根治性前列腺切除术标本处理:取样方法的关键评估

Ming-Tse Sung , Darrell D. Davidson , Rodolfo Montironi , Antonio Lopez-Beltran , Liang Cheng
{"title":"根治性前列腺切除术标本处理:取样方法的关键评估","authors":"Ming-Tse Sung ,&nbsp;Darrell D. Davidson ,&nbsp;Rodolfo Montironi ,&nbsp;Antonio Lopez-Beltran ,&nbsp;Liang Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.cdip.2007.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Radical prostatectomy gives the most accurate and detailed information available for determining prognosis and deciding about adjuvant therapy for prostate cancer. The consistency and reproducibility of observations from these specimens requires a standardised protocol for tissue fixation, sampling, embedding and processing. Although the publication of processing protocols in recent years has led to a convergence of opinions, differences still exist in methods of handling, sampling and processing specimens. In this review article, we incorporate the processing methods for radical prostatectomy addressed in the previous reports and propose a comprehensively standardised approach to evaluate radical prostatectomy specimens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87954,"journal":{"name":"Current diagnostic pathology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Pages 490-498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cdip.2007.06.005","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radical prostatectomy specimen processing: A critical appraisal of sampling methods\",\"authors\":\"Ming-Tse Sung ,&nbsp;Darrell D. Davidson ,&nbsp;Rodolfo Montironi ,&nbsp;Antonio Lopez-Beltran ,&nbsp;Liang Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cdip.2007.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Radical prostatectomy gives the most accurate and detailed information available for determining prognosis and deciding about adjuvant therapy for prostate cancer. The consistency and reproducibility of observations from these specimens requires a standardised protocol for tissue fixation, sampling, embedding and processing. Although the publication of processing protocols in recent years has led to a convergence of opinions, differences still exist in methods of handling, sampling and processing specimens. In this review article, we incorporate the processing methods for radical prostatectomy addressed in the previous reports and propose a comprehensively standardised approach to evaluate radical prostatectomy specimens.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current diagnostic pathology\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 490-498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cdip.2007.06.005\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current diagnostic pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968605307000749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current diagnostic pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968605307000749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

根治性前列腺切除术为确定前列腺癌的预后和辅助治疗提供了最准确和详细的信息。从这些标本中观察到的一致性和可重复性需要一个标准化的组织固定、取样、包埋和处理方案。虽然近年来处理方案的公布导致了意见的趋同,但在处理、取样和处理标本的方法上仍然存在分歧。在这篇综述文章中,我们结合之前报道的根治性前列腺切除术的处理方法,提出一种全面标准化的方法来评估根治性前列腺切除术标本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radical prostatectomy specimen processing: A critical appraisal of sampling methods

Radical prostatectomy gives the most accurate and detailed information available for determining prognosis and deciding about adjuvant therapy for prostate cancer. The consistency and reproducibility of observations from these specimens requires a standardised protocol for tissue fixation, sampling, embedding and processing. Although the publication of processing protocols in recent years has led to a convergence of opinions, differences still exist in methods of handling, sampling and processing specimens. In this review article, we incorporate the processing methods for radical prostatectomy addressed in the previous reports and propose a comprehensively standardised approach to evaluate radical prostatectomy specimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信