道绰净土佛教中的修行与其他力量

Michael Conway
{"title":"道绰净土佛教中的修行与其他力量","authors":"Michael Conway","doi":"10.38144/tkt.2023.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Daochuo 道綽 (562–645) is revered as a patriarch of both the Pure Land and the True Pure Land schools of Buddhism in Japan. In his Anleji 安楽集 he makes a variety of arguments about the necessity and importance of relying on the “path of easy practice” whereby one aspires to enlightenment through birth in the Amituo’s Pure Land based on the working of the other power of Amituo’s vows. Daochuo’s prioritization of the Pure Land teachings in well know both inside and outside of Japan, but previous scholarship has focused particularly on Daochuo’s arguments that the Pure Land teachings should be taken as the centerpiece of Buddhism due to the degenerate nature of the age and the inferior capacities of the people. Therefore, previous scholarship in both Japanese and English on Daochuo has primarily characterized him as offering an easy practice for incompetent people who were unlucky enough to have been born at a time far removed from Śākyamuni.Through a careful analysis of passages in the second fascicle of the Anleji, in the first section of this paper I show that this understanding of Daochuo’s view of the “path of easy practice” fails to take into account the severity of his criticisms of the Buddhist practices that were preached in the Buddhist scriptures and prevalent at his time and therefore mischaracterizes the nature of his choice of Pure Land Buddhism as the most effective and excellent form of Buddhism and the only avenue for anyone at any time, regardless of their individual capacities or temporal relation to a Buddha, to genuinely fulfill the Mahayana ideal.Although Daochuo took a very broadminded stance toward practice, holding that any practice undertaken with a desire to be born in the Pure Land would qualify the practitioner to receive the benefits of the other power of Amituo’s vows, there are also several points in the Anleji where he singles out the practice of the nianfo 念仏, particularly vocal recitation of the nianfo, as the most appropriate and effective practice for people to engage in. In the second section of this paper, I introduce the passages where Daochuo encourages the practice of the nianfo and show that he prioritized it both because he held it was most appropriate for the sentient beings of the Latter Days of the Dharma and because it afforded practitioners with a variety of benefits that were not available to those who sought after birth in the Pure Land through other practices.","PeriodicalId":488690,"journal":{"name":"Távol-keleti Tanulmányok","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice and Other Power in Daochuo’s Pure Land Buddhism\",\"authors\":\"Michael Conway\",\"doi\":\"10.38144/tkt.2023.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Daochuo 道綽 (562–645) is revered as a patriarch of both the Pure Land and the True Pure Land schools of Buddhism in Japan. In his Anleji 安楽集 he makes a variety of arguments about the necessity and importance of relying on the “path of easy practice” whereby one aspires to enlightenment through birth in the Amituo’s Pure Land based on the working of the other power of Amituo’s vows. Daochuo’s prioritization of the Pure Land teachings in well know both inside and outside of Japan, but previous scholarship has focused particularly on Daochuo’s arguments that the Pure Land teachings should be taken as the centerpiece of Buddhism due to the degenerate nature of the age and the inferior capacities of the people. Therefore, previous scholarship in both Japanese and English on Daochuo has primarily characterized him as offering an easy practice for incompetent people who were unlucky enough to have been born at a time far removed from Śākyamuni.Through a careful analysis of passages in the second fascicle of the Anleji, in the first section of this paper I show that this understanding of Daochuo’s view of the “path of easy practice” fails to take into account the severity of his criticisms of the Buddhist practices that were preached in the Buddhist scriptures and prevalent at his time and therefore mischaracterizes the nature of his choice of Pure Land Buddhism as the most effective and excellent form of Buddhism and the only avenue for anyone at any time, regardless of their individual capacities or temporal relation to a Buddha, to genuinely fulfill the Mahayana ideal.Although Daochuo took a very broadminded