TCP拥塞控制算法的性能比较分析:弹性TCP与e-弹性TCP

IF 0.3 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Vivek Kumar Jaiswal, Sanjeev Patel
{"title":"TCP拥塞控制算法的性能比较分析:弹性TCP与e-弹性TCP","authors":"Vivek Kumar Jaiswal, Sanjeev Patel","doi":"10.1504/ijipt.2023.133029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is a widely used transport layer protocol for reliable IP networks. To handle congestion in the network due to various reasons many algorithms have been designed. In this paper, we have carried out a detailed analysis of the Elastic TCP congestion control algorithm which is based on delay and independent of Round-Trip Time (RTT). Elastic TCP uses a Window-correlated Weighting Function (WWF) for deciding the update of congestion window size. We have proposed an enhanced Elastic (e-Elastic) for further improvement of performance. These algorithms Elastic and e-Elastic are more suitable for the high and moderate Bandwidth-Delay Product (BDT) while we have tested it for moderate BDT on network simulator-3 (ns-3). Our proposed algorithm improves the average throughput with 5.11%, 10.14%, 10.69% and 11.07% over Elastic, CUBIC, Veno and New Reno, respectively.","PeriodicalId":42931,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative performance analysis of TCP congestion control algorithm: elastic TCP vs. e-Elastic TCP\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Kumar Jaiswal, Sanjeev Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijipt.2023.133029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is a widely used transport layer protocol for reliable IP networks. To handle congestion in the network due to various reasons many algorithms have been designed. In this paper, we have carried out a detailed analysis of the Elastic TCP congestion control algorithm which is based on delay and independent of Round-Trip Time (RTT). Elastic TCP uses a Window-correlated Weighting Function (WWF) for deciding the update of congestion window size. We have proposed an enhanced Elastic (e-Elastic) for further improvement of performance. These algorithms Elastic and e-Elastic are more suitable for the high and moderate Bandwidth-Delay Product (BDT) while we have tested it for moderate BDT on network simulator-3 (ns-3). Our proposed algorithm improves the average throughput with 5.11%, 10.14%, 10.69% and 11.07% over Elastic, CUBIC, Veno and New Reno, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijipt.2023.133029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijipt.2023.133029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

TCP (Transmission Control Protocol)是一种广泛应用于可靠IP网络的传输层协议。为了处理由于各种原因引起的网络拥塞,人们设计了许多算法。本文详细分析了基于时延且不依赖于往返时间(RTT)的弹性TCP拥塞控制算法。弹性TCP使用窗口相关加权函数(WWF)来决定拥塞窗口大小的更新。我们提出了一个增强的Elastic (e-Elastic),以进一步提高性能。这些算法Elastic和e-Elastic更适合于高和中等带宽延迟积(BDT),我们已经在网络模拟器-3 (ns-3)上对其进行了中等带宽延迟积(BDT)测试。我们提出的算法比Elastic、CUBIC、Veno和New Reno分别提高了5.11%、10.14%、10.69%和11.07%的平均吞吐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative performance analysis of TCP congestion control algorithm: elastic TCP vs. e-Elastic TCP
The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is a widely used transport layer protocol for reliable IP networks. To handle congestion in the network due to various reasons many algorithms have been designed. In this paper, we have carried out a detailed analysis of the Elastic TCP congestion control algorithm which is based on delay and independent of Round-Trip Time (RTT). Elastic TCP uses a Window-correlated Weighting Function (WWF) for deciding the update of congestion window size. We have proposed an enhanced Elastic (e-Elastic) for further improvement of performance. These algorithms Elastic and e-Elastic are more suitable for the high and moderate Bandwidth-Delay Product (BDT) while we have tested it for moderate BDT on network simulator-3 (ns-3). Our proposed algorithm improves the average throughput with 5.11%, 10.14%, 10.69% and 11.07% over Elastic, CUBIC, Veno and New Reno, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology
International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The IJIPT provides an open forum for researchers, academics, engineers, network managers, and service providers in Internet Protocol Technology. Extensive exchange of information will be provided on new protocols, standards, services, and various applications in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信