{"title":"调查中的不满:加上<s:1>变化,加上c 'est la même选择了?","authors":"Bruce N. Cuthbert","doi":"10.1016/j.appsy.2007.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Paul Wachtel's classic paper on “Investigation and its discontents” sounds a contemporary tone even though it was published over 25 years ago. This commentary discusses two aspects of the original manuscript – productivity and grant funding – and their implications for psychological science in the context of funding agencies’ current strong emphasis on neuroscience and interdisciplinary research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84177,"journal":{"name":"Applied & preventive psychology : journal of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 15-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.appsy.2007.07.005","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discontent in investigation: Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose?\",\"authors\":\"Bruce N. Cuthbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appsy.2007.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Paul Wachtel's classic paper on “Investigation and its discontents” sounds a contemporary tone even though it was published over 25 years ago. This commentary discusses two aspects of the original manuscript – productivity and grant funding – and their implications for psychological science in the context of funding agencies’ current strong emphasis on neuroscience and interdisciplinary research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied & preventive psychology : journal of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 15-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.appsy.2007.07.005\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied & preventive psychology : journal of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962184907000066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied & preventive psychology : journal of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962184907000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
保罗·瓦赫特尔(Paul Wachtel)的经典论文《调查及其不满》(Investigation and its discontents)虽然发表于25年前,但听起来仍带有当代风格。这篇评论讨论了原稿的两个方面——生产力和资助资金——以及它们在资助机构目前强烈强调神经科学和跨学科研究的背景下对心理科学的影响。
Discontent in investigation: Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose?
Paul Wachtel's classic paper on “Investigation and its discontents” sounds a contemporary tone even though it was published over 25 years ago. This commentary discusses two aspects of the original manuscript – productivity and grant funding – and their implications for psychological science in the context of funding agencies’ current strong emphasis on neuroscience and interdisciplinary research.