以索拉非尼作为化疗栓塞的桥接疗法并最终作为姑息疗法的肝癌患者病例系列。

IF 0.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Nora Hilda Chávez Hernández , Alejandro Antonio Sánchez Cruz
{"title":"以索拉非尼作为化疗栓塞的桥接疗法并最终作为姑息疗法的肝癌患者病例系列。","authors":"Nora Hilda Chávez Hernández ,&nbsp;Alejandro Antonio Sánchez Cruz","doi":"10.1016/j.gamo.2016.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are candidates for chemoembolisation that face long delays due to waiting for the imaging assessment of that procedure by the radiologist.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the results of a series of patients who received sorafenib as a bridge therapy during the time of deferral for chemoembolisation.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An analysis was made of the records of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that were assessed in the digestive tract neoplasms functional unit (UFNAD) from August 2015 to February 2016, in order to detect those that had been treated with sorafenib as a bridge to chemoembolisation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 14 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were evaluated in the UFNAD in this period, with 9 of them receiving sorafenib as bridge therapy. It was used as initial therapy in 7, after radiofrequency in 2. None of them received the local therapy for which the sorafenib was planned as bridge, and all for reasons other than progression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>If chemoembolisation has to delayed, it is feasible to use sorafenib as a bridging therapy, which can also serve to avoid delay in palliative therapy if the patient turns out not to be a candidate for local therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41581,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 195-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gamo.2016.07.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serie de casos de pacientes con hepatocarcinoma tratados con sorafenib como terapia puente a quimioembolización y finalmente como paliativo\",\"authors\":\"Nora Hilda Chávez Hernández ,&nbsp;Alejandro Antonio Sánchez Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gamo.2016.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are candidates for chemoembolisation that face long delays due to waiting for the imaging assessment of that procedure by the radiologist.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the results of a series of patients who received sorafenib as a bridge therapy during the time of deferral for chemoembolisation.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An analysis was made of the records of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that were assessed in the digestive tract neoplasms functional unit (UFNAD) from August 2015 to February 2016, in order to detect those that had been treated with sorafenib as a bridge to chemoembolisation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 14 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were evaluated in the UFNAD in this period, with 9 of them receiving sorafenib as bridge therapy. It was used as initial therapy in 7, after radiofrequency in 2. None of them received the local therapy for which the sorafenib was planned as bridge, and all for reasons other than progression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>If chemoembolisation has to delayed, it is feasible to use sorafenib as a bridging therapy, which can also serve to avoid delay in palliative therapy if the patient turns out not to be a candidate for local therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 195-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gamo.2016.07.006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665920116300529\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665920116300529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:有些肝细胞癌患者是化疗栓塞的候选者,由于等待放射科医生对该手术的影像学评估而面临长时间的延误。目的描述一系列在延迟化疗栓塞期间接受索拉非尼作为桥接治疗的患者的结果。材料与方法分析2015年8月至2016年2月在消化道肿瘤功能单元(unad)中评估的肝细胞癌患者的记录,以检测哪些患者曾使用索拉非尼作为化疗栓塞的桥梁。结果本研究期间共有14例肝癌患者接受了unad评估,其中9例接受了索拉非尼作为桥接治疗。7例作为初始治疗,2例作为射频治疗。他们都没有接受索拉非尼作为桥梁的局部治疗,所有的原因都不是进展。结论在化疗栓塞需要延迟的情况下,使用索拉非尼作为桥接治疗是可行的,如果患者不适合局部治疗,也可以避免延迟姑息治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Serie de casos de pacientes con hepatocarcinoma tratados con sorafenib como terapia puente a quimioembolización y finalmente como paliativo

Introduction

There are patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are candidates for chemoembolisation that face long delays due to waiting for the imaging assessment of that procedure by the radiologist.

Objective

To describe the results of a series of patients who received sorafenib as a bridge therapy during the time of deferral for chemoembolisation.

Material and methods

An analysis was made of the records of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that were assessed in the digestive tract neoplasms functional unit (UFNAD) from August 2015 to February 2016, in order to detect those that had been treated with sorafenib as a bridge to chemoembolisation.

Results

A total of 14 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were evaluated in the UFNAD in this period, with 9 of them receiving sorafenib as bridge therapy. It was used as initial therapy in 7, after radiofrequency in 2. None of them received the local therapy for which the sorafenib was planned as bridge, and all for reasons other than progression.

Conclusion

If chemoembolisation has to delayed, it is feasible to use sorafenib as a bridging therapy, which can also serve to avoid delay in palliative therapy if the patient turns out not to be a candidate for local therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
255
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信