早期现代史上的典和经典?

IF 0.2 3区文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN

DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1163/18796583-12340092

Oliver Bach

{"title":"早期现代史上的典和经典?","authors":"Oliver Bach","doi":"10.1163/18796583-12340092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this article is to outline several aspects of a canon of early modern German literature as they had been discussed by a volume Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit (ed. Regina Toepfer) in 2022. In the light of recent criticism of any conception of canon as an outcome of hegemonial thinking as well as considering the increasing disregard of early modern literature even in universities, it is foremost the Early Modern Literature Studies who are urged to discuss the question of whether there are sufficient reasons for upholding a literary canon at least to a certain degree and whether texts of the early modern period can or must be part of such a canon.","PeriodicalId":52008,"journal":{"name":"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kanon und Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit?\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Bach\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18796583-12340092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this article is to outline several aspects of a canon of early modern German literature as they had been discussed by a volume Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit (ed. Regina Toepfer) in 2022. In the light of recent criticism of any conception of canon as an outcome of hegemonial thinking as well as considering the increasing disregard of early modern literature even in universities, it is foremost the Early Modern Literature Studies who are urged to discuss the question of whether there are sufficient reasons for upholding a literary canon at least to a certain degree and whether texts of the early modern period can or must be part of such a canon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18796583-12340092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18796583-12340092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文的目的是概述早期现代德国文学经典的几个方面，因为它们在2022年被一卷《古典文学》(Regina Toepfer编辑)所讨论。鉴于最近对经典概念的批评是霸权思维的结果，以及考虑到甚至在大学里对早期现代文学的日益漠视，早期现代文学研究首先被敦促讨论是否有足够的理由至少在一定程度上坚持文学经典，以及早期现代时期的文本是否可以或必须成为这种经典的一部分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Kanon und Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit?

Abstract The aim of this article is to outline several aspects of a canon of early modern German literature as they had been discussed by a volume Klassiker der Frühen Neuzeit (ed. Regina Toepfer) in 2022. In the light of recent criticism of any conception of canon as an outcome of hegemonial thinking as well as considering the increasing disregard of early modern literature even in universities, it is foremost the Early Modern Literature Studies who are urged to discuss the question of whether there are sufficient reasons for upholding a literary canon at least to a certain degree and whether texts of the early modern period can or must be part of such a canon.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

DAPHNIS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MITTLERE DEUTSCHE LITERATUR LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Der "Daphnis" ist als Organ für die Erforschung der deutschen und neulateinischen Literatur vom Ausgang des 14. Jahrhunderts bis zur Mitte des 18. Jahrhunderts konzipiert worden. Er berücksichtigt darüber hinaus unter komparatistischem Aspekt auch die Beziehungen der Mittleren Deutschen Literatur zu den europäischen Literaturen dieses Zeitraums und widmet sich Problemen der frühneuhochdeutschen und neulateinischen Sprache.