支持正在进行的复制工作的三个建议:检查表、视觉比较和评分量表

Q2 Psychology
Paz Fortier, Louis A. Schmidt
{"title":"支持正在进行的复制工作的三个建议:检查表、视觉比较和评分量表","authors":"Paz Fortier,&nbsp;Louis A. Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2021.100045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We propose three practical suggestions that might be used in tandem to help address enduring replication challenges: (1) a methodology checklist to increase awareness of potentially overlooked variables and scaffold the design of replication attempts, (2) a means of facilitating visual side-by-side comparisons of reference and replication methodologies to increase replication fidelity, and (3) a broader methodology fidelity rating system to capture the nuance associated with direct replication. Incorporating these suggestions into replication efforts could facilitate improved coordination of multi-site replication attempts and offer a standardized means of assessing methodological fidelity for replication submissions and data review.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Suggestions to Support Ongoing Replication Efforts: A Checklist, Visual Comparison, and Rating Scale\",\"authors\":\"Paz Fortier,&nbsp;Louis A. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.metip.2021.100045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We propose three practical suggestions that might be used in tandem to help address enduring replication challenges: (1) a methodology checklist to increase awareness of potentially overlooked variables and scaffold the design of replication attempts, (2) a means of facilitating visual side-by-side comparisons of reference and replication methodologies to increase replication fidelity, and (3) a broader methodology fidelity rating system to capture the nuance associated with direct replication. Incorporating these suggestions into replication efforts could facilitate improved coordination of multi-site replication attempts and offer a standardized means of assessing methodological fidelity for replication submissions and data review.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100045\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260121000023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260121000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了三个实用的建议,可以用来帮助解决持久的复制挑战:(1)一个方法清单,以提高对潜在被忽视的变量的认识,并指导复制尝试的设计;(2)一种促进参考和复制方法的可视化并排比较的方法,以提高复制保真度;(3)一个更广泛的方法保真度评级系统,以捕捉与直接复制相关的细微差别。将这些建议纳入复制工作可促进改进多站点复制尝试的协调,并为复制提交和数据审查提供一种评估方法保真度的标准化手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Three Suggestions to Support Ongoing Replication Efforts: A Checklist, Visual Comparison, and Rating Scale

Three Suggestions to Support Ongoing Replication Efforts: A Checklist, Visual Comparison, and Rating Scale

We propose three practical suggestions that might be used in tandem to help address enduring replication challenges: (1) a methodology checklist to increase awareness of potentially overlooked variables and scaffold the design of replication attempts, (2) a means of facilitating visual side-by-side comparisons of reference and replication methodologies to increase replication fidelity, and (3) a broader methodology fidelity rating system to capture the nuance associated with direct replication. Incorporating these suggestions into replication efforts could facilitate improved coordination of multi-site replication attempts and offer a standardized means of assessing methodological fidelity for replication submissions and data review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信