{"title":"语言问题:工程研究写作","authors":"Jessica M. Smith","doi":"10.1080/19378629.2023.2243774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the things I appreciate about the engineering studies community is that we are welcoming of new scholars, both those who are early in their career and those who are turning to engineering studies after having developed their career in other academic spaces. Our reviewers are generous with their time and attention to manuscripts, and our conferences, workshops and other meet-ups are always lively. If you have not yet connected with our International Network for Engineering Studies to keep in touch, please do so by visiting https://www.inesweb.org/. Sometimes the most challenging barriers to participation in new intellectual networks are the unspoken rules about how we write. In an effort to demystify our editorial review process, I will share a few of the common patterns that I am noticing so that potential authors can write with them in mind.","PeriodicalId":49207,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language Matters: Writing for <i>Engineering Studies</i>\",\"authors\":\"Jessica M. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19378629.2023.2243774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the things I appreciate about the engineering studies community is that we are welcoming of new scholars, both those who are early in their career and those who are turning to engineering studies after having developed their career in other academic spaces. Our reviewers are generous with their time and attention to manuscripts, and our conferences, workshops and other meet-ups are always lively. If you have not yet connected with our International Network for Engineering Studies to keep in touch, please do so by visiting https://www.inesweb.org/. Sometimes the most challenging barriers to participation in new intellectual networks are the unspoken rules about how we write. In an effort to demystify our editorial review process, I will share a few of the common patterns that I am noticing so that potential authors can write with them in mind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Studies\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2023.2243774\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2023.2243774","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
One of the things I appreciate about the engineering studies community is that we are welcoming of new scholars, both those who are early in their career and those who are turning to engineering studies after having developed their career in other academic spaces. Our reviewers are generous with their time and attention to manuscripts, and our conferences, workshops and other meet-ups are always lively. If you have not yet connected with our International Network for Engineering Studies to keep in touch, please do so by visiting https://www.inesweb.org/. Sometimes the most challenging barriers to participation in new intellectual networks are the unspoken rules about how we write. In an effort to demystify our editorial review process, I will share a few of the common patterns that I am noticing so that potential authors can write with them in mind.
Engineering StudiesENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Engineering Studies is an interdisciplinary, international journal devoted to the scholarly study of engineers and engineering. Its mission is threefold:
1. to advance critical analysis in historical, social, cultural, political, philosophical, rhetorical, and organizational studies of engineers and engineering;
2. to help build and serve diverse communities of researchers interested in engineering studies;
3. to link scholarly work in engineering studies with broader discussions and debates about engineering education, research, practice, policy, and representation.
The editors of Engineering Studies are interested in papers that consider the following questions:
• How does this paper enhance critical understanding of engineers or engineering?
• What are the relationships among the technical and nontechnical dimensions of engineering practices, and how do these relationships change over time and from place to place?