测试军国主义和仇外语言如何影响Facebook上关于入侵物种的帖子的参与

IF 3 3区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Sedona Chinn, Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice, P. Sol Hart, Brendon M.H. Larson
{"title":"测试军国主义和仇外语言如何影响Facebook上关于入侵物种的帖子的参与","authors":"Sedona Chinn, Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice, P. Sol Hart, Brendon M.H. Larson","doi":"10.1080/17524032.2023.2267787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTInvasive species are considered a significant threat to biodiversity and economic activities. Concerned stakeholders have adopted militaristic metaphors and xenophobic language to raise public awareness about the issue, yet communication theory provides conflicting guidance on whether this is likely to be effective. This research insight analyzes over 400,000 Facebook posts from North American stakeholders to find that stakeholder Facebook pages discuss invasive species infrequently, sometimes using militaristic and rarely xenophobic language, but that neither militaristic nor xenophobic language is associated with online engagement.KEYWORDS: Invasive speciesmetaphorpublic engagementsocial media Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":54205,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing How Militaristic and Xenophobic Language Affects Engagement with Facebook Posts about Invasive Species\",\"authors\":\"Sedona Chinn, Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice, P. Sol Hart, Brendon M.H. Larson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17524032.2023.2267787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTInvasive species are considered a significant threat to biodiversity and economic activities. Concerned stakeholders have adopted militaristic metaphors and xenophobic language to raise public awareness about the issue, yet communication theory provides conflicting guidance on whether this is likely to be effective. This research insight analyzes over 400,000 Facebook posts from North American stakeholders to find that stakeholder Facebook pages discuss invasive species infrequently, sometimes using militaristic and rarely xenophobic language, but that neither militaristic nor xenophobic language is associated with online engagement.KEYWORDS: Invasive speciesmetaphorpublic engagementsocial media Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":54205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2267787\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2267787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要入侵物种被认为是对生物多样性和经济活动的重大威胁。相关的利益相关者采用了军国主义的隐喻和仇外的语言来提高公众对这一问题的认识,但传播理论对这种做法是否可能有效提供了相互矛盾的指导。这项研究分析了来自北美利益相关者的40多万Facebook帖子,发现利益相关者的Facebook页面很少讨论入侵物种,有时使用军国主义语言,很少使用仇外语言,但无论是军国主义还是仇外语言都与在线参与无关。关键词:入侵物种;隐喻;公众参与;社交媒体披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing How Militaristic and Xenophobic Language Affects Engagement with Facebook Posts about Invasive Species
ABSTRACTInvasive species are considered a significant threat to biodiversity and economic activities. Concerned stakeholders have adopted militaristic metaphors and xenophobic language to raise public awareness about the issue, yet communication theory provides conflicting guidance on whether this is likely to be effective. This research insight analyzes over 400,000 Facebook posts from North American stakeholders to find that stakeholder Facebook pages discuss invasive species infrequently, sometimes using militaristic and rarely xenophobic language, but that neither militaristic nor xenophobic language is associated with online engagement.KEYWORDS: Invasive speciesmetaphorpublic engagementsocial media Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Environmental Communication is an international, peer-reviewed forum for multidisciplinary research and analysis assessing the many intersections among communication, media, society, and environmental issues. These include but are not limited to debates over climate change, natural resources, sustainability, conservation, wildlife, ecosystems, water, environmental health, food and agriculture, energy, and emerging technologies. Submissions should contribute to our understanding of scientific controversies, political developments, policy solutions, institutional change, cultural trends, media portrayals, public opinion and participation, and/or professional decisions. Articles often seek to bridge gaps between theory and practice, and are written in a style that is broadly accessible and engaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信