优化图书馆捐赠图书展示:SMART和WASPAS的比较

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Afifah Trista Ayunda, Wahyu Tisno Atmojo
{"title":"优化图书馆捐赠图书展示:SMART和WASPAS的比较","authors":"Afifah Trista Ayunda, Wahyu Tisno Atmojo","doi":"10.32832/moneter.v11i2.448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The book display has a significant impact on visitor experience and the efficiency of finding reading materials in the library. In this context, optimizing effective and systematic decisions becomes crucial. This research employs the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) and WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) approaches in selecting the optimal book display for donations. The SMART method assists in formulating specific criteria and indicators to measure effectiveness, while the WASPAS method utilizes assessment principles based on priority with weighted criteria to consider diverse aspects. The required data for this study includes information about criteria and weighting of the book display. This data will be comprehensively analyzed using both of these approach methods. The accuracy level testing resulted in a value of 99.9917% for the SMART method, which is slightly better than WASPAS with a value of 99.9916%. Based on the above suitability level calculation, the SMART approach is more relevant in this situation to address the issue of recommending donation book displays in the library with the goal of minimizing space and improving book search efficiency.","PeriodicalId":36737,"journal":{"name":"Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Library Donation Book Display: SMART and WASPAS Comparison\",\"authors\":\"Afifah Trista Ayunda, Wahyu Tisno Atmojo\",\"doi\":\"10.32832/moneter.v11i2.448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The book display has a significant impact on visitor experience and the efficiency of finding reading materials in the library. In this context, optimizing effective and systematic decisions becomes crucial. This research employs the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) and WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) approaches in selecting the optimal book display for donations. The SMART method assists in formulating specific criteria and indicators to measure effectiveness, while the WASPAS method utilizes assessment principles based on priority with weighted criteria to consider diverse aspects. The required data for this study includes information about criteria and weighting of the book display. This data will be comprehensively analyzed using both of these approach methods. The accuracy level testing resulted in a value of 99.9917% for the SMART method, which is slightly better than WASPAS with a value of 99.9916%. Based on the above suitability level calculation, the SMART approach is more relevant in this situation to address the issue of recommending donation book displays in the library with the goal of minimizing space and improving book search efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32832/moneter.v11i2.448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32832/moneter.v11i2.448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

图书陈列对读者体验和在图书馆查找阅读资料的效率有着重要的影响。在这种情况下,优化有效和系统的决策变得至关重要。本研究采用SMART (Specific, Measurable,可实现,Relevant, Time-bound)和WASPAS (Weighted aggregate Sum Product Assessment)方法来选择最佳的捐赠图书陈列。SMART方法有助于制定具体的标准和指标来衡量有效性,而WASPAS方法利用基于优先级的评估原则和加权标准来考虑各个方面。本研究所需的数据包括关于图书展示的标准和权重的信息。这些数据将使用这两种方法进行综合分析。SMART方法的准确度水平测试结果为99.9917%,略优于WASPAS的99.9916%。基于以上的适宜性水平计算,SMART方法更适合于这种情况,以最小化空间和提高图书检索效率为目标来解决图书馆捐赠图书展示推荐问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Library Donation Book Display: SMART and WASPAS Comparison
The book display has a significant impact on visitor experience and the efficiency of finding reading materials in the library. In this context, optimizing effective and systematic decisions becomes crucial. This research employs the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) and WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) approaches in selecting the optimal book display for donations. The SMART method assists in formulating specific criteria and indicators to measure effectiveness, while the WASPAS method utilizes assessment principles based on priority with weighted criteria to consider diverse aspects. The required data for this study includes information about criteria and weighting of the book display. This data will be comprehensively analyzed using both of these approach methods. The accuracy level testing resulted in a value of 99.9917% for the SMART method, which is slightly better than WASPAS with a value of 99.9916%. Based on the above suitability level calculation, the SMART approach is more relevant in this situation to address the issue of recommending donation book displays in the library with the goal of minimizing space and improving book search efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan
Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信