stance toward practice, holding that any practice undertaken with a desire to be born in the Pure Land would qualify the practitioner to receive the benefits of the other power of Amituo’s vows, there are also several points in the Anleji where he singles out the practice of the nianfo 念仏, particularly vocal recitation of the nianfo, as the most appropriate and effective practice for people to engage in. In the second section of this paper, I introduce the passages where Daochuo encourages the practice of the nianfo and show that he prioritized it both because he held it was most appropriate for the sentient beings of the Latter Days of the Dharma and because it afforded practitioners with a variety of benefits that were not available to those who sought after birth in the Pure Land through other practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":488690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Távol-keleti Tanulmányok\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Távol-keleti Tanulmányok\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38144/tkt.2023.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Távol-keleti Tanulmányok","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38144/tkt.2023.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道创氏綽(562-645)在日本被尊为净土宗和真净土宗的宗师。在他的《安乐集》中,他对依靠“易修之路”的必要性和重要性进行了各种论证,即一个人渴望通过出生在阿弥陀净土而获得觉悟,这是基于阿弥陀誓言的另一种力量的作用。在日本国内外,人们都知道道琢对净土教的重视,但之前的学者特别关注道琢的观点,即净土教应该被视为佛教的核心,因为时代的堕落和人们的低下能力。因此,以前的日本和英国学者对道出的研究主要是将他描述为为那些不幸出生在远离Śākyamuni的时代的无能的人提供了一种简单的练习。通过对《安乐集》第二卷的仔细分析,在本文的第一部分中,我展示了这种对道觉的观点的理解没有考虑到他对佛教实践的批评的严重性,这些佛教实践是在佛教经文中宣扬的,在他那个时代很流行,因此错误地描述了他选择净土佛教的本质,作为最有效和最优秀的佛教形式,是任何人在任何时候唯一的途径,无论他们的个人能力或与佛陀的暂时关系如何,都要真正实现大乘理想。虽然道绰对修行持非常开明的态度,认为任何怀着生在净土的愿望而进行的修行,都有资格获得阿弥陀誓言的其他力量的好处,但在《安乐集》中也有几点,他挑出念佛,特别是念佛,作为人们从事的最合适和最有效的修行。在这篇文章的第二部分,我介绍了道觉鼓励修持念佛的段落,并表明他优先考虑念佛,因为他认为念佛最适合末世佛法的有情众生,也因为念佛为修行者提供了各种各样的利益,而这些利益是那些通过其他修持在净土寻求出生的人所无法获得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practice and Other Power in Daochuo’s Pure Land Buddhism
Daochuo 道綽 (562–645) is revered as a patriarch of both the Pure Land and the True Pure Land schools of Buddhism in Japan. In his Anleji 安楽集 he makes a variety of arguments about the necessity and importance of relying on the “path of easy practice” whereby one aspires to enlightenment through birth in the Amituo’s Pure Land based on the working of the other power of Amituo’s vows. Daochuo’s prioritization of the Pure Land teachings in well know both inside and outside of Japan, but previous scholarship has focused particularly on Daochuo’s arguments that the Pure Land teachings should be taken as the centerpiece of Buddhism due to the degenerate nature of the age and the inferior capacities of the people. Therefore, previous scholarship in both Japanese and English on Daochuo has primarily characterized him as offering an easy practice for incompetent people who were unlucky enough to have been born at a time far removed from Śākyamuni.Through a careful analysis of passages in the second fascicle of the Anleji, in the first section of this paper I show that this understanding of Daochuo’s view of the “path of easy practice” fails to take into account the severity of his criticisms of the Buddhist practices that were preached in the Buddhist scriptures and prevalent at his time and therefore mischaracterizes the nature of his choice of Pure Land Buddhism as the most effective and excellent form of Buddhism and the only avenue for anyone at any time, regardless of their individual capacities or temporal relation to a Buddha, to genuinely fulfill the Mahayana ideal.Although Daochuo took a very broadminded stance toward practice, holding that any practice undertaken with a desire to be born in the Pure Land would qualify the practitioner to receive the benefits of the other power of Amituo’s vows, there are also several points in the Anleji where he singles out the practice of the nianfo 念仏, particularly vocal recitation of the nianfo, as the most appropriate and effective practice for people to engage in. In the second section of this paper, I introduce the passages where Daochuo encourages the practice of the nianfo and show that he prioritized it both because he held it was most appropriate for the sentient beings of the Latter Days of the Dharma and because it afforded practitioners with a variety of benefits that were not available to those who sought after birth in the Pure Land through other practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信