwent circumcision with DCSD using frenulum protection technique. The main preoperative and postoperative measure of the length of penile frenulum was evaluated. Other data such as edema rate, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative pain, staple falling off time, incision infection rate, and evaluation of satisfaction rate with penis appearance were documented in the study.

Results: There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative frenulum length for each patient. The mean length of the penile frenulum before and after surgery was 2.25 ± 0.36 cm and 2.23 ± 0.39 cm, respectively (p = .31). The rate of frenulum length preservation was 100%. All the patients had no excessive resection of the frenulum and no serious complication happened after surgery. The satisfaction rate of postoperative penis appearance from patients' evaluation was 98.1% (52/53).

Conclusion: The frenulum protection technique was simple and operable, which could help the operator to accurately identify the most distal position of the frenulum and retain a sufficient length of frenulum during DCSD circumcision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信