欧洲专利公约下符合专利条件的发明要求及其对涉及人工智能的创造的影响

Liva Rudzite-Celmina
{"title":"欧洲专利公约下符合专利条件的发明要求及其对涉及人工智能的创造的影响","authors":"Liva Rudzite-Celmina","doi":"10.5817/mujlt2023-2-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial Intelligence and its subfield, Machine Learning are areas of computer science; thus, they rely on algorithms, models, computer programs and software applicable in numerous areas. Since respective creations involve resources and shift from hardware to software, there is an incentive to protect them legally. Due to their dual nature, the algorithms, models, computer programs, and software might be too “technical” to avail copyright protection but not “technical” enough for a patent. Whereas trade secret protection might not be sufficient means of protection in all cases.The article explores the issues and, as its main argument, builds further on the academic proposals on the sui generis mechanism. It also suggests certification as the potential approach to avail the desired protection instead of diluting the existing protection frameworks. An alternative would be to lie on the complete availability or trade secret protection, none of which would be an adequate balance.","PeriodicalId":38294,"journal":{"name":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patent-Eligible Invention Requirement Under the European Patent Convention and its Implications on Creations Involving Artificial Intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Liva Rudzite-Celmina\",\"doi\":\"10.5817/mujlt2023-2-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial Intelligence and its subfield, Machine Learning are areas of computer science; thus, they rely on algorithms, models, computer programs and software applicable in numerous areas. Since respective creations involve resources and shift from hardware to software, there is an incentive to protect them legally. Due to their dual nature, the algorithms, models, computer programs, and software might be too “technical” to avail copyright protection but not “technical” enough for a patent. Whereas trade secret protection might not be sufficient means of protection in all cases.The article explores the issues and, as its main argument, builds further on the academic proposals on the sui generis mechanism. It also suggests certification as the potential approach to avail the desired protection instead of diluting the existing protection frameworks. An alternative would be to lie on the complete availability or trade secret protection, none of which would be an adequate balance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5817/mujlt2023-2-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/mujlt2023-2-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人工智能及其子领域机器学习是计算机科学的领域;因此,他们依赖于算法、模型、计算机程序和适用于许多领域的软件。由于各自的创作涉及资源,并且从硬件转向软件,因此有动机对其进行法律保护。由于它们的双重性质,算法、模型、计算机程序和软件可能过于“技术性”而无法获得版权保护,但又不够“技术性”而不足以获得专利。然而,商业秘密保护可能并非在所有情况下都是充分的保护手段。本文对这些问题进行了探讨,并以此为主要论点,在此基础上进一步构建了有关自定义机制的学术建议。它还建议将认证作为利用所需保护而不是稀释现有保护框架的潜在方法。另一种选择是依赖于完全可用性或商业秘密保护,这两者都不是适当的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patent-Eligible Invention Requirement Under the European Patent Convention and its Implications on Creations Involving Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence and its subfield, Machine Learning are areas of computer science; thus, they rely on algorithms, models, computer programs and software applicable in numerous areas. Since respective creations involve resources and shift from hardware to software, there is an incentive to protect them legally. Due to their dual nature, the algorithms, models, computer programs, and software might be too “technical” to avail copyright protection but not “technical” enough for a patent. Whereas trade secret protection might not be sufficient means of protection in all cases.The article explores the issues and, as its main argument, builds further on the academic proposals on the sui generis mechanism. It also suggests certification as the potential approach to avail the desired protection instead of diluting the existing protection frameworks. An alternative would be to lie on the complete availability or trade secret protection, none of which would be an adequate balance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信