现代护士长实施的结果:信任护理主任的看法和案例研究结果

Mick Ashman , Susan Read , Jan Savage , Cherill Scott
{"title":"现代护士长实施的结果:信任护理主任的看法和案例研究结果","authors":"Mick Ashman ,&nbsp;Susan Read ,&nbsp;Jan Savage ,&nbsp;Cherill Scott","doi":"10.1016/j.cein.2006.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine one aspect of a larger study evaluating the modern matron role, comparing trust nursing directors’ perceived outcomes of introducing matrons to the NHS with actual evidence of such outcomes gathered in ten subsequent case studies.</p></div><div><h3>Design, methods and outcomes</h3><p>In a national survey, nursing directors stated their perceived outcomes arising from introduction of matrons; these outcomes were compared with case study findings.</p><p><em>Participants and settings:</em></p></div><div><h3>Survey</h3><p>Questionnaire to Directors of Nursing in all 545 NHS trusts in England in 2003.</p></div><div><h3>Case Studies</h3><p>Ten NHS trusts purposively selected to include different types in varied settings. Data collection involved interviews and questionnaires to matrons, other relevant staff and some patients, and use of routinely collected data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty percent of 414 survey respondents reported positive outcomes such as improvements in staff management, leadership, patient environment and standards of care, whereas only 36% reported negative outcomes such as role ambiguity and role overload for matrons. Most of the reported positive outcomes were recognised in subsequent case studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Positive outcomes attributed by directors of nursing to matron appointments appeared to outweigh negative outcomes. There was evidence of these positive outcomes in subsequent case studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87580,"journal":{"name":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages e44-e52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cein.2006.10.008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of modern matron implementation: Trust nursing directors’ perceptions and case study findings\",\"authors\":\"Mick Ashman ,&nbsp;Susan Read ,&nbsp;Jan Savage ,&nbsp;Cherill Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cein.2006.10.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine one aspect of a larger study evaluating the modern matron role, comparing trust nursing directors’ perceived outcomes of introducing matrons to the NHS with actual evidence of such outcomes gathered in ten subsequent case studies.</p></div><div><h3>Design, methods and outcomes</h3><p>In a national survey, nursing directors stated their perceived outcomes arising from introduction of matrons; these outcomes were compared with case study findings.</p><p><em>Participants and settings:</em></p></div><div><h3>Survey</h3><p>Questionnaire to Directors of Nursing in all 545 NHS trusts in England in 2003.</p></div><div><h3>Case Studies</h3><p>Ten NHS trusts purposively selected to include different types in varied settings. Data collection involved interviews and questionnaires to matrons, other relevant staff and some patients, and use of routinely collected data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty percent of 414 survey respondents reported positive outcomes such as improvements in staff management, leadership, patient environment and standards of care, whereas only 36% reported negative outcomes such as role ambiguity and role overload for matrons. Most of the reported positive outcomes were recognised in subsequent case studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Positive outcomes attributed by directors of nursing to matron appointments appeared to outweigh negative outcomes. There was evidence of these positive outcomes in subsequent case studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical effectiveness in nursing\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Pages e44-e52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cein.2006.10.008\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical effectiveness in nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136190040600080X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136190040600080X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的研究一个更大的研究评估现代护士长的角色的一个方面,比较信任护理主任的感知结果介绍护士长到NHS与实际证据收集这样的结果在十个后续案例研究。设计、方法和结果在一项全国调查中,护理主任陈述了他们认为引入护士长所产生的结果;这些结果与个案研究结果进行比较。参与者和环境:2003年对英格兰所有545个NHS信托机构的护理主管进行的调查问卷。案例研究NHS信托有目的地选择包括不同类型的不同设置。数据收集包括对护士长、其他相关工作人员和部分患者进行访谈和问卷调查,并使用常规收集的数据。结果在414名受访者中,60%的人报告了积极的结果,如员工管理、领导力、患者环境和护理标准的改善,而只有36%的人报告了消极的结果,如护理员的角色模糊和角色过载。大多数报告的积极结果在随后的案例研究中得到了认可。结论护理主任对护士长任用的积极影响大于消极影响。在随后的案例研究中有这些积极结果的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of modern matron implementation: Trust nursing directors’ perceptions and case study findings

Objectives

To examine one aspect of a larger study evaluating the modern matron role, comparing trust nursing directors’ perceived outcomes of introducing matrons to the NHS with actual evidence of such outcomes gathered in ten subsequent case studies.

Design, methods and outcomes

In a national survey, nursing directors stated their perceived outcomes arising from introduction of matrons; these outcomes were compared with case study findings.

Participants and settings:

Survey

Questionnaire to Directors of Nursing in all 545 NHS trusts in England in 2003.

Case Studies

Ten NHS trusts purposively selected to include different types in varied settings. Data collection involved interviews and questionnaires to matrons, other relevant staff and some patients, and use of routinely collected data.

Results

Sixty percent of 414 survey respondents reported positive outcomes such as improvements in staff management, leadership, patient environment and standards of care, whereas only 36% reported negative outcomes such as role ambiguity and role overload for matrons. Most of the reported positive outcomes were recognised in subsequent case studies.

Conclusions

Positive outcomes attributed by directors of nursing to matron appointments appeared to outweigh negative outcomes. There was evidence of these positive outcomes in subsequent case studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信