量化晕轮效应在学生评教中的作用:对Michela的回应

IF 4.1 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.1080/02602938.2023.2180484

Edmund Cannon, Giam Pietro Cipriani

{"title":"量化晕轮效应在学生评教中的作用:对Michela的回应","authors":"Edmund Cannon, Giam Pietro Cipriani","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2023.2180484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Cannon and Cipriani (Citation2022) we contributed to the literature on halo effects in student evaluations of teaching (SETs) by proposing and implementing a method to separate the effect of halo effects in student responses from an external measure of the item being assessed. Our paper has been criticised by Michela (Citation2022). Many of his comments about problems with SETs are not directly relevant as they discuss issues other than halo. We re-visit our data and confirm that our conclusion that halo does not necessarily make SETs uninformative is correct. However, we do find heterogeneity in the importance of halo between SETs from two different campuses.","PeriodicalId":48267,"journal":{"name":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying halo effects in students’ evaluation of teaching: a response to Michela\",\"authors\":\"Edmund Cannon, Giam Pietro Cipriani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02602938.2023.2180484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Cannon and Cipriani (Citation2022) we contributed to the literature on halo effects in student evaluations of teaching (SETs) by proposing and implementing a method to separate the effect of halo effects in student responses from an external measure of the item being assessed. Our paper has been criticised by Michela (Citation2022). Many of his comments about problems with SETs are not directly relevant as they discuss issues other than halo. We re-visit our data and confirm that our conclusion that halo does not necessarily make SETs uninformative is correct. However, we do find heterogeneity in the importance of halo between SETs from two different campuses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2180484\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2180484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在Cannon和Cipriani (Citation2022)中，我们提出并实施了一种方法，将学生反应中的光环效应与被评估项目的外部测量分开，从而为学生教学评估(SETs)中的光环效应的文献做出了贡献。我们的论文被Michela (Citation2022)批评过。他的许多关于set问题的评论都不是直接相关的，因为他们讨论的是光环以外的问题。我们重新访问我们的数据，并确认我们的结论，即光晕不一定使集合无信息是正确的。然而，我们确实发现来自两个不同校园的set对光环的重要性存在差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Quantifying halo effects in students’ evaluation of teaching: a response to Michela

In Cannon and Cipriani (Citation2022) we contributed to the literature on halo effects in student evaluations of teaching (SETs) by proposing and implementing a method to separate the effect of halo effects in student responses from an external measure of the item being assessed. Our paper has been criticised by Michela (Citation2022). Many of his comments about problems with SETs are not directly relevant as they discuss issues other than halo. We re-visit our data and confirm that our conclusion that halo does not necessarily make SETs uninformative is correct. However, we do find heterogeneity in the importance of halo between SETs from two different campuses.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

11.20

自引率

15.90%

发文量