印度西部一家三级医院急性钩端螺旋体病的血清患病率

MahmoodD Al-Mendalawi
{"title":"印度西部一家三级医院急性钩端螺旋体病的血清患病率","authors":"MahmoodD Al-Mendalawi","doi":"10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_264_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, We stumbled upon an engaging research paper published in Volume 9, Issue 4 of the MGM Journal of Medical Sciences, spanning pages 517-21, October to December 2022. Within this study, Bavejaet al.[1] utilized both serology and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. The seroprevalence of Leptospira spp. was 19.78% in a cohort of Indian patients. The diagnosis of leptospirosis usually depends on serology and molecular detection. The serology often takes many days before the result becomes positive after the start of the illness. In addition, the serology necessitates skilled handling and maintaining live Leptospira cells representing all serogroups.[2] The molecular diagnostic techniques, including real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are faster and more sensitive to firm the diagnosis and could also detect the infection before the appearance of antibodies. On targeting the lip L32 gene, PCR could detect Leptospira deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in various clinical samples.[3] We believe that if Baveja et al.[1] used PCR in the study methodology rather than ELISA, a more accurate estimate of the leptospirosis seroprevalence might be generated. Despite that limitation, the reported substantial leptospirosis seroprevalence (19.78%),[1] which is nearly comparable to 26.6% recently reported by Shukla et al.,[4] urges the need to implement strict public health interventions to combat that harmful zoonotic infection in India. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.","PeriodicalId":52587,"journal":{"name":"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seroprevalence of acute leptospirosis in a tertiary care hospital in western India\",\"authors\":\"MahmoodD Al-Mendalawi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_264_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dear Editor, We stumbled upon an engaging research paper published in Volume 9, Issue 4 of the MGM Journal of Medical Sciences, spanning pages 517-21, October to December 2022. Within this study, Bavejaet al.[1] utilized both serology and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. The seroprevalence of Leptospira spp. was 19.78% in a cohort of Indian patients. The diagnosis of leptospirosis usually depends on serology and molecular detection. The serology often takes many days before the result becomes positive after the start of the illness. In addition, the serology necessitates skilled handling and maintaining live Leptospira cells representing all serogroups.[2] The molecular diagnostic techniques, including real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are faster and more sensitive to firm the diagnosis and could also detect the infection before the appearance of antibodies. On targeting the lip L32 gene, PCR could detect Leptospira deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in various clinical samples.[3] We believe that if Baveja et al.[1] used PCR in the study methodology rather than ELISA, a more accurate estimate of the leptospirosis seroprevalence might be generated. Despite that limitation, the reported substantial leptospirosis seroprevalence (19.78%),[1] which is nearly comparable to 26.6% recently reported by Shukla et al.,[4] urges the need to implement strict public health interventions to combat that harmful zoonotic infection in India. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_264_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_264_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亲爱的编辑:我们偶然发现了一篇引人入胜的研究论文,发表在《米高梅医学科学杂志》第9卷第4期,横跨517-21页,2022年10月至12月。在这项研究中,Bavejaet al.[1]同时使用了血清学和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术。在印度患者队列中,钩端螺旋体的血清阳性率为19.78%。钩端螺旋体病的诊断通常依赖于血清学和分子检测。在疾病开始后,血清学检查通常需要许多天才能显示阳性。此外,血清学需要熟练地处理和维持代表所有血清群的活钩端螺旋体细胞。[2]包括实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)在内的分子诊断技术更快、更敏感地确定诊断,还可以在抗体出现之前检测感染。PCR以唇部L32基因为靶点,可检测各种临床样品中的钩端螺旋体脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)[3]。我们认为,如果Baveja等[1]在研究方法中使用PCR而不是ELISA,可能会产生更准确的钩端螺旋体病血清患病率估计。尽管存在这一限制,但报告的钩端螺旋体病血清患病率(19.78%)[1]与Shukla等人最近报告的26.6%[4]几乎相当,这促使印度有必要实施严格的公共卫生干预措施,以对抗这种有害的人畜共患感染。财政支持及赞助无。利益冲突没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seroprevalence of acute leptospirosis in a tertiary care hospital in western India
Dear Editor, We stumbled upon an engaging research paper published in Volume 9, Issue 4 of the MGM Journal of Medical Sciences, spanning pages 517-21, October to December 2022. Within this study, Bavejaet al.[1] utilized both serology and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. The seroprevalence of Leptospira spp. was 19.78% in a cohort of Indian patients. The diagnosis of leptospirosis usually depends on serology and molecular detection. The serology often takes many days before the result becomes positive after the start of the illness. In addition, the serology necessitates skilled handling and maintaining live Leptospira cells representing all serogroups.[2] The molecular diagnostic techniques, including real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are faster and more sensitive to firm the diagnosis and could also detect the infection before the appearance of antibodies. On targeting the lip L32 gene, PCR could detect Leptospira deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in various clinical samples.[3] We believe that if Baveja et al.[1] used PCR in the study methodology rather than ELISA, a more accurate estimate of the leptospirosis seroprevalence might be generated. Despite that limitation, the reported substantial leptospirosis seroprevalence (19.78%),[1] which is nearly comparable to 26.6% recently reported by Shukla et al.,[4] urges the need to implement strict public health interventions to combat that harmful zoonotic infection in India. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信