体育公共管理:巴西和葡萄牙组织结构的描述和比较分析

IF 1.2 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Pedro Fernando Avalone Athayde, António Figueiredo
{"title":"体育公共管理:巴西和葡萄牙组织结构的描述和比较分析","authors":"Pedro Fernando Avalone Athayde, António Figueiredo","doi":"10.47197/retos.v51.101356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article delves into the public management of sports policies in Brazil and Portugal, relying on a descriptive and comparative analysis of the organizational structures adopted by the two countries. The study takes the form of descriptive-analytical research employing a qualitative approach with an exploratory scope. The employed methodologies encompass bibliographic review and documentary analysis. The primary objective was to describe and conduct a comparative analysis of the public management of the national sports policies in Brazil and Portugal, using the organizational structures in the sector as a benchmark, up until 2022. The findings reveal that both countries share a history of tethering or subordinating sports to various realms of state activities. This aspect could be interpreted as indicative of institutional fragility, highlighting a diminished political legitimacy of the sector and a lesser integration into the governmental agenda. Distinguishing between them, a noteworthy discourse revolves around the establishment of a national sports system. This system delineates competencies, responsibilities, and modes of interaction. In this regard, the Portuguese context appears to make more significant strides compared to the Brazilian scenario. Keywords: public management; sport; comparative analysis; organizational structure; public policy","PeriodicalId":46621,"journal":{"name":"Retos-Nuevas Tendencias en Educacion Fisica Deporte y Recreacion","volume":"135 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public management of sport: a description and comparative analysis of the organizational structure in Brazil and Portugal\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Fernando Avalone Athayde, António Figueiredo\",\"doi\":\"10.47197/retos.v51.101356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article delves into the public management of sports policies in Brazil and Portugal, relying on a descriptive and comparative analysis of the organizational structures adopted by the two countries. The study takes the form of descriptive-analytical research employing a qualitative approach with an exploratory scope. The employed methodologies encompass bibliographic review and documentary analysis. The primary objective was to describe and conduct a comparative analysis of the public management of the national sports policies in Brazil and Portugal, using the organizational structures in the sector as a benchmark, up until 2022. The findings reveal that both countries share a history of tethering or subordinating sports to various realms of state activities. This aspect could be interpreted as indicative of institutional fragility, highlighting a diminished political legitimacy of the sector and a lesser integration into the governmental agenda. Distinguishing between them, a noteworthy discourse revolves around the establishment of a national sports system. This system delineates competencies, responsibilities, and modes of interaction. In this regard, the Portuguese context appears to make more significant strides compared to the Brazilian scenario. Keywords: public management; sport; comparative analysis; organizational structure; public policy\",\"PeriodicalId\":46621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retos-Nuevas Tendencias en Educacion Fisica Deporte y Recreacion\",\"volume\":\"135 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retos-Nuevas Tendencias en Educacion Fisica Deporte y Recreacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v51.101356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retos-Nuevas Tendencias en Educacion Fisica Deporte y Recreacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v51.101356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对巴西和葡萄牙两国采用的组织结构进行描述和比较分析,深入研究了两国体育政策的公共管理。本研究采用描述性分析研究的形式,采用定性方法进行探索性研究。所采用的方法包括书目审查和文献分析。主要目标是描述并对巴西和葡萄牙国家体育政策的公共管理进行比较分析,以该部门的组织结构为基准,直到2022年。调查结果显示,这两个国家都有将体育运动捆绑或从属于各个国家活动领域的历史。这方面可以解释为体制脆弱性的表现,突出表明该部门的政治合法性减弱,融入政府议程的程度降低。区分两者,一个值得注意的论述是围绕着国家体育制度的建立。这个系统描述了能力、责任和交互模式。在这方面,与巴西的情况相比,葡萄牙的情况似乎取得了更大的进步。关键词:公共管理;体育运动;比较分析;组织结构;公共政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public management of sport: a description and comparative analysis of the organizational structure in Brazil and Portugal
This article delves into the public management of sports policies in Brazil and Portugal, relying on a descriptive and comparative analysis of the organizational structures adopted by the two countries. The study takes the form of descriptive-analytical research employing a qualitative approach with an exploratory scope. The employed methodologies encompass bibliographic review and documentary analysis. The primary objective was to describe and conduct a comparative analysis of the public management of the national sports policies in Brazil and Portugal, using the organizational structures in the sector as a benchmark, up until 2022. The findings reveal that both countries share a history of tethering or subordinating sports to various realms of state activities. This aspect could be interpreted as indicative of institutional fragility, highlighting a diminished political legitimacy of the sector and a lesser integration into the governmental agenda. Distinguishing between them, a noteworthy discourse revolves around the establishment of a national sports system. This system delineates competencies, responsibilities, and modes of interaction. In this regard, the Portuguese context appears to make more significant strides compared to the Brazilian scenario. Keywords: public management; sport; comparative analysis; organizational structure; public policy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
61.50%
发文量
291
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信