哮喘患者多剂量特布他林粉末吸入系统(“Turbuhaler”)与沙丁胺醇粉末吸入系统(“Rotahaler”)的剂量效应关系。

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1989-01-01
J M Bogaard, R Slingerland, A F Verbraak
{"title":"哮喘患者多剂量特布他林粉末吸入系统(“Turbuhaler”)与沙丁胺醇粉末吸入系统(“Rotahaler”)的剂量效应关系。","authors":"J M Bogaard,&nbsp;R Slingerland,&nbsp;A F Verbraak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A study was carried out in 8 patients with chronic stable bronchial asthma to compare the bronchodilator response with terbutaline, administered by a recently developed powder inhalation system ('Turbuhaler') and equipotent doses of salbutamol administered by a widely used powder inhaler ('Rotahaler'). Dose-effect relationships with usually applied clinical doses of the bronchodilators were estimated by maximal expiratory flow-volume analysis and airway resistance estimates from body plethysmography. There was no significant difference in clinical response using either inhaler. The equal and opposite changes in forced vital capacity and residual volume with increasing dose indicate an improvement in peripheral airway resistance and, therefore, adequate peripheral powder deposition of the bronchodilators. Only at the highest dose was a mild increase noted in pulse frequency and tremor score with both systems. It is suggested that, because of the multi-dose character, absence of additives, easy handling (no capsule loading) and low inspiratory flow needed for actuation, the 'Turbuhaler' system may be considered preferable for the application of a bronchodilator in children and severely obstructed adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"5 6","pages":"400-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose-effect relationship of terbutaline using a multi-dose powder inhalation system ('Turbuhaler') and salbutamol administered by powder inhalation ('Rotahaler') in asthmatics.\",\"authors\":\"J M Bogaard,&nbsp;R Slingerland,&nbsp;A F Verbraak\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A study was carried out in 8 patients with chronic stable bronchial asthma to compare the bronchodilator response with terbutaline, administered by a recently developed powder inhalation system ('Turbuhaler') and equipotent doses of salbutamol administered by a widely used powder inhaler ('Rotahaler'). Dose-effect relationships with usually applied clinical doses of the bronchodilators were estimated by maximal expiratory flow-volume analysis and airway resistance estimates from body plethysmography. There was no significant difference in clinical response using either inhaler. The equal and opposite changes in forced vital capacity and residual volume with increasing dose indicate an improvement in peripheral airway resistance and, therefore, adequate peripheral powder deposition of the bronchodilators. Only at the highest dose was a mild increase noted in pulse frequency and tremor score with both systems. It is suggested that, because of the multi-dose character, absence of additives, easy handling (no capsule loading) and low inspiratory flow needed for actuation, the 'Turbuhaler' system may be considered preferable for the application of a bronchodilator in children and severely obstructed adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"400-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对8名慢性稳定型支气管哮喘患者进行了一项研究,以比较支气管扩张剂与特布他林的反应,特布他林是由最近开发的粉末吸入系统(“Turbuhaler”)给药,沙丁胺醇是由广泛使用的粉末吸入器(“Rotahaler”)给药。剂量效应与支气管扩张剂临床常用剂量的关系通过最大呼气流量-容积分析和体表容积描记术估计的气道阻力来估计。两种吸入器的临床反应均无显著差异。随着剂量的增加,用力肺活量和残余容积的相等和相反的变化表明周围气道阻力的改善,因此,支气管扩张剂的周围粉末沉积充足。只有在最高剂量时,两种系统的脉冲频率和震颤评分才有轻微的增加。由于其多剂量特性、无添加剂、易于操作(无胶囊装载)和驱动所需的低吸气流量,“Turbuhaler”系统可能被认为是儿童和严重阻塞性成人支气管扩张剂的首选应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dose-effect relationship of terbutaline using a multi-dose powder inhalation system ('Turbuhaler') and salbutamol administered by powder inhalation ('Rotahaler') in asthmatics.

A study was carried out in 8 patients with chronic stable bronchial asthma to compare the bronchodilator response with terbutaline, administered by a recently developed powder inhalation system ('Turbuhaler') and equipotent doses of salbutamol administered by a widely used powder inhaler ('Rotahaler'). Dose-effect relationships with usually applied clinical doses of the bronchodilators were estimated by maximal expiratory flow-volume analysis and airway resistance estimates from body plethysmography. There was no significant difference in clinical response using either inhaler. The equal and opposite changes in forced vital capacity and residual volume with increasing dose indicate an improvement in peripheral airway resistance and, therefore, adequate peripheral powder deposition of the bronchodilators. Only at the highest dose was a mild increase noted in pulse frequency and tremor score with both systems. It is suggested that, because of the multi-dose character, absence of additives, easy handling (no capsule loading) and low inspiratory flow needed for actuation, the 'Turbuhaler' system may be considered preferable for the application of a bronchodilator in children and severely obstructed adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信