农业综合企业的三重双重性:领导力、市场导向与结构平衡

Muhammad Waqas, Farzan Yahya, Ammar Ahmed, José E. Muñoz
{"title":"农业综合企业的三重双重性:领导力、市场导向与结构平衡","authors":"Muhammad Waqas, Farzan Yahya, Ammar Ahmed, José E. Muñoz","doi":"10.22434/ifamr2020.0212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The main objective of the study is to examine the complementary and ambidextrous effects of leadership on organizational ambidexterity along with the moderating role of market orientation (MO). Using survey data from a sample of 430 agribusiness firms, we found that excess humility leads to an imbalance between exploration and exploitation. This detrimental effect of superfluous humility can be mitigated when the charisma co-exists with humility and the ambidextrous effect of these two traits have an advantage beyond their individual effect. Furthermore, balanced MO improves organizational ambidexterity more effectively compared to the individual effects of responsive or proactive MO. Results also show that ambidextrous MO positively moderates the relationship between CEO charismatic-humble leadership and organizational ambidexterity. Besides the aforementioned theoretical contributions, this study has certain managerial implications. The findings suggest that CEOs can improve organizational ambidexterity with their charisma and humility. Additionally, strong visions of charismatic leaders and continuous recognition from humble leaders are necessary for contextual ambidextrous outcomes.","PeriodicalId":101231,"journal":{"name":"The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Threefold Ambidexterity of Agribusiness: Leadership, Market Orientation, and Structural Balance\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Waqas, Farzan Yahya, Ammar Ahmed, José E. Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.22434/ifamr2020.0212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The main objective of the study is to examine the complementary and ambidextrous effects of leadership on organizational ambidexterity along with the moderating role of market orientation (MO). Using survey data from a sample of 430 agribusiness firms, we found that excess humility leads to an imbalance between exploration and exploitation. This detrimental effect of superfluous humility can be mitigated when the charisma co-exists with humility and the ambidextrous effect of these two traits have an advantage beyond their individual effect. Furthermore, balanced MO improves organizational ambidexterity more effectively compared to the individual effects of responsive or proactive MO. Results also show that ambidextrous MO positively moderates the relationship between CEO charismatic-humble leadership and organizational ambidexterity. Besides the aforementioned theoretical contributions, this study has certain managerial implications. The findings suggest that CEOs can improve organizational ambidexterity with their charisma and humility. Additionally, strong visions of charismatic leaders and continuous recognition from humble leaders are necessary for contextual ambidextrous outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2020.0212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2020.0212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究的主要目的是考察领导对组织双元性的互补和双元性效应以及市场导向的调节作用。通过对430家农业综合企业样本的调查数据,我们发现过度的谦逊导致了勘探和开采之间的不平衡。当魅力与谦逊共存时,这种过度谦逊的有害影响可以得到缓解,而且这两种特质的双重效应具有超越个体效应的优势。此外,与响应型和主动型组织管理相比,平衡型组织管理更有效地改善了组织双元性。研究结果还表明,双元性组织管理正向调节CEO魅力谦卑型领导与组织双元性的关系。除了上述理论贡献外,本研究还具有一定的管理意义。研究结果表明,首席执行官可以通过他们的魅力和谦逊来改善组织的双重灵活性。此外,对魅力型领导者的强烈愿景和谦逊型领导者的持续认可,对于情境性的双灵巧结果是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Threefold Ambidexterity of Agribusiness: Leadership, Market Orientation, and Structural Balance
Abstract The main objective of the study is to examine the complementary and ambidextrous effects of leadership on organizational ambidexterity along with the moderating role of market orientation (MO). Using survey data from a sample of 430 agribusiness firms, we found that excess humility leads to an imbalance between exploration and exploitation. This detrimental effect of superfluous humility can be mitigated when the charisma co-exists with humility and the ambidextrous effect of these two traits have an advantage beyond their individual effect. Furthermore, balanced MO improves organizational ambidexterity more effectively compared to the individual effects of responsive or proactive MO. Results also show that ambidextrous MO positively moderates the relationship between CEO charismatic-humble leadership and organizational ambidexterity. Besides the aforementioned theoretical contributions, this study has certain managerial implications. The findings suggest that CEOs can improve organizational ambidexterity with their charisma and humility. Additionally, strong visions of charismatic leaders and continuous recognition from humble leaders are necessary for contextual ambidextrous outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信