胎儿和新生儿形态发育标准作为确定胎龄的方法。

K Cieślik
{"title":"胎儿和新生儿形态发育标准作为确定胎龄的方法。","authors":"K Cieślik","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whenever the calendar age of the studied fetal material is not known we are bound to reconstruct it by replacing it with the developmental age. In this paper some common developmental standards used in the determination of fetal age are reviewed. The standards, as found in the relevant literature, are tested against a control group for their accuracy in predicting fetal age. The results indicate considerable discrepancy among the various standards. Further, the developmental ages defined by these standards often differ considerably from the known menstrual age. My own attempt to present a more reliable set of developmental standards is based on the analysis of three morphological features commonly used in biological assessment. Body weight, crown-heel length, and crown-rump length are measured in weekly termed groups representing the 20th-42nd weeks of intrauterine life. The accuracy of body weight and crown-heel length in predicting fetal age is tested both within and against a control group. Statistical analysis show no significant differences between the predicted and known fetal ages. These results indicate that body weight and crown-heel length are reliable developmental standards from which fetal age can be defined.</p>","PeriodicalId":76854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie","volume":"78 1","pages":"133-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards of morphological development in fetuses and newborns as a method of defining fetal age.\",\"authors\":\"K Cieślik\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Whenever the calendar age of the studied fetal material is not known we are bound to reconstruct it by replacing it with the developmental age. In this paper some common developmental standards used in the determination of fetal age are reviewed. The standards, as found in the relevant literature, are tested against a control group for their accuracy in predicting fetal age. The results indicate considerable discrepancy among the various standards. Further, the developmental ages defined by these standards often differ considerably from the known menstrual age. My own attempt to present a more reliable set of developmental standards is based on the analysis of three morphological features commonly used in biological assessment. Body weight, crown-heel length, and crown-rump length are measured in weekly termed groups representing the 20th-42nd weeks of intrauterine life. The accuracy of body weight and crown-heel length in predicting fetal age is tested both within and against a control group. Statistical analysis show no significant differences between the predicted and known fetal ages. These results indicate that body weight and crown-heel length are reliable developmental standards from which fetal age can be defined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"133-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每当所研究的胎儿材料的日历年龄未知时,我们必须通过用发育年龄代替它来重建它。本文综述了几种常用的胎儿年龄测定标准。这些标准,如在相关文献中发现的,在预测胎儿年龄的准确性方面与对照组进行了测试。结果表明,各种标准之间存在相当大的差异。此外,这些标准所定义的发育年龄往往与已知的月经年龄相差很大。我自己试图提出一套更可靠的发育标准,是基于对生物学评估中常用的三种形态特征的分析。体重、冠跟长度和冠臀长度以周为单位测量,代表子宫内生命的第20 -42周。体重和冠跟长度预测胎龄的准确性在对照组内和对照中进行了测试。统计分析显示,预测胎龄与已知胎龄之间无显著差异。这些结果表明,体重和冠跟长度是确定胎龄的可靠发育标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standards of morphological development in fetuses and newborns as a method of defining fetal age.

Whenever the calendar age of the studied fetal material is not known we are bound to reconstruct it by replacing it with the developmental age. In this paper some common developmental standards used in the determination of fetal age are reviewed. The standards, as found in the relevant literature, are tested against a control group for their accuracy in predicting fetal age. The results indicate considerable discrepancy among the various standards. Further, the developmental ages defined by these standards often differ considerably from the known menstrual age. My own attempt to present a more reliable set of developmental standards is based on the analysis of three morphological features commonly used in biological assessment. Body weight, crown-heel length, and crown-rump length are measured in weekly termed groups representing the 20th-42nd weeks of intrauterine life. The accuracy of body weight and crown-heel length in predicting fetal age is tested both within and against a control group. Statistical analysis show no significant differences between the predicted and known fetal ages. These results indicate that body weight and crown-heel length are reliable developmental standards from which fetal age can be defined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信