M.E. Rioja Martín , G. Ortega Pérez , L.J. Cabañas Montero , V. Muñoz-Madero , L. Cabañas Navarro
{"title":"乳晕下注射:乳腺癌前哨淋巴结选择性活检假阴性的潜在原因","authors":"M.E. Rioja Martín , G. Ortega Pérez , L.J. Cabañas Montero , V. Muñoz-Madero , L. Cabañas Navarro","doi":"10.1016/j.remngl.2010.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sentinel node biopsy has become the standard practice for lymph node staging in early stage breast cancer. However, uncertainty remains regarding the best method of radiotracer/dye injection. Currently, the subareolar injection is being widely used because of its technical simplicity and higher rates of SN location versus the so-called deep techniques (peritumoral, intratumoral) that require greater specialization and greater use of resources in the non-palpable lesions.</p><p>We present a case of a discrepancy between both techniques that could have caused a false negative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101111,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.remngl.2010.07.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subareolar injection: A potential cause of false negative in the selective biopsy of the sentinel node in breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"M.E. Rioja Martín , G. Ortega Pérez , L.J. Cabañas Montero , V. Muñoz-Madero , L. Cabañas Navarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.remngl.2010.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sentinel node biopsy has become the standard practice for lymph node staging in early stage breast cancer. However, uncertainty remains regarding the best method of radiotracer/dye injection. Currently, the subareolar injection is being widely used because of its technical simplicity and higher rates of SN location versus the so-called deep techniques (peritumoral, intratumoral) that require greater specialization and greater use of resources in the non-palpable lesions.</p><p>We present a case of a discrepancy between both techniques that could have caused a false negative.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.remngl.2010.07.002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1578200X11000052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1578200X11000052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Subareolar injection: A potential cause of false negative in the selective biopsy of the sentinel node in breast cancer
Sentinel node biopsy has become the standard practice for lymph node staging in early stage breast cancer. However, uncertainty remains regarding the best method of radiotracer/dye injection. Currently, the subareolar injection is being widely used because of its technical simplicity and higher rates of SN location versus the so-called deep techniques (peritumoral, intratumoral) that require greater specialization and greater use of resources in the non-palpable lesions.
We present a case of a discrepancy between both techniques that could have caused a false negative